How do I use proper grammar in the negation of “have not” for the following sentence translation?What does “I Can't Get No Satisfaction” mean?How do you tell when you're reading a poor translation?The word 'not' often doesn't mean total negation in mathematical sense?What is the best Bible translation by which I can speak proper English if I read it enough times?Words where “not [word]” means more than a lack ofDoes have “well drunk” mean “to be drunk”?“Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise…”What is a good English verb that means “to eliminate a term from a text being translated in order to achieve a natural translation"?Good synonyms for the words 'smarthead' and 'smartass', for use in a translationWhat are the naunces of the placement of 'be' in the following two sentences?

How to reduce LED flash rate (frequency)

How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?

Examples of subgroups where it's nontrivial to show closure under multiplication?

French for 'It must be my imagination'?

Why does nature favour the Laplacian?

How do I use proper grammar in the negation of "have not" for the following sentence translation?

How can I practically buy stocks?

Is contacting this expert in the field something acceptable or would it be discourteous?

Reducing vertical space in stackrel

Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?

Packing rectangles: Does rotation ever help?

What route did the Hindenburg take when traveling from Germany to the U.S.?

simple conditions equation

A Strange Latex Symbol

What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?

How did Captain America manage to do this?

How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?

Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?

How to creep the reader out with what seems like a normal person?

How to pronounce 'C++' in Spanish

What is the relationship between spectral sequences and obstruction theory?

The Defining Moment

Stop and Take a Breath!

How to solve constants out of the internal energy equation?



How do I use proper grammar in the negation of “have not” for the following sentence translation?


What does “I Can't Get No Satisfaction” mean?How do you tell when you're reading a poor translation?The word 'not' often doesn't mean total negation in mathematical sense?What is the best Bible translation by which I can speak proper English if I read it enough times?Words where “not [word]” means more than a lack ofDoes have “well drunk” mean “to be drunk”?“Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise…”What is a good English verb that means “to eliminate a term from a text being translated in order to achieve a natural translation"?Good synonyms for the words 'smarthead' and 'smartass', for use in a translationWhat are the naunces of the placement of 'be' in the following two sentences?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















I'm translating a DIALOUGE sentence from Japanese to English, and I'm having issues with keeping the negation of the verb "have not" in my translation while following proper English grammar, or avoiding the sentence reading awkwardly in English.



Below is the original Japanese sentence and underneath that are the individual segments parsed out with their English equivalent. (Particles are Japanese 'articles', and can mean different things based on the surrounding words or phrases).




貴女とて想いは同じではありませんか




貴女 - feminine - 'you'



とて - particle - 'even'/'even though'/'on the grounds that'



想い - noun - 'thought'/'experience'/'hope'/'expectation'



は - topic particle (denotes topic of sentence)



同じ noun - 'same'/'similar' / etc.



では - conjunction - 'then'/'well'/'so'/'well then'




ありません - sentence ending verb - 'to have'/'to exist'/'to come about' negative polite form




か - Japanese question mark



The following are the English translations I've made after converting the literal translation to proper American English.



Even though you have not had similar thoughts then?



Even though you have not had similar thoughts as well?



Even you have not thought the same as well?



Even you have not similar thoughts as well?



A only-English-speaking friend I've run the above translations by suggested
"Even you must have had similar thoughts?" which fits the situation, but leaves out the 'not'.



Based on the information above, which sentence works while leaving in the 'not', or what would you suggest as a alternate translation that works in English that contains the negation?










share|improve this question






















  • Have even you yourself not thought so?

    – Xanne
    3 hours ago


















1















I'm translating a DIALOUGE sentence from Japanese to English, and I'm having issues with keeping the negation of the verb "have not" in my translation while following proper English grammar, or avoiding the sentence reading awkwardly in English.



Below is the original Japanese sentence and underneath that are the individual segments parsed out with their English equivalent. (Particles are Japanese 'articles', and can mean different things based on the surrounding words or phrases).




貴女とて想いは同じではありませんか




貴女 - feminine - 'you'



とて - particle - 'even'/'even though'/'on the grounds that'



想い - noun - 'thought'/'experience'/'hope'/'expectation'



は - topic particle (denotes topic of sentence)



同じ noun - 'same'/'similar' / etc.



