Is a vector space a subspace of itself?vector space and its subspaceProve: The set of all polynomials p with p(2) = p(3) is a vector spaceProving a vector space over itself have no subspacesVector Space vs SubspaceProving a subset is a subspace of a Vector SpaceAre all vector spaces also a subspace?Understand the definition of a vector subspaceProve that, with vector addition and scalar multiplication well-defined, $V/W$ becomes a vector space over $k$.Is the set of all exponential functions a subspace of the vector space of all continuous functions?I've seen two definitions of subspace; one involving vector spaces and one requiring linear combinations

Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet

Was there ever an axiom rendered a theorem?

How to manage monthly salary

Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?

How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)

Prime joint compound before latex paint?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Crop image to path created in TikZ?

I see my dog run

Pristine Bit Checking

How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Can a planet have a different gravitational pull depending on its location in orbit around its sun?

Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money

Is ipsum/ipsa/ipse a third person pronoun, or can it serve other functions?

Why do we use polarized capacitors?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

Is Social Media Science Fiction?

What is it called when one voice type sings a 'solo'?

Copycat chess is back

What to wear for invited talk in Canada



Is a vector space a subspace of itself?


vector space and its subspaceProve: The set of all polynomials p with p(2) = p(3) is a vector spaceProving a vector space over itself have no subspacesVector Space vs SubspaceProving a subset is a subspace of a Vector SpaceAre all vector spaces also a subspace?Understand the definition of a vector subspaceProve that, with vector addition and scalar multiplication well-defined, $V/W$ becomes a vector space over $k$.Is the set of all exponential functions a subspace of the vector space of all continuous functions?I've seen two definitions of subspace; one involving vector spaces and one requiring linear combinations













1












$begingroup$


We know that a subspace is a vector space that follows the same addition and multiplication rules as $Bbb V$, but is a vector space a subspace of itself?
Also, I'm getting confused doing the practice questions, on when we prove that something is a vector space by using the subspace test and when we prove V1 - V10.






linear-algebra vector-spaces







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you define a subspace of a vector space?
    $endgroup$
    – Brian
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is a set a subset of itself?? What’s V1-V10?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    3 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term "proper" subspace is often used to denote a subspace space that is not the entire vector space.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    As other commenters have noted, your question lacks context. Please edit your question to include more context, lest your question be closed. Please give a definition of a subspace. Please explain what V1 - V10 means. If you are working from a particular text, a citation to that text would be helpful, too.
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    1 hour ago















1












$begingroup$


We know that a subspace is a vector space that follows the same addition and multiplication rules as $Bbb V$, but is a vector space a subspace of itself?
Also, I'm getting confused doing the practice questions, on when we prove that something is a vector space by using the subspace test and when we prove V1 - V10.






linear-algebra vector-spaces







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you define a subspace of a vector space?
    $endgroup$
    – Brian
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is a set a subset of itself?? What’s V1-V10?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    3 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term "proper" subspace is often used to denote a subspace space that is not the entire vector space.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    As other commenters have noted, your question lacks context. Please edit your question to include more context, lest your question be closed. Please give a definition of a subspace. Please explain what V1 - V10 means. If you are working from a particular text, a citation to that text would be helpful, too.
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    1 hour ago













1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


We know that a subspace is a vector space that follows the same addition and multiplication rules as $Bbb V$, but is a vector space a subspace of itself?
Also, I'm getting confused doing the practice questions, on when we prove that something is a vector space by using the subspace test and when we prove V1 - V10.






linear-algebra vector-spaces







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




We know that a subspace is a vector space that follows the same addition and multiplication rules as $Bbb V$, but is a vector space a subspace of itself?
Also, I'm getting confused doing the practice questions, on when we prove that something is a vector space by using the subspace test and when we prove V1 - V10.






linear-algebra vector-spaces




linear-algebra vector-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 22 mins ago









Eric Wofsey

192k14220352




192k14220352










asked 3 hours ago









mingming

4456




4456







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you define a subspace of a vector space?
    $endgroup$
    – Brian
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is a set a subset of itself?? What’s V1-V10?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    3 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term "proper" subspace is often used to denote a subspace space that is not the entire vector space.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    As other commenters have noted, your question lacks context. Please edit your question to include more context, lest your question be closed. Please give a definition of a subspace. Please explain what V1 - V10 means. If you are working from a particular text, a citation to that text would be helpful, too.
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    1 hour ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you define a subspace of a vector space?
    $endgroup$
    – Brian
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is a set a subset of itself?? What’s V1-V10?
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    3 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The term "proper" subspace is often used to denote a subspace space that is not the entire vector space.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    As other commenters have noted, your question lacks context. Please edit your question to include more context, lest your question be closed. Please give a definition of a subspace. Please explain what V1 - V10 means. If you are working from a particular text, a citation to that text would be helpful, too.
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    1 hour ago







