Usage of an old photo with expired copyrightWhat's “fair use” for borrowing someone else's invented term?Are music lyrics copyrighted?How to publish public domain books?Does copyright law let me publish my detailed notes of someone else's speech?Use of copyright across nationscopyright issues and permissionsHow to license my translation to be published under my copyright?Is copyright implied when you self publish?Can I quote an infamous line from a satire written in the 18th century in my novel?At what point is permission needed to reference meta-characters and works in my own?

How were servants to the Kaiser of Imperial Germany treated and where may I find more information on them

Why is the principal energy of an electron lower for excited electrons in a higher energy state?

How do I fix the group tension caused by my character stealing and possibly killing without provocation?

Check if object is null and return null

How would a solely written language work mechanically

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?

Difference between shutdown options

Typing CO_2 easily

Would a primitive species be able to learn English from reading books alone?

How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?

Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience

How do I Interface a PS/2 Keyboard without Modern Techniques?

Can I run 125kHz RF circuit on a breadboard?

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Language involving irrational number is not a CFL

When and why was runway 07/25 at Kai Tak removed?

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

How to leave product feedback on macOS?

What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?

Unable to disable Microsoft Store in domain environment

Why didn't Voldemort know what Grindelwald looked like?



Usage of an old photo with expired copyright


What's “fair use” for borrowing someone else's invented term?Are music lyrics copyrighted?How to publish public domain books?Does copyright law let me publish my detailed notes of someone else's speech?Use of copyright across nationscopyright issues and permissionsHow to license my translation to be published under my copyright?Is copyright implied when you self publish?Can I quote an infamous line from a satire written in the 18th century in my novel?At what point is permission needed to reference meta-characters and works in my own?













2















I would like to use an old photo/postcard (example 1, example 2) for a non-commercial poster. The photo would illustrate a map. The copyright of the original photo has already expired.



However, since someone else has scanned the photo, do I require explicitly permission from the "file owner" beside citing the source?



I am residing in Canada.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Do you know if the copy you have has benefitted from any digital enhancement? Did the person who scanned it clean it up at all?

    – Monica Cellio
    2 hours ago











  • Unfortunately I don't know. I don't think so but I can't be sure. It's actually the two linked photos I would like to add to the poster.

    – Thomas Zuberbühler
    2 hours ago











  • Unless carefully stored away from sunlight, silver haliod prints lose some detail over time - fading in the sun. That one looks like it was either restored or kept away from sunlight

    – Rasdashan
    2 hours ago















2















I would like to use an old photo/postcard (example 1, example 2) for a non-commercial poster. The photo would illustrate a map. The copyright of the original photo has already expired.



However, since someone else has scanned the photo, do I require explicitly permission from the "file owner" beside citing the source?



I am residing in Canada.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Do you know if the copy you have has benefitted from any digital enhancement? Did the person who scanned it clean it up at all?

    – Monica Cellio
    2 hours ago











  • Unfortunately I don't know. I don't think so but I can't be sure. It's actually the two linked photos I would like to add to the poster.

    – Thomas Zuberbühler
    2 hours ago











  • Unless carefully stored away from sunlight, silver haliod prints lose some detail over time - fading in the sun. That one looks like it was either restored or kept away from sunlight

    – Rasdashan
    2 hours ago













2












2








2








I would like to use an old photo/postcard (example 1, example 2) for a non-commercial poster. The photo would illustrate a map. The copyright of the original photo has already expired.



However, since someone else has scanned the photo, do I require explicitly permission from the "file owner" beside citing the source?



I am residing in Canada.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I would like to use an old photo/postcard (example 1, example 2) for a non-commercial poster. The photo would illustrate a map. The copyright of the original photo has already expired.



However, since someone else has scanned the photo, do I require explicitly permission from the "file owner" beside citing the source?



I am residing in Canada.







copyright artwork international






share|improve this question









New contributor




Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 46 mins ago









Cyn

14.5k13272




14.5k13272






New contributor




Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









Thomas ZuberbühlerThomas Zuberbühler

1135




1135




New contributor




Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Do you know if the copy you have has benefitted from any digital enhancement? Did the person who scanned it clean it up at all?

    – Monica Cellio
    2 hours ago











  • Unfortunately I don't know. I don't think so but I can't be sure. It's actually the two linked photos I would like to add to the poster.

    – Thomas Zuberbühler
    2 hours ago











  • Unless carefully stored away from sunlight, silver haliod prints lose some detail over time - fading in the sun. That one looks like it was either restored or kept away from sunlight

    – Rasdashan
    2 hours ago

















  • Do you know if the copy you have has benefitted from any digital enhancement? Did the person who scanned it clean it up at all?

    – Monica Cellio
    2 hours ago











  • Unfortunately I don't know. I don't think so but I can't be sure. It's actually the two linked photos I would like to add to the poster.