では - conjunction - 'then'/'well'/'so'/'well then'




ありません - sentence ending verb - 'to have'/'to exist'/'to come about' negative polite form




か - Japanese question mark



The following are the English translations I've made after converting the literal translation to proper American English.



Even though you have not had similar thoughts then?



Even though you have not had similar thoughts as well?



Even you have not thought the same as well?



Even you have not similar thoughts as well?



A only-English-speaking friend I've run the above translations by suggested
"Even you must have had similar thoughts?" which fits the situation, but leaves out the 'not'.



Based on the information above, which sentence works while leaving in the 'not', or what would you suggest as a alternate translation that works in English that contains the negation?










share|improve this question






















  • Have even you yourself not thought so?

    – Xanne
    3 hours ago














1












1








1








I'm translating a DIALOUGE sentence from Japanese to English, and I'm having issues with keeping the negation of the verb "have not" in my translation while following proper English grammar, or avoiding the sentence reading awkwardly in English.



Below is the original Japanese sentence and underneath that are the individual segments parsed out with their English equivalent. (Particles are Japanese 'articles', and can mean different things based on the surrounding words or phrases).




貴女とて想いは同じではありませんか




貴女 - feminine - 'you'



とて - particle - 'even'/'even though'/'on the grounds that'



想い - noun - 'thought'/'experience'/'hope'/'expectation'



は - topic particle (denotes topic of sentence)



同じ noun - 'same'/'similar' / etc.



では - conjunction - 'then'/'well'/'so'/'well then'




ありません - sentence ending verb - 'to have'/'to exist'/'to come about' negative polite form




か - Japanese question mark



The following are the English translations I've made after converting the literal translation to proper American English.



Even though you have not had similar thoughts then?



Even though you have not had similar thoughts as well?



Even you have not thought the same as well?



Even you have not similar thoughts as well?



A only-English-speaking friend I've run the above translations by suggested
"Even you must have had similar thoughts?" which fits the situation, but leaves out the 'not'.



Based on the information above, which sentence works while leaving in the 'not', or what would you suggest as a alternate translation that works in English that contains the negation?










share|improve this question














I'm translating a DIALOUGE sentence from Japanese to English, and I'm having issues with keeping the negation of the verb "have not" in my translation while following proper English grammar, or avoiding the sentence reading awkwardly in English.



Below is the original Japanese sentence and underneath that are the individual segments parsed out with their English equivalent. (Particles are Japanese 'articles', and can mean different things based on the surrounding words or phrases).




貴女とて想いは同じではありませんか




貴女 - feminine - 'you'



とて - particle - 'even'/'even though'/'on the grounds that'



想い - noun - 'thought'/'experience'/'hope'/'expectation'



は - topic particle (denotes topic of sentence)



同じ noun - 'same'/'similar' / etc.



では - conjunction - 'then'/'well'/'so'/'well then'




ありません - sentence ending verb - 'to have'/'to exist'/'to come about' negative polite form




か - Japanese question mark



The following are the English translations I've made after converting the literal translation to proper American English.



Even though you have not had similar thoughts then?



Even though you have not had similar thoughts as well?



Even you have not thought the same as well?



Even you have not similar thoughts as well?



A only-English-speaking friend I've run the above translations by suggested
"Even you must have had similar thoughts?" which fits the situation, but leaves out the 'not'.



Based on the information above, which sentence works while leaving in the 'not', or what would you suggest as a alternate translation that works in English that contains the negation?







translation negation double-negation






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









Toyu_FreyToyu_Frey

1185




1185












  • Have even you yourself not thought so?

    – Xanne
    3 hours ago


















  • Have even you yourself not thought so?

    – Xanne
    3 hours ago

















Have even you yourself not thought so?

– Xanne
3 hours ago






Have even you yourself not thought so?