1




1




$begingroup$
How do you define a subspace of a vector space?
$endgroup$
– Brian
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
How do you define a subspace of a vector space?
$endgroup$
– Brian
3 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Is a set a subset of itself?? What’s V1-V10?
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
Is a set a subset of itself?? What’s V1-V10?
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
3 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
The term "proper" subspace is often used to denote a subspace space that is not the entire vector space.
$endgroup$
– Theo Bendit
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
The term "proper" subspace is often used to denote a subspace space that is not the entire vector space.
$endgroup$
– Theo Bendit
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
As other commenters have noted, your question lacks context. Please edit your question to include more context, lest your question be closed. Please give a definition of a subspace. Please explain what V1 - V10 means. If you are working from a particular text, a citation to that text would be helpful, too.
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
As other commenters have noted, your question lacks context. Please edit your question to include more context, lest your question be closed. Please give a definition of a subspace. Please explain what V1 - V10 means. If you are working from a particular text, a citation to that text would be helpful, too.
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Yes, every vector space is a vector subspace of itself, since it is a non-empty subset of itself which is closed with respect to addition and with respect to product by scalars.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    I'm guessing that V1 - V10 are the axioms for proving vector spaces.



    To prove something is a vector space, independent of any other vector spaces you know of, you are required to prove all of the axioms in the definition. Not all operations that call themselves $+$ are worthy addition operations; just because you denote it $+$ does not mean it is (for example) associative, or has an additive identity.



    There is a lot to prove, because there's a lot to gain. Vector spaces have a simply enormous amount of structure, and that structure gives us a really rich theory and powerful tools. If you have an object that you wish to understand better, and you can show it is a vector space (or at least, related to a vector space), then you'll instantly have some serious mathematical firepower at your fingertips.



    Subspaces give us a shortcut to proving a vector space. If you have a subset of a known vector space, then you can prove just $3$ properties, rather than $10$. We can skip a lot of the steps because somebody has already done them previously when showing the larger vector space is indeed a vector space. You don't need to show, for example, $v + w = w + v$ for all $v, w$ in your subset, because we already know this is true for all vectors in the larger vector space.



    I'm writing this, not as a direct answer to your question (which Jose Carlos Santos has answered already), but because confusion like this often stems from some sloppiness on the above point. I've seen many students (and, lamentably, several instructors) fail to grasp that showing the subspace conditions on a set that is not clearly a subset of a known vector space does not prove a vector space. The shortcut works because somebody has already established most of the axioms beforehand, but if this is not true, then the argument is a fallacy.



    You can absolutely apply the subspace conditions on the whole of a vector space provided you've proven it's a vector space already with axioms V1 - V10.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180447%2fis-a-vector-space-a-subspace-of-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      7












      $begingroup$

      Yes, every vector space is a vector subspace of itself, since it is a non-empty subset of itself which is closed with respect to addition and with respect to product by scalars.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        7












        $begingroup$

        Yes, every vector space is a vector subspace of itself, since it is a non-empty subset of itself which is closed with respect to addition and with respect to product by scalars.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          Yes, every vector space is a vector subspace of itself, since it is a non-empty subset of itself which is closed with respect to addition and with respect to product by scalars.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Yes, every vector space is a vector subspace of itself, since it is a non-empty subset of itself which is closed with respect to addition and with respect to product by scalars.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

          173k23133241




          173k23133241





















              2












              $begingroup$

              I'm guessing that V1 - V10 are the axioms for proving vector spaces.



              To prove something is a vector space, independent of any other vector spaces you know of, you are required to prove all of the axioms in the definition. Not all operations that call themselves $+$ are worthy addition operations; just because you denote it $+$ does not mean it is (for example) associative, or has an additive identity.



              There is a lot to prove, because there's a lot to gain. Vector spaces have a simply enormous amount of structure, and that structure gives us a really rich theory and powerful tools. If you have an object that you wish to understand better, and you can show it is a vector space (or at least, related to a vector space), then you'll instantly have some serious mathematical firepower at your fingertips.



              Subspaces give us a shortcut to proving a vector space. If you have a subset of a known vector space, then you can prove just $3$ properties, rather than $10$. We can skip a lot of the steps because somebody has already done them previously when showing the larger vector space is indeed a vector space. You don't need to show, for example, $v + w = w + v$ for all $v, w$ in your subset, because we already know this is true for all vectors in the larger vector space.



