Longest common substring in linear timeComputing the longest common substring of two strings using suffix arraysFind longest common substring using a rolling hashWhich algorithm to use to find all common substring (LCS case) with really big stringsFinding the longest repeating subsequenceHow to find longest recurring pattern from lage string data set?Longest substring with consecutive repetitionsDoes the Longest Common Subsequence problem reduce to its binary version?Substring problems in suffix treesNumber of optimal solutions for Longest Common Subsequence (Substring) problemLongest common sequence matrix giving wrong answer

Why does the Sun have different day lengths, but not the gas giants?

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?

Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density

Is it better practice to read straight from sheet music rather than memorize it?

"Spoil" vs "Ruin"

How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?

It grows, but water kills it

Why can Carol Danvers change her suit colours in the first place?

250 Floor Tower

How to indicate a cut out for a product window

Travelling outside the UK without a passport

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

Drawing ramified coverings with tikz

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

Closed-form expression for certain product

Why Shazam when there is already Superman?

Terse Method to Swap Lowest for Highest?

Is it safe to use olive oil to clean the ear wax?

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

Aragorn's "guise" in the Orthanc Stone

Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank

Delivering sarcasm

Reverse int within the 32-bit signed integer range: [−2^31, 2^31 − 1]

Redundant comparison & "if" before assignment



Longest common substring in linear time


Computing the longest common substring of two strings using suffix arraysFind longest common substring using a rolling hashWhich algorithm to use to find all common substring (LCS case) with really big stringsFinding the longest repeating subsequenceHow to find longest recurring pattern from lage string data set?Longest substring with consecutive repetitionsDoes the Longest Common Subsequence problem reduce to its binary version?Substring problems in suffix treesNumber of optimal solutions for Longest Common Subsequence (Substring) problemLongest common sequence matrix giving wrong answer













2












$begingroup$


We know that the longest common substring of two strings can be found in O(N^2) time complexity.
Can a solution be found in only linear time?






algorithms time-complexity strings longest-common-substring







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    We know that the longest common substring of two strings can be found in O(N^2) time complexity.
    Can a solution be found in only linear time?






    algorithms time-complexity strings longest-common-substring







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      We know that the longest common substring of two strings can be found in O(N^2) time complexity.
      Can a solution be found in only linear time?






      algorithms time-complexity strings longest-common-substring







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      We know that the longest common substring of two strings can be found in O(N^2) time complexity.
      Can a solution be found in only linear time?






      algorithms time-complexity strings longest-common-substring




      algorithms time-complexity strings longest-common-substring






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      Discrete lizard♦

      4,44011537




      4,44011537










      asked 2 hours ago









      Manoharsinh RanaManoharsinh Rana

      917




      917




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Yes, the longest common substring of two strings can be found in $O(m+n)$ time, where $m$ and $n$ are the lengths of the two strings, assuming the size of the alphabet is constant.



          Here is an excerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem.




          The longest common substrings of a set of strings can be found by building a generalized suffix tree for the strings, and then finding the deepest internal nodes which have leaf nodes from all the strings in the subtree below it.




          Building a generalized suffix tree for two given strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time using the famous ingenious Ukkonen's algorithm. Finding the deepest internal nodes that come from both strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time. Hence we can find the longest common substring in $Theta(m+n)$ time.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            39 mins ago



















          1












          $begingroup$

          It is unlikely that that a better algorithm than quadratic exists, let alone linear. For the related problem of finding subsequences, this is a known result: In the paper "Tight hardness results for LCS and other sequence similarity measures." by Abboud et al. , they show that the existence of an algorithm with a running time of $O(n^2-varepsilon)$, for some $varepsilon>0$ refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH).



          SETH is considered to be very likely true (although not universally accepted), so it is unlikely any $O(n^2-varepsilon)$ time algorithm exists.



          While finding a substring is a slightly different problem, it seems likely to be equally hard.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
            $endgroup$
            – Manoharsinh Rana
            1 hour ago











          • $begingroup$
            @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
            $endgroup$
            – Discrete lizard♦
            1 hour ago










          • $begingroup$
            Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – D.W.♦
            42 mins ago


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Yes. There's even a Wikipedia article about it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem



          In particular, as Wikipedia explains, there is a linear-time algorithm, using suffix trees (or suffix arrays).



