Does the Linux kernel need a file system to run?2019 Community Moderator ElectionDoes Android really use the same kernel as Linux?How to configure Linux to cache file metadata in preference to contents?File system that never breaks (data loss acceptable)When do I need to specify add_efi_memmap as kernel argument in UEFI/EFI boot?What files does the Linux kernel access?Root file system vs partition's file systemWhat parts of the Linux kernel I do not need?Linux/Embedded Linux - Understanding the Kernel and additional BSP specific componentsHow do I run the Linux kernel?Why does the Linux kernel build system use incremental linking or ar T thin archives?

What is the English pronunciation of "pain au chocolat"?

US tourist/student visa

Delete multiple columns using awk or sed

Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?

"It doesn't matter" or "it won't matter"?

Why the "ls" command is showing the permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

Giving feedback to someone without sounding prejudiced

How do I fix the group tension caused by my character stealing and possibly killing without provocation?

How much theory knowledge is actually used while playing?

Non-trope happy ending?

Is it necessary to use pronouns with the verb "essere"?

What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?

Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?

How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?

Does the reader need to like the PoV character?

Is there a nicer/politer/more positive alternative for "negates"?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

Will number of steps recorded on FitBit/any fitness tracker add up distance in PokemonGo?

What (the heck) is a Super Worm Equinox Moon?

Is this part of the description of the Archfey warlock's Misty Escape feature redundant?

I found an audio circuit and I built it just fine, but I find it a bit too quiet. How do I amplify the output so that it is a bit louder?

The IT department bottlenecks progress, how should I handle this?

Change the color of a single dot in `ddot` symbol



Does the Linux kernel need a file system to run?



2019 Community Moderator ElectionDoes Android really use the same kernel as Linux?How to configure Linux to cache file metadata in preference to contents?File system that never breaks (data loss acceptable)When do I need to specify add_efi_memmap as kernel argument in UEFI/EFI boot?What files does the Linux kernel access?Root file system vs partition's file systemWhat parts of the Linux kernel I do not need?Linux/Embedded Linux - Understanding the Kernel and additional BSP specific componentsHow do I run the Linux kernel?Why does the Linux kernel build system use incremental linking or ar T thin archives?










4















My opinion is yes, it does, because all useful exposure to the outside world (non-priviledged processor mode) would first require a process running in the outside world. That would require a file system, even a temporary, in-RAM, file system.



Another engineer disagrees with me, but I can't seem to prove this beyond all (unknown to me) cases.



Does the answer to this question depend on the definition of 'running'?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • i think that a running kernel does not "require" useful exposure to the outside world

    – jsotola
    1 hour ago












  • Brings to mind the old halted Linux firewall (circa 2002)

    – Jeff Schaller
    6 mins ago















4















My opinion is yes, it does, because all useful exposure to the outside world (non-priviledged processor mode) would first require a process running in the outside world. That would require a file system, even a temporary, in-RAM, file system.



Another engineer disagrees with me, but I can't seem to prove this beyond all (unknown to me) cases.



Does the answer to this question depend on the definition of 'running'?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • i think that a running kernel does not "require" useful exposure to the outside world

    – jsotola
    1 hour ago












  • Brings to mind the old halted Linux firewall (circa 2002)

    – Jeff Schaller
    6 mins ago













4












4








4








My opinion is yes, it does, because all useful exposure to the outside world (non-priviledged processor mode) would first require a process running in the outside world. That would require a file system, even a temporary, in-RAM, file system.



Another engineer disagrees with me, but I can't seem to prove this beyond all (unknown to me) cases.



Does the answer to this question depend on the definition of 'running'?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












My opinion is yes, it does, because all useful exposure to the outside world (non-priviledged processor mode) would first require a process running in the outside world. That would require a file system, even a temporary, in-RAM, file system.



Another engineer disagrees with me, but I can't seem to prove this beyond all (unknown to me) cases.



Does the answer to this question depend on the definition of 'running'?







filesystems linux-kernel






share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









Peter L.Peter L.

1213




1213




New contributor




Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Peter L. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • i think that a running kernel does not "require" useful exposure to the outside world

    – jsotola
    1 hour ago












  • Brings to mind the old halted Linux firewall (circa 2002)

    – Jeff Schaller
    6 mins ago

















  • i think that a running kernel does not "require" useful exposure to the outside world

    – jsotola
    1 hour ago












  • Brings to mind the old halted Linux firewall (circa 2002)

    – Jeff Schaller
    6 mins ago
















i think that a running kernel does not "require" useful exposure to the outside world

– jsotola
1 hour ago






i think that a running kernel does not "require" useful exposure to the outside world

– jsotola
1 hour ago














Brings to mind the old halted Linux firewall (circa 2002)

– Jeff Schaller
6 mins ago





Brings to mind the old halted Linux firewall (circa 2002)

– Jeff Schaller
6 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














That's rather an odd question because you don't run the kernel like you run a program. The kernel is a platform to run programs on. Of course there is setup and shutdown code but it's not possible to run the kernel on its own. There must always be a main "init" process. And the kernel will panic if it's not there. If init tries to exit the kernel will also panic.



These days the init process is something like systemd. If not otherwise specified the kernel will try to run a program starting with /sbin/init. See the init Param here http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/bootparam.7.html in an emergency you can boot Linux with init=/bin/bash . But notice how you always specify a file on the file system to run.



So the kernel will panic if it starts up an has no file system because without one there is no way to load init.