              I'm writing this, not as a direct answer to your question (which Jose Carlos Santos has answered already), but because confusion like this often stems from some sloppiness on the above point. I've seen many students (and, lamentably, several instructors) fail to grasp that showing the subspace conditions on a set that is not clearly a subset of a known vector space does not prove a vector space. The shortcut works because somebody has already established most of the axioms beforehand, but if this is not true, then the argument is a fallacy.



              You can absolutely apply the subspace conditions on the whole of a vector space provided you've proven it's a vector space already with axioms V1 - V10.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                I'm guessing that V1 - V10 are the axioms for proving vector spaces.



                To prove something is a vector space, independent of any other vector spaces you know of, you are required to prove all of the axioms in the definition. Not all operations that call themselves $+$ are worthy addition operations; just because you denote it $+$ does not mean it is (for example) associative, or has an additive identity.



                There is a lot to prove, because there's a lot to gain. Vector spaces have a simply enormous amount of structure, and that structure gives us a really rich theory and powerful tools. If you have an object that you wish to understand better, and you can show it is a vector space (or at least, related to a vector space), then you'll instantly have some serious mathematical firepower at your fingertips.



                Subspaces give us a shortcut to proving a vector space. If you have a subset of a known vector space, then you can prove just $3$ properties, rather than $10$. We can skip a lot of the steps because somebody has already done them previously when showing the larger vector space is indeed a vector space. You don't need to show, for example, $v + w = w + v$ for all $v, w$ in your subset, because we already know this is true for all vectors in the larger vector space.



                I'm writing this, not as a direct answer to your question (which Jose Carlos Santos has answered already), but because confusion like this often stems from some sloppiness on the above point. I've seen many students (and, lamentably, several instructors) fail to grasp that showing the subspace conditions on a set that is not clearly a subset of a known vector space does not prove a vector space. The shortcut works because somebody has already established most of the axioms beforehand, but if this is not true, then the argument is a fallacy.



                You can absolutely apply the subspace conditions on the whole of a vector space provided you've proven it's a vector space already with axioms V1 - V10.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  I'm guessing that V1 - V10 are the axioms for proving vector spaces.



                  To prove something is a vector space, independent of any other vector spaces you know of, you are required to prove all of the axioms in the definition. Not all operations that call themselves $+$ are worthy addition operations; just because you denote it $+$ does not mean it is (for example) associative, or has an additive identity.



                  There is a lot to prove, because there's a lot to gain. Vector spaces have a simply enormous amount of structure, and that structure gives us a really rich theory and powerful tools. If you have an object that you wish to understand better, and you can show it is a vector space (or at least, related to a vector space), then you'll instantly have some serious mathematical firepower at your fingertips.



                  Subspaces give us a shortcut to proving a vector space. If you have a subset of a known vector space, then you can prove just $3$ properties, rather than $10$. We can skip a lot of the steps because somebody has already done them previously when showing the larger vector space is indeed a vector space. You don't need to show, for example, $v + w = w + v$ for all $v, w$ in your subset, because we already know this is true for all vectors in the larger vector space.



                  I'm writing this, not as a direct answer to your question (which Jose Carlos Santos has answered already), but because confusion like this often stems from some sloppiness on the above point. I've seen many students (and, lamentably, several instructors) fail to grasp that showing the subspace conditions on a set that is not clearly a subset of a known vector space does not prove a vector space. The shortcut works because somebody has already established most of the axioms beforehand, but if this is not true, then the argument is a fallacy.



                  You can absolutely apply the subspace conditions on the whole of a vector space provided you've proven it's a vector space already with axioms V1 - V10.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I'm guessing that V1 - V10 are the axioms for proving vector spaces.



                  To prove something is a vector space, independent of any other vector spaces you know of, you are required to prove all of the axioms in the definition. Not all operations that call themselves $+$ are worthy addition operations; just because you denote it $+$ does not mean it is (for example) associative, or has an additive identity.



                  There is a lot to prove, because there's a lot to gain. Vector spaces have a simply enormous amount of structure, and that structure gives us a really rich theory and powerful tools. If you have an object that you wish to understand better, and you can show it is a vector space (or at least, related to a vector space), then you'll instantly have some serious mathematical firepower at your fingertips.



                  Subspaces give us a shortcut to proving a vector space. If you have a subset of a known vector space, then you can prove just $3$ properties, rather than $10$. We can skip a lot of the steps because somebody has already done them previously when showing the larger vector space is indeed a vector space. You don't need to show, for example, $v + w = w + v$ for all $v, w$ in your subset, because we already know this is true for all vectors in the larger vector space.



                  I'm writing this, not as a direct answer to your question (which Jose Carlos Santos has answered already), but because confusion like this often stems from some sloppiness on the above point. I've seen many students (and, lamentably, several instructors) fail to grasp that showing the subspace conditions on a set that is not clearly a subset of a known vector space does not prove a vector space. The shortcut works because somebody has already established most of the axioms beforehand, but if this is not true, then the argument is a fallacy.