          Searching on "longest common substring" turns up that Wikipedia article as the first hit (for me). In the future, please research the problem before asking here. (See, e.g., https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/261592/781723.)






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "419"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105969%2flongest-common-substring-in-linear-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Yes, the longest common substring of two strings can be found in $O(m+n)$ time, where $m$ and $n$ are the lengths of the two strings, assuming the size of the alphabet is constant.



            Here is an excerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem.




            The longest common substrings of a set of strings can be found by building a generalized suffix tree for the strings, and then finding the deepest internal nodes which have leaf nodes from all the strings in the subtree below it.




            Building a generalized suffix tree for two given strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time using the famous ingenious Ukkonen's algorithm. Finding the deepest internal nodes that come from both strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time. Hence we can find the longest common substring in $Theta(m+n)$ time.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Apass.Jack
              39 mins ago
















            2












            $begingroup$

            Yes, the longest common substring of two strings can be found in $O(m+n)$ time, where $m$ and $n$ are the lengths of the two strings, assuming the size of the alphabet is constant.



            Here is an excerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem.




            The longest common substrings of a set of strings can be found by building a generalized suffix tree for the strings, and then finding the deepest internal nodes which have leaf nodes from all the strings in the subtree below it.




            Building a generalized suffix tree for two given strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time using the famous ingenious Ukkonen's algorithm. Finding the deepest internal nodes that come from both strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time. Hence we can find the longest common substring in $Theta(m+n)$ time.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Apass.Jack
              39 mins ago














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Yes, the longest common substring of two strings can be found in $O(m+n)$ time, where $m$ and $n$ are the lengths of the two strings, assuming the size of the alphabet is constant.



            Here is an excerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem.




            The longest common substrings of a set of strings can be found by building a generalized suffix tree for the strings, and then finding the deepest internal nodes which have leaf nodes from all the strings in the subtree below it.




            Building a generalized suffix tree for two given strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time using the famous ingenious Ukkonen's algorithm. Finding the deepest internal nodes that come from both strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time. Hence we can find the longest common substring in $Theta(m+n)$ time.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Yes, the longest common substring of two strings can be found in $O(m+n)$ time, where $m$ and $n$ are the lengths of the two strings, assuming the size of the alphabet is constant.



            Here is an excerpt from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem.




            The longest common substrings of a set of strings can be found by building a generalized suffix tree for the strings, and then finding the deepest internal nodes which have leaf nodes from all the strings in the subtree below it.




            Building a generalized suffix tree for two given strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time using the famous ingenious Ukkonen's algorithm. Finding the deepest internal nodes that come from both strings takes $Theta(m+n)$ time. Hence we can find the longest common substring in $Theta(m+n)$ time.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 43 mins ago









            Apass.JackApass.Jack

            13.3k1939




            13.3k1939











            • $begingroup$
              I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Apass.Jack
              39 mins ago

















            • $begingroup$
              I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Apass.Jack
              39 mins ago
















            $begingroup$
            I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            39 mins ago





            $begingroup$
            I did not see @D.W's answer, possibly because I was interrupted while writing my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            39 mins ago












            1












            $begingroup$

            It is unlikely that that a better algorithm than quadratic exists, let alone linear. For the related problem of finding subsequences, this is a known result: In the paper "Tight hardness results for LCS and other sequence similarity measures." by Abboud et al. , they show that the existence of an algorithm with a running time of $O(n^2-varepsilon)$, for some $varepsilon>0$ refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH).



            SETH is considered to be very likely true (although not universally accepted), so it is unlikely any $O(n^2-varepsilon)$ time algorithm exists.



            While finding a substring is a slightly different problem, it seems likely to be equally hard.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
              $endgroup$
              – Manoharsinh Rana
              1 hour ago











            • $begingroup$
              @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
              $endgroup$
              – Discrete lizard♦
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – D.W.♦
              42 mins ago















            1












            $begingroup$

            It is unlikely that that a better algorithm than quadratic exists, let alone linear. For the related problem of finding subsequences, this is a known result: In the paper "Tight hardness results for LCS and other sequence similarity measures." by Abboud et al. , they show that the existence of an algorithm with a running time of $O(n^2-varepsilon)$, for some $varepsilon>0$ refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH).



            SETH is considered to be very likely true (although not universally accepted), so it is unlikely any $O(n^2-varepsilon)$ time algorithm exists.