    – Thomas Zuberbühler
    2 hours ago











  • Unless carefully stored away from sunlight, silver haliod prints lose some detail over time - fading in the sun. That one looks like it was either restored or kept away from sunlight

    – Rasdashan
    2 hours ago
















Do you know if the copy you have has benefitted from any digital enhancement? Did the person who scanned it clean it up at all?

– Monica Cellio
2 hours ago





Do you know if the copy you have has benefitted from any digital enhancement? Did the person who scanned it clean it up at all?

– Monica Cellio
2 hours ago













Unfortunately I don't know. I don't think so but I can't be sure. It's actually the two linked photos I would like to add to the poster.

– Thomas Zuberbühler
2 hours ago





Unfortunately I don't know. I don't think so but I can't be sure. It's actually the two linked photos I would like to add to the poster.

– Thomas Zuberbühler
2 hours ago













Unless carefully stored away from sunlight, silver haliod prints lose some detail over time - fading in the sun. That one looks like it was either restored or kept away from sunlight

– Rasdashan
2 hours ago





Unless carefully stored away from sunlight, silver haliod prints lose some detail over time - fading in the sun. That one looks like it was either restored or kept away from sunlight

– Rasdashan
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















0














Follow the rules set out on the page you want to copy from.



The railway schedule is part of the Bob MacIntosh Collection.




Bob has given the DARDPI wiki permission to use his image collection
and for individuals to enjoy them for their own personal study of the
D.A.R. Bob MacIntosh reserves all rights on his image collection for
any commercial use and forbids the use of these images on any other
site without his express permission.




The train picture comes from a book, Canadian Pacific's Dominion Atlantic Railway, Vol 2.




Both volumes are 26 pages inside. Each 8 1/2 x 11 page is a full sized
photograph with description. Nearly every photo is the first time in
print. Excellent photos and excellent details on the descriptions.




You can't just say "oh the copyright has expired" because you don't know if that's true. Items do pass into the public domain but not necessarily in straight-forward ways. For example the train schedule itself is almost certainly public domain (and probably was never copyrighted) but the scan or photo of it belongs to the person who took it. Which was a lot more recently (and might be Bob MacIntosh). Just like a picture of an old public building belongs to the person who took it.



The train picture is from the 1920's but the one on the site belongs to Ken McIlvoy. If you could get another original, you'd maybe be fine. In the US, anything from 1923 or earlier, that otherwise would have qualified for public domain, is now in the public domain. For other works, it can be a lot more complicated. In Canada, works enter public domain 50 years after the death of the artist/writer. I would not assume that the photographer died before 1969, or that the copyright has lapsed for any other reason.



But what you want to use is a photo of that photo. Here's what Canadian law has to say about that:




Many websites provide access to digital reproductions of works that
are in the Public Domain. For instance, the websites of museums and
art galleries often include online collections of images, and many of
these images depict manuscripts, paintings, sculptures, and other
creative works that are in the Public Domain.



Although the act of digitizing a Public Domain work is not itself
sufficient to create a new, copyrighted version of the original work,
it is important to exercise caution when using such digital
reproductions, as they are often made available subject to terms and
conditions in legally enforceable license agreements.



More specifically, if a website’s terms of use specifically restrict
the ways in which you can use the website’s content, then these
restrictions would prevail over your right to use that content in
accordance with the Copyright Act. For example, if a museum’s website
includes an image of a painting that is in the Public Domain, but the
website’s terms of use prohibit you from copying or distributing the
image, then you must abide by this restriction.




In other words, follow the rules of the page you got it from. If you aren't sure, ask.






share|improve this answer






























    2














    Contacting a legal professional familiar with Canadian copyright law is strongly advised - The act of scanning a work frequently establishes a new copyright of that scan, and is not something easily decided by a quick paragraph from a random website. So while you may scan a public domain document and freely use it as you wish, you often can't download someone else's scan of the same document.



    Also, keep in mind the dates involved! You would want to be very careful on looking into the image in question and the actual legal standing of copyright on material from that era.



    • Canadian copyright is currently established as 50 years After The Death Of the Creator. The 20's may be covered by a different law that would allow an earlier expiry on the copyright, but you would have to be sure the photographer passed away before the 60s to safely assume the image has lapsed into public domain here.

    And you would also have to check if the rights were defined by Canadian law - If the image was actually produced by someone from another country, they potentially took the rights back to that country when they left and may be respected under copyright treaty.



    All that said, contacting the hosts to track down any copyright holder and asking permission is likely your best bet in any case, just do your best to confirm that whoever actually holds the rights is giving you permission - Holding the photo isn't the same as the copyright.






    share|improve this answer
































      1














      That photograph is very clean for such a vintage photo. I used photoshop to clean up my grandparents’ wedding photo and ended up with a result with the same clarity. Ninety two years dropped away and details emerged that had seemed to have been lost.