                  You can absolutely apply the subspace conditions on the whole of a vector space provided you've proven it's a vector space already with axioms V1 - V10.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  Theo BenditTheo Bendit

                  20.7k12354




                  20.7k12354



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3180447%2fis-a-vector-space-a-subspace-of-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Dapidodigma demeter Subspecies | Notae | Tabula navigationisDapidodigmaAfrotropical Butterflies: Lycaenidae - Subtribe IolainaAmplifica

                      Image
                      CheritriniSpecies insectorum ex rebus mythologicis appellataeTaxa ClenchTaxa 1961 papiliofamiliaeLycaenidarumLitore EburneoGanaBeninoNigeriaCameroniaRepublica CongensiSudaniaAngoliaRepublica Democratica CongensiZambiaUgandaendemicusHabitatiosilvisLarvaespeciebusformicis Dapidodigma demeter Taxinomia Regnum: Animalia Phylum: Arthropoda Classis: Insecta Ordo: Lepidoptera Familia: Lycaenidae Genus: Dapidodigma Species: D. demeter Binomen Dapidodigma demeter Clench, 1961 [1] Dapidodigma demeter est papilio familiae Lycaenidarum, in Litore Eburneo, Gana, Benino, Nigeria, Cameronia, Republica Congensi, Sudania, Angolia, Republica Democratica Congensi, Zambia, et Uganda endemicus. [2] Habitatio in silvis consistit. Larvae speciebus Albiziae et Homalii vescuntur. Larvae et pupae a formicis curantur. Subspecies | Dapidodigma demeter demeter (Litus Eburneum, Gana, Beninum, Nigeria, Cameronia, Congo) Dapidodigma demeter nuptus Clench, 1961 (Angolia, Zambia, Uganda, Respublica Democratica
                      Read more

                      Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

                      Image
                      ViriNati 1925Mortui 2012Auctores RussiciIncolae MoscuaeIncolae Unionis SovieticaeParticipes secundi belli mundaniPoetae RussiaeScriptores Russiae Russicetr.17 Decembris1925Moscuae15 Decembris2012SovieticusRussicusЯ люблю тебя, жизнь Constantinus Vanšenkin Res apud Vicidata repertae: Nativitas : 17 Decembris 1925 ; Moscua Obitus : 15 Decembris 2012 ; Moscua Patria : Unio Sovietica , Russia Officium Munus : Poëta , Scriptor , Auctor textus musici , Auctor carminum Consociatio Factio : Factio Communistica Unionis Sovieticae Memoria Laurae : USSR State Prize , Medal "For the Victory over Germany in the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945" , Order of the Badge of Honour , Order of the Patriotic War 2nd class , Order "For Merit to the Fatherland" IV class , Order of the Red Banner of Labour , Order of Friendship of Peoples , Medal "For the Capture of Vienna" , Medal "For Strengthening of Brotherhood in Arms" Sepultura : Vagankovo Cemetery Constantinus Iac
                      Read more

                      Gaius Norbanus Flaccus (consul 38 a.C.n.) Index De gente | De cursu honorum | Notae | Fontes | Si vis plura legere | Tabula navigationisHic legere potes

                      Image
                      ViriNati saeculo 1 a.C.n.Mortui saeculo 1 a.C.n.ConsulesProconsules Asiae senator RomanusconsulatumtriumphavitOctaviani Caesarisconsulis anni 83 a.C.n.Marianarum partiumSyllaproscriptusRhodotriumvir monetalisdenariosNorbaPraetor43 a.C.n.triumvirorum42 a.C.n.Lucio Decidio SaxalegionesMacedoniamThraciamSexto PompeioStaio MurcoGnaeo DomitioVia EgnatiaPhilipposAmphipolimtriumvirisproconsul36 a.C.n.triumphum31 a.C.n.proconsul Asiae Gaius Norbanus Flaccus , natus mortuusque primo saeculo a.C.n., fuit senator Romanus qui consulatum anno 38 a.C.n. gessit, anno 34 a.C.n. triumphavit. Bello civili fautor Octaviani Caesaris fuit. Index 1 De gente 2 De cursu honorum 3 Notae 4 Fontes 5 Si vis plura legere De gente | Gaius Norbanus nepos consulis anni 83 a.C.n. vulgo habetur qui homo novus et Marianarum partium dux a Sylla victus et proscriptus tandem se in insula Rhodo ipse necavit. Tunc pater eius triumvir monetalis fuisse videtur qui denarios [1] quosdam circa eundem annum 83 a.C.n. cude
                      Read more