            While finding a substring is a slightly different problem, it seems likely to be equally hard.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
              $endgroup$
              – Manoharsinh Rana
              1 hour ago











            • $begingroup$
              @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
              $endgroup$
              – Discrete lizard♦
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – D.W.♦
              42 mins ago













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            It is unlikely that that a better algorithm than quadratic exists, let alone linear. For the related problem of finding subsequences, this is a known result: In the paper "Tight hardness results for LCS and other sequence similarity measures." by Abboud et al. , they show that the existence of an algorithm with a running time of $O(n^2-varepsilon)$, for some $varepsilon>0$ refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH).



            SETH is considered to be very likely true (although not universally accepted), so it is unlikely any $O(n^2-varepsilon)$ time algorithm exists.



            While finding a substring is a slightly different problem, it seems likely to be equally hard.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            It is unlikely that that a better algorithm than quadratic exists, let alone linear. For the related problem of finding subsequences, this is a known result: In the paper "Tight hardness results for LCS and other sequence similarity measures." by Abboud et al. , they show that the existence of an algorithm with a running time of $O(n^2-varepsilon)$, for some $varepsilon>0$ refutes the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH).



            SETH is considered to be very likely true (although not universally accepted), so it is unlikely any $O(n^2-varepsilon)$ time algorithm exists.



            While finding a substring is a slightly different problem, it seems likely to be equally hard.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 1 hour ago

























            answered 2 hours ago









            Discrete lizard♦Discrete lizard

            4,44011537




            4,44011537











            • $begingroup$
              are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
              $endgroup$
              – Manoharsinh Rana
              1 hour ago











            • $begingroup$
              @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
              $endgroup$
              – Discrete lizard♦
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – D.W.♦
              42 mins ago
















            • $begingroup$
              are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
              $endgroup$
              – Manoharsinh Rana
              1 hour ago











            • $begingroup$
              @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
              $endgroup$
              – Discrete lizard♦
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – D.W.♦
              42 mins ago















            $begingroup$
            are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
            $endgroup$
            – Manoharsinh Rana
            1 hour ago





            $begingroup$
            are you talking about subsequence? I am talking about substring.
            $endgroup$
            – Manoharsinh Rana
            1 hour ago













            $begingroup$
            @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
            $endgroup$
            – Discrete lizard♦
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            @ManoharsinhRana Ah, I see. The problems are similar, and it is hard to find results for the string variant. I think there are similar results for the substring problem, but they are not easy to find. You could try looking at papers that cite "Quadratic conditional lower bounds for string problems and dynamic time warping" by Bringmann and Künnemann, as their program lead to a lot of results related to this problem.
            $endgroup$
            – Discrete lizard♦
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – D.W.♦
            42 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Longest common substring is much easier than longest common subsequence. See my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – D.W.♦
            42 mins ago











            1












            $begingroup$

            Yes. There's even a Wikipedia article about it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem



            In particular, as Wikipedia explains, there is a linear-time algorithm, using suffix trees (or suffix arrays).



            Searching on "longest common substring" turns up that Wikipedia article as the first hit (for me). In the future, please research the problem before asking here. (See, e.g., https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/261592/781723.)






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              Yes. There's even a Wikipedia article about it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem



              In particular, as Wikipedia explains, there is a linear-time algorithm, using suffix trees (or suffix arrays).



              Searching on "longest common substring" turns up that Wikipedia article as the first hit (for me). In the future, please research the problem before asking here. (See, e.g., https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/261592/781723.)






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Yes. There's even a Wikipedia article about it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem



                In particular, as Wikipedia explains, there is a linear-time algorithm, using suffix trees (or suffix arrays).



                Searching on "longest common substring" turns up that Wikipedia article as the first hit (for me). In the future, please research the problem before asking here. (See, e.g., https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/261592/781723.)






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Yes. There's even a Wikipedia article about it! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_substring_problem



                In particular, as Wikipedia explains, there is a linear-time algorithm, using suffix trees (or suffix arrays).



                Searching on "longest common substring" turns up that Wikipedia article as the first hit (for me). In the future, please research the problem before asking here. (See, e.g., https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/261592/781723.)







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 1 hour ago









                D.W.♦D.W.