– Xanne
3 hours ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














I think you're focusing too much on word-to-word translations. A Japanese-English dictionary cannot tell you what is appropriate in actual translation. All of the suggested "translations" you included in your question are either ungrammatical or so confusing as to be incomprehensible. That's the result of hewing to closely to "literal" equivalency: you get a "translation" that doesn't mean anything close to the original.



A negative question isn't the only way to convey the same meaning as ありませんか. In this sentence, that serves to mark the sentence as a tag question. There are other structures in English that express the same meaning. Same with the とて. "Even" isn't the only way to convey the kind of emphasis that とて expresses.



I'd suggest either




You must've had similar thoughts yourself.




or




Have you not had similar thoughts yourself?




if you're really dead-set on keeping a negative question.



In the future, I'd recommend trying to understand the meaning and purpose of the Japanese sentence as a whole before trying to convey that meaning in English. Breaking the sentence into its components and replacing those components one-by-one is not going to lead to an accurate translation.






share|improve this answer























  • Where did you glean the "yourself" from?

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • "Yourself" serves the same purpose as とて. When とて directly follows a noun, it has a very similar meaning to だって or も. "You've thought the same yourself" uses "yourself" to put emphasis on "you".

    – sky
    3 hours ago











  • I think I understand what you're saying about とて, that it's a emphasis particle/verb ending? Would "Surely you have thought the same, haven't you?" work as a translation, now that I know that the sentence is a tag question (I didn't recognize it as one)? I'm just trying to double check my newly gained knowledge of tag sentences.

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • Yes, I think that would work too.

    – sky
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Now that I think about it, I don't know if "tag question" is the right term. It's a broader category that includes other kinds of rhetorical questions. For example, "Haven't you done that already?" is not a tag question question. But it isn't neutrally seeking information either, it assumes the answer. I don't know the term for it, but in Japanese, as in English, oftentimes negative questions are seeking confirmation, or aren't true questions at all.

    – sky
    2 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496437%2fhow-do-i-use-proper-grammar-in-the-negation-of-have-not-for-the-following-sent%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














I think you're focusing too much on word-to-word translations. A Japanese-English dictionary cannot tell you what is appropriate in actual translation. All of the suggested "translations" you included in your question are either ungrammatical or so confusing as to be incomprehensible. That's the result of hewing to closely to "literal" equivalency: you get a "translation" that doesn't mean anything close to the original.



A negative question isn't the only way to convey the same meaning as ありませんか. In this sentence, that serves to mark the sentence as a tag question. There are other structures in English that express the same meaning. Same with the とて. "Even" isn't the only way to convey the kind of emphasis that とて expresses.



I'd suggest either




You must've had similar thoughts yourself.




or




Have you not had similar thoughts yourself?




if you're really dead-set on keeping a negative question.



In the future, I'd recommend trying to understand the meaning and purpose of the Japanese sentence as a whole before trying to convey that meaning in English. Breaking the sentence into its components and replacing those components one-by-one is not going to lead to an accurate translation.






share|improve this answer























  • Where did you glean the "yourself" from?

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • "Yourself" serves the same purpose as とて. When とて directly follows a noun, it has a very similar meaning to だって or も. "You've thought the same yourself" uses "yourself" to put emphasis on "you".

    – sky
    3 hours ago











  • I think I understand what you're saying about とて, that it's a emphasis particle/verb ending? Would "Surely you have thought the same, haven't you?" work as a translation, now that I know that the sentence is a tag question (I didn't recognize it as one)? I'm just trying to double check my newly gained knowledge of tag sentences.

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • Yes, I think that would work too.

    – sky
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Now that I think about it, I don't know if "tag question" is the right term. It's a broader category that includes other kinds of rhetorical questions. For example, "Haven't you done that already?" is not a tag question question. But it isn't neutrally seeking information either, it assumes the answer. I don't know the term for it, but in Japanese, as in English, oftentimes negative questions are seeking confirmation, or aren't true questions at all.

    – sky
    2 hours ago















2














I think you're focusing too much on word-to-word translations. A Japanese-English dictionary cannot tell you what is appropriate in actual translation. All of the suggested "translations" you included in your question are either ungrammatical or so confusing as to be incomprehensible. That's the result of hewing to closely to "literal" equivalency: you get a "translation" that doesn't mean anything close to the original.