Some confusion may arise because of a chicken and egg situation where the kernel must load drivers to access it's file system. To get round this an initial ramdisk is loaded from an image on disk containing vital drivers and setup scripts. These are executed before the file system is loaded. But make no mistake the initial ramdisk is itself a file system.






share|improve this answer

























  • Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

    – Peter L.
    16 mins ago


















2














In Linux, every device is a file, so you have to have a filesystem to run it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

    – Philip Couling
    47 mins ago










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Peter L. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507837%2fdoes-the-linux-kernel-need-a-file-system-to-run%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














That's rather an odd question because you don't run the kernel like you run a program. The kernel is a platform to run programs on. Of course there is setup and shutdown code but it's not possible to run the kernel on its own. There must always be a main "init" process. And the kernel will panic if it's not there. If init tries to exit the kernel will also panic.



These days the init process is something like systemd. If not otherwise specified the kernel will try to run a program starting with /sbin/init. See the init Param here http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/bootparam.7.html in an emergency you can boot Linux with init=/bin/bash . But notice how you always specify a file on the file system to run.



So the kernel will panic if it starts up an has no file system because without one there is no way to load init.



Some confusion may arise because of a chicken and egg situation where the kernel must load drivers to access it's file system. To get round this an initial ramdisk is loaded from an image on disk containing vital drivers and setup scripts. These are executed before the file system is loaded. But make no mistake the initial ramdisk is itself a file system.






share|improve this answer

























  • Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

    – Peter L.
    16 mins ago















3














That's rather an odd question because you don't run the kernel like you run a program. The kernel is a platform to run programs on. Of course there is setup and shutdown code but it's not possible to run the kernel on its own. There must always be a main "init" process. And the kernel will panic if it's not there. If init tries to exit the kernel will also panic.



These days the init process is something like systemd. If not otherwise specified the kernel will try to run a program starting with /sbin/init. See the init Param here http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/bootparam.7.html in an emergency you can boot Linux with init=/bin/bash . But notice how you always specify a file on the file system to run.



So the kernel will panic if it starts up an has no file system because without one there is no way to load init.



Some confusion may arise because of a chicken and egg situation where the kernel must load drivers to access it's file system. To get round this an initial ramdisk is loaded from an image on disk containing vital drivers and setup scripts. These are executed before the file system is loaded. But make no mistake the initial ramdisk is itself a file system.






share|improve this answer

























  • Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

    – Peter L.
    16 mins ago













3












3








3







That's rather an odd question because you don't run the kernel like you run a program. The kernel is a platform to run programs on. Of course there is setup and shutdown code but it's not possible to run the kernel on its own. There must always be a main "init" process. And the kernel will panic if it's not there. If init tries to exit the kernel will also panic.



These days the init process is something like systemd. If not otherwise specified the kernel will try to run a program starting with /sbin/init. See the init Param here http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/bootparam.7.html in an emergency you can boot Linux with init=/bin/bash . But notice how you always specify a file on the file system to run.



So the kernel will panic if it starts up an has no file system because without one there is no way to load init.



Some confusion may arise because of a chicken and egg situation where the kernel must load drivers to access it's file system. To get round this an initial ramdisk is loaded from an image on disk containing vital drivers and setup scripts. These are executed before the file system is loaded. But make no mistake the initial ramdisk is itself a file system.






share|improve this answer















That's rather an odd question because you don't run the kernel like you run a program. The kernel is a platform to run programs on. Of course there is setup and shutdown code but it's not possible to run the kernel on its own. There must always be a main "init" process. And the kernel will panic if it's not there. If init tries to exit the kernel will also panic.



These days the init process is something like systemd. If not otherwise specified the kernel will try to run a program starting with /sbin/init. See the init Param here http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/bootparam.7.html in an emergency you can boot Linux with init=/bin/bash . But notice how you always specify a file on the file system to run.



So the kernel will panic if it starts up an has no file system because without one there is no way to load init.



Some confusion may arise because of a chicken and egg situation where the kernel must load drivers to access it's file system. To get round this an initial ramdisk is loaded from an image on disk containing vital drivers and setup scripts. These are executed before the file system is loaded. But make no mistake the initial ramdisk is itself a file system.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 41 mins ago

























answered 49 mins ago









Philip CoulingPhilip Couling

2,011920




2,011920












  • Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

    – Peter L.
    16 mins ago

















  • Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

    – Peter L.
    16 mins ago
















Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

– Peter L.
16 mins ago





Isn't there a condition where the kernel gives up trying to initialize hardware and load a known file system (not initrd passed into the kernel via init params), then drops into a very limited shell (without init=/bin/bash)? Also, since you bring up /bin/bash, would the kernel always have that minimal file system available, even if it was built with other .config options that could potentially eliminate this?

– Peter L.
16 mins ago













2














In Linux, every device is a file, so you have to have a filesystem to run it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

    – Philip Couling
    47 mins ago















2














In Linux, every device is a file, so you have to have a filesystem to run it.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

    – Philip Couling
    47 mins ago













2












2








2







In Linux, every device is a file, so you have to have a filesystem to run it.






share|improve this answer













In Linux, every device is a file, so you have to have a filesystem to run it.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









K7AAYK7AAY

744825




744825







  • 1





    But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

    – Philip Couling
    47 mins ago












  • 1





    But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

    – Philip Couling
    47 mins ago







1




1





But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

– Philip Couling
47 mins ago





But of course the device drivers exist inside the kernel irrespective of whether or not a device file points to them.

– Philip Couling
47 mins ago










Peter L. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Peter L. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Peter L. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Peter L. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507837%2fdoes-the-linux-kernel-need-a-file-system-to-run%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Dapidodigma demeter Subspecies | Notae | Tabula navigationisDapidodigmaAfrotropical Butterflies: Lycaenidae - Subtribe IolainaAmplifica

Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

Gaius Norbanus Flaccus (consul 38 a.C.n.) Index De gente | De cursu honorum | Notae | Fontes | Si vis plura legere | Tabula navigationisHic legere potes