                102k12127291




                102k12127291



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105969%2flongest-common-substring-in-linear-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Dapidodigma demeter Subspecies | Notae | Tabula navigationisDapidodigmaAfrotropical Butterflies: Lycaenidae - Subtribe IolainaAmplifica

                    Image
                    CheritriniSpecies insectorum ex rebus mythologicis appellataeTaxa ClenchTaxa 1961 papiliofamiliaeLycaenidarumLitore EburneoGanaBeninoNigeriaCameroniaRepublica CongensiSudaniaAngoliaRepublica Democratica CongensiZambiaUgandaendemicusHabitatiosilvisLarvaespeciebusformicis Dapidodigma demeter Taxinomia Regnum: Animalia Phylum: Arthropoda Classis: Insecta Ordo: Lepidoptera Familia: Lycaenidae Genus: Dapidodigma Species: D. demeter Binomen Dapidodigma demeter Clench, 1961 [1] Dapidodigma demeter est papilio familiae Lycaenidarum, in Litore Eburneo, Gana, Benino, Nigeria, Cameronia, Republica Congensi, Sudania, Angolia, Republica Democratica Congensi, Zambia, et Uganda endemicus. [2] Habitatio in silvis consistit. Larvae speciebus Albiziae et Homalii vescuntur. Larvae et pupae a formicis curantur. Subspecies | Dapidodigma demeter demeter (Litus Eburneum, Gana, Beninum, Nigeria, Cameronia, Congo) Dapidodigma demeter nuptus Clench, 1961 (Angolia, Zambia, Uganda, Respublica Democratica
                    Read more

                    Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

                    Image
                    ViriNati 1925Mortui 2012Auctores RussiciIncolae MoscuaeIncolae Unionis SovieticaeParticipes secundi belli mundaniPoetae RussiaeScriptores Russiae Russicetr.17 Decembris1925Moscuae15 Decembris2012SovieticusRussicusЯ люблю тебя, жизнь Constantinus Vanšenkin Res apud Vicidata repertae: Nativitas : 17 Decembris 1925 ; Moscua Obitus : 15 Decembris 2012 ; Moscua Patria : Unio Sovietica , Russia Officium Munus : Poëta , Scriptor , Auctor textus musici , Auctor carminum Consociatio Factio : Factio Communistica Unionis Sovieticae Memoria Laurae : USSR State Prize , Medal "For the Victory over Germany in the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945" , Order of the Badge of Honour , Order of the Patriotic War 2nd class , Order "For Merit to the Fatherland" IV class , Order of the Red Banner of Labour , Order of Friendship of Peoples , Medal "For the Capture of Vienna" , Medal "For Strengthening of Brotherhood in Arms" Sepultura : Vagankovo Cemetery Constantinus Iac
                    Read more

                    Gaius Norbanus Flaccus (consul 38 a.C.n.) Index De gente | De cursu honorum | Notae | Fontes | Si vis plura legere | Tabula navigationisHic legere potes

                    Image
                    ViriNati saeculo 1 a.C.n.Mortui saeculo 1 a.C.n.ConsulesProconsules Asiae senator RomanusconsulatumtriumphavitOctaviani Caesarisconsulis anni 83 a.C.n.Marianarum partiumSyllaproscriptusRhodotriumvir monetalisdenariosNorbaPraetor43 a.C.n.triumvirorum42 a.C.n.Lucio Decidio SaxalegionesMacedoniamThraciamSexto PompeioStaio MurcoGnaeo DomitioVia EgnatiaPhilipposAmphipolimtriumvirisproconsul36 a.C.n.triumphum31 a.C.n.proconsul Asiae Gaius Norbanus Flaccus , natus mortuusque primo saeculo a.C.n., fuit senator Romanus qui consulatum anno 38 a.C.n. gessit, anno 34 a.C.n. triumphavit. Bello civili fautor Octaviani Caesaris fuit. Index 1 De gente 2 De cursu honorum 3 Notae 4 Fontes 5 Si vis plura legere De gente | Gaius Norbanus nepos consulis anni 83 a.C.n. vulgo habetur qui homo novus et Marianarum partium dux a Sylla victus et proscriptus tandem se in insula Rhodo ipse necavit. Tunc pater eius triumvir monetalis fuisse videtur qui denarios [1] quosdam circa eundem annum 83 a.C.n. cude
                    Read more