A negative question isn't the only way to convey the same meaning as ありませんか. In this sentence, that serves to mark the sentence as a tag question. There are other structures in English that express the same meaning. Same with the とて. "Even" isn't the only way to convey the kind of emphasis that とて expresses.



I'd suggest either




You must've had similar thoughts yourself.




or




Have you not had similar thoughts yourself?




if you're really dead-set on keeping a negative question.



In the future, I'd recommend trying to understand the meaning and purpose of the Japanese sentence as a whole before trying to convey that meaning in English. Breaking the sentence into its components and replacing those components one-by-one is not going to lead to an accurate translation.






share|improve this answer























  • Where did you glean the "yourself" from?

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • "Yourself" serves the same purpose as とて. When とて directly follows a noun, it has a very similar meaning to だって or も. "You've thought the same yourself" uses "yourself" to put emphasis on "you".

    – sky
    3 hours ago











  • I think I understand what you're saying about とて, that it's a emphasis particle/verb ending? Would "Surely you have thought the same, haven't you?" work as a translation, now that I know that the sentence is a tag question (I didn't recognize it as one)? I'm just trying to double check my newly gained knowledge of tag sentences.

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • Yes, I think that would work too.

    – sky
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Now that I think about it, I don't know if "tag question" is the right term. It's a broader category that includes other kinds of rhetorical questions. For example, "Haven't you done that already?" is not a tag question question. But it isn't neutrally seeking information either, it assumes the answer. I don't know the term for it, but in Japanese, as in English, oftentimes negative questions are seeking confirmation, or aren't true questions at all.

    – sky
    2 hours ago













2












2








2







I think you're focusing too much on word-to-word translations. A Japanese-English dictionary cannot tell you what is appropriate in actual translation. All of the suggested "translations" you included in your question are either ungrammatical or so confusing as to be incomprehensible. That's the result of hewing to closely to "literal" equivalency: you get a "translation" that doesn't mean anything close to the original.



A negative question isn't the only way to convey the same meaning as ありませんか. In this sentence, that serves to mark the sentence as a tag question. There are other structures in English that express the same meaning. Same with the とて. "Even" isn't the only way to convey the kind of emphasis that とて expresses.



I'd suggest either




You must've had similar thoughts yourself.




or




Have you not had similar thoughts yourself?




if you're really dead-set on keeping a negative question.



In the future, I'd recommend trying to understand the meaning and purpose of the Japanese sentence as a whole before trying to convey that meaning in English. Breaking the sentence into its components and replacing those components one-by-one is not going to lead to an accurate translation.






share|improve this answer













I think you're focusing too much on word-to-word translations. A Japanese-English dictionary cannot tell you what is appropriate in actual translation. All of the suggested "translations" you included in your question are either ungrammatical or so confusing as to be incomprehensible. That's the result of hewing to closely to "literal" equivalency: you get a "translation" that doesn't mean anything close to the original.



A negative question isn't the only way to convey the same meaning as ありませんか. In this sentence, that serves to mark the sentence as a tag question. There are other structures in English that express the same meaning. Same with the とて. "Even" isn't the only way to convey the kind of emphasis that とて expresses.



I'd suggest either




You must've had similar thoughts yourself.




or




Have you not had similar thoughts yourself?




if you're really dead-set on keeping a negative question.



In the future, I'd recommend trying to understand the meaning and purpose of the Japanese sentence as a whole before trying to convey that meaning in English. Breaking the sentence into its components and replacing those components one-by-one is not going to lead to an accurate translation.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









skysky

1305




1305












  • Where did you glean the "yourself" from?

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • "Yourself" serves the same purpose as とて. When とて directly follows a noun, it has a very similar meaning to だって or も. "You've thought the same yourself" uses "yourself" to put emphasis on "you".

    – sky
    3 hours ago











  • I think I understand what you're saying about とて, that it's a emphasis particle/verb ending? Would "Surely you have thought the same, haven't you?" work as a translation, now that I know that the sentence is a tag question (I didn't recognize it as one)? I'm just trying to double check my newly gained knowledge of tag sentences.

