Why is this estimator biased?How do I check for bias of an estimator?Bootstrap confidence interval for a biased estimatorConceptual question about bias of an estimatorEstimator, unbiased or biasedCalculating risk for a density estimatorLinear model with biased estimatorBias Correction for Estimator with known biasWhy is OLS estimator of AR(1) coefficient biased?Cramer-Rao lower bound for biased estimatorVariance of distribution for maximum likelihood estimator

Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?

Can I still be respawned if I die by falling off the map?

Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

Why is this estimator biased?

Do we have to expect a queue for the shuttle from Watford Junction to Harry Potter Studio?

Why "had" in "[something] we would have made had we used [something]"?

Do the primes contain an infinite almost arithmetic progression?

Store Credit Card Information in Password Manager?

What to do when eye contact makes your subordinate uncomfortable?

Why did the EU agree to delay the Brexit deadline?

What is going on with 'gets(stdin)' on the site coderbyte?

Solve the following system of equations - (3)

What are the balance implications behind making invisible things auto-hide?

What features enable the Su-25 Frogfoot to operate with such a wide variety of fuels?

Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?

Plot of a tornado-shaped surface

Can a college of swords bard use blade flourish on an OA from dissonant whispers?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character

Quoting Keynes in a lecture

Angel of Condemnation - Exile creature with second ability

Add big quotation marks inside my colorbox

Probability that THHT occurs in a sequence of 10 coin tosses



Why is this estimator biased?


How do I check for bias of an estimator?Bootstrap confidence interval for a biased estimatorConceptual question about bias of an estimatorEstimator, unbiased or biasedCalculating risk for a density estimatorLinear model with biased estimatorBias Correction for Estimator with known biasWhy is OLS estimator of AR(1) coefficient biased?Cramer-Rao lower bound for biased estimatorVariance of distribution for maximum likelihood estimator













1












$begingroup$


$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    48 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    40 mins ago















1












$begingroup$


$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    48 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    40 mins ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




$X_1,X_2,..,X_n$ are iid $sim Poisson(mu)$



than the MLE for $theta=e^-mu$ is $hat theta =e^-bar x$



Why is this considered to be biased for $theta$?



Is $E[hat theta]$ not $theta$ ?



as



$E[bar x]= mu$







estimation poisson-distribution bias






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 54 mins ago









QualityQuality

29019




29019







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    48 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    40 mins ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
    $endgroup$
    – The Laconic
    48 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    40 mins ago







3




3




$begingroup$
E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
$endgroup$
– The Laconic
48 mins ago





$begingroup$
E[f(X)] != f(E[X]) in general.
$endgroup$
– The Laconic
48 mins ago













$begingroup$
I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
$endgroup$
– Quality
40 mins ago




$begingroup$
I know that general result but I am still confused how to do it here since the sum of poisson is also poisson with mean $n mu$
$endgroup$
– Quality
40 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
$$
E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
$$

for all $s in mathbbR$



Proof.
We just compute:
$$
beginaligned
E[e^s X]
&= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
&= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
&= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
&= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
endaligned
$$

We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
$$
widehattheta
= expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
= prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
$$

then, using independence,
$$
beginaligned
E[widehattheta]
&= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
&= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
&= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
&neq e^-mu,
endaligned
$$

so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, makes perfect sense
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    26 mins ago


















2












$begingroup$

As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



$$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



, provided the expectations exist.



Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398954%2fwhy-is-this-estimator-biased%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      26 mins ago















    3












    $begingroup$

    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      26 mins ago













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Recall that the moment generating function of $X sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ is
    $$
    E[e^s X] = exp(mu(e^s - 1))
    $$

    for all $s in mathbbR$



    Proof.
    We just compute:
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[e^s X]
    &= sum_k=0^infty e^s k e^-mu fracmu^kk! \
    &= e^-mu sum_k=0^infty fracleft(mu e^sright)^kk! \
    &= e^-mu e^mu e^s \
    &= exp(mu(e^s - 1)).
    endaligned
    $$

    We will use this result with $s = -1/n$.



    If $X_1, ldots, X_n sim operatornamePoisson(mu)$ are i.i.d. and
    $$
    widehattheta
    = expleft(-frac1n sum_i=1^n X_iright)
    = prod_i=1^n expleft(-fracX_inright),
    $$

    then, using independence,
    $$
    beginaligned
    E[widehattheta]
    &= prod_i=1^n Eleft[e^-X_i / nright] \
    &= prod_i=1^n exp(mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &= exp(n mu(e^-1/n - 1)) \
    &neq e^-mu,
    endaligned
    $$

    so $widehattheta$ is not an unbiased estimator of $e^-mu$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 30 mins ago









    Artem MavrinArtem Mavrin

    1,066710




    1,066710











    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      26 mins ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Thank you, makes perfect sense
      $endgroup$
      – Quality
      26 mins ago















    $begingroup$
    Thank you, makes perfect sense
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    26 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    Thank you, makes perfect sense
    $endgroup$
    – Quality
    26 mins ago













    2












    $begingroup$

    As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



    $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



    , provided the expectations exist.



    Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



    The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



      $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



      , provided the expectations exist.



      Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



      The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



        $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



        , provided the expectations exist.



        Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



        The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        As an aside from finding the exact expectation, you can use Jensen's inequality, which says that for a random variable $X$ and a convex function $g$,



        $$Eleft[g(X)right]ge gleft(Eleft[Xright]right)$$



        , provided the expectations exist.



        Verify that $g(x)=e^-x$ is a convex function from the fact that $g''>0$.



        The equality does not hold because $g$ is not an affine function or a constant function.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 25 mins ago









        StubbornAtomStubbornAtom

        2,7671532




        2,7671532



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398954%2fwhy-is-this-estimator-biased%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Saint-André (Pyrenaeus Orientalis) Nexus interni Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisOpenStreetMapGeoNames66168De hoc commune apud cassini.ehess.frHuius communis pagina interretialisAmplifica

            Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

            Montigny (Ligerula) Nexus interni Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisGeoNames45214Amplifica