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • Yes, I think that would work too.

    – sky
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Now that I think about it, I don't know if "tag question" is the right term. It's a broader category that includes other kinds of rhetorical questions. For example, "Haven't you done that already?" is not a tag question question. But it isn't neutrally seeking information either, it assumes the answer. I don't know the term for it, but in Japanese, as in English, oftentimes negative questions are seeking confirmation, or aren't true questions at all.

    – sky
    2 hours ago

















  • Where did you glean the "yourself" from?

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • "Yourself" serves the same purpose as とて. When とて directly follows a noun, it has a very similar meaning to だって or も. "You've thought the same yourself" uses "yourself" to put emphasis on "you".

    – sky
    3 hours ago











  • I think I understand what you're saying about とて, that it's a emphasis particle/verb ending? Would "Surely you have thought the same, haven't you?" work as a translation, now that I know that the sentence is a tag question (I didn't recognize it as one)? I'm just trying to double check my newly gained knowledge of tag sentences.

    – Toyu_Frey
    3 hours ago











  • Yes, I think that would work too.

    – sky
    3 hours ago






  • 1





    Now that I think about it, I don't know if "tag question" is the right term. It's a broader category that includes other kinds of rhetorical questions. For example, "Haven't you done that already?" is not a tag question question. But it isn't neutrally seeking information either, it assumes the answer. I don't know the term for it, but in Japanese, as in English, oftentimes negative questions are seeking confirmation, or aren't true questions at all.

    – sky
    2 hours ago
















Where did you glean the "yourself" from?

– Toyu_Frey
3 hours ago





Where did you glean the "yourself" from?

– Toyu_Frey
3 hours ago













"Yourself" serves the same purpose as とて. When とて directly follows a noun, it has a very similar meaning to だって or も. "You've thought the same yourself" uses "yourself" to put emphasis on "you".

– sky
3 hours ago





"Yourself" serves the same purpose as とて. When とて directly follows a noun, it has a very similar meaning to だって or も. "You've thought the same yourself" uses "yourself" to put emphasis on "you".

– sky
3 hours ago













I think I understand what you're saying about とて, that it's a emphasis particle/verb ending? Would "Surely you have thought the same, haven't you?" work as a translation, now that I know that the sentence is a tag question (I didn't recognize it as one)? I'm just trying to double check my newly gained knowledge of tag sentences.

– Toyu_Frey
3 hours ago





I think I understand what you're saying about とて, that it's a emphasis particle/verb ending? Would "Surely you have thought the same, haven't you?" work as a translation, now that I know that the sentence is a tag question (I didn't recognize it as one)? I'm just trying to double check my newly gained knowledge of tag sentences.

– Toyu_Frey
3 hours ago













Yes, I think that would work too.

– sky
3 hours ago





Yes, I think that would work too.

– sky
3 hours ago




1




1





Now that I think about it, I don't know if "tag question" is the right term. It's a broader category that includes other kinds of rhetorical questions. For example, "Haven't you done that already?" is not a tag question question. But it isn't neutrally seeking information either, it assumes the answer. I don't know the term for it, but in Japanese, as in English, oftentimes negative questions are seeking confirmation, or aren't true questions at all.

– sky
2 hours ago





Now that I think about it, I don't know if "tag question" is the right term. It's a broader category that includes other kinds of rhetorical questions. For example, "Haven't you done that already?" is not a tag question question. But it isn't neutrally seeking information either, it assumes the answer. I don't know the term for it, but in Japanese, as in English, oftentimes negative questions are seeking confirmation, or aren't true questions at all.

– sky
2 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496437%2fhow-do-i-use-proper-grammar-in-the-negation-of-have-not-for-the-following-sent%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Dapidodigma demeter Subspecies | Notae | Tabula navigationisDapidodigmaAfrotropical Butterflies: Lycaenidae - Subtribe IolainaAmplifica

Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

Vas sanguineum Index Historia | Divisio | Constructio anatomica | Vasorum sanguineorum morbi (angiopathiae) | Notae | Nexus interniTabula navigationisAmplifica