      I would suggest contacting the person who scanned it. If they did clean it up, that is quite the task and deserves the respect of an inquiry. Just ask their permission.



      It says that it is described in a book, so it has been used before.






      share|improve this answer






















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "166"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43836%2fusage-of-an-old-photo-with-expired-copyright%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        0














        Follow the rules set out on the page you want to copy from.



        The railway schedule is part of the Bob MacIntosh Collection.




        Bob has given the DARDPI wiki permission to use his image collection
        and for individuals to enjoy them for their own personal study of the
        D.A.R. Bob MacIntosh reserves all rights on his image collection for
        any commercial use and forbids the use of these images on any other
        site without his express permission.




        The train picture comes from a book, Canadian Pacific's Dominion Atlantic Railway, Vol 2.




        Both volumes are 26 pages inside. Each 8 1/2 x 11 page is a full sized
        photograph with description. Nearly every photo is the first time in
        print. Excellent photos and excellent details on the descriptions.




        You can't just say "oh the copyright has expired" because you don't know if that's true. Items do pass into the public domain but not necessarily in straight-forward ways. For example the train schedule itself is almost certainly public domain (and probably was never copyrighted) but the scan or photo of it belongs to the person who took it. Which was a lot more recently (and might be Bob MacIntosh). Just like a picture of an old public building belongs to the person who took it.



        The train picture is from the 1920's but the one on the site belongs to Ken McIlvoy. If you could get another original, you'd maybe be fine. In the US, anything from 1923 or earlier, that otherwise would have qualified for public domain, is now in the public domain. For other works, it can be a lot more complicated. In Canada, works enter public domain 50 years after the death of the artist/writer. I would not assume that the photographer died before 1969, or that the copyright has lapsed for any other reason.



        But what you want to use is a photo of that photo. Here's what Canadian law has to say about that:




        Many websites provide access to digital reproductions of works that
        are in the Public Domain. For instance, the websites of museums and
        art galleries often include online collections of images, and many of
        these images depict manuscripts, paintings, sculptures, and other
        creative works that are in the Public Domain.



        Although the act of digitizing a Public Domain work is not itself
        sufficient to create a new, copyrighted version of the original work,
        it is important to exercise caution when using such digital
        reproductions, as they are often made available subject to terms and
        conditions in legally enforceable license agreements.



        More specifically, if a website’s terms of use specifically restrict
        the ways in which you can use the website’s content, then these
        restrictions would prevail over your right to use that content in
        accordance with the Copyright Act. For example, if a museum’s website
        includes an image of a painting that is in the Public Domain, but the
        website’s terms of use prohibit you from copying or distributing the
        image, then you must abide by this restriction.




        In other words, follow the rules of the page you got it from. If you aren't sure, ask.






        share|improve this answer



























          0














          Follow the rules set out on the page you want to copy from.



          The railway schedule is part of the Bob MacIntosh Collection.




          Bob has given the DARDPI wiki permission to use his image collection
          and for individuals to enjoy them for their own personal study of the
          D.A.R. Bob MacIntosh reserves all rights on his image collection for
          any commercial use and forbids the use of these images on any other
          site without his express permission.




          The train picture comes from a book, Canadian Pacific's Dominion Atlantic Railway, Vol 2.




          Both volumes are 26 pages inside. Each 8 1/2 x 11 page is a full sized
          photograph with description. Nearly every photo is the first time in
          print. Excellent photos and excellent details on the descriptions.




          You can't just say "oh the copyright has expired" because you don't know if that's true. Items do pass into the public domain but not necessarily in straight-forward ways. For example the train schedule itself is almost certainly public domain (and probably was never copyrighted) but the scan or photo of it belongs to the person who took it. Which was a lot more recently (and might be Bob MacIntosh). Just like a picture of an old public building belongs to the person who took it.



          The train picture is from the 1920's but the one on the site belongs to Ken McIlvoy. If you could get another original, you'd maybe be fine. In the US, anything from 1923 or earlier, that otherwise would have qualified for public domain, is now in the public domain. For other works, it can be a lot more complicated. In Canada, works enter public domain 50 years after the death of the artist/writer. I would not assume that the photographer died before 1969, or that the copyright has lapsed for any other reason.



          But what you want to use is a photo of that photo. Here's what Canadian law has to say about that:




          Many websites provide access to digital reproductions of works that
          are in the Public Domain. For instance, the websites of museums and
          art galleries often include online collections of images, and many of
          these images depict manuscripts, paintings, sculptures, and other
          creative works that are in the Public Domain.



          Although the act of digitizing a Public Domain work is not itself
          sufficient to create a new, copyrighted version of the original work,
          it is important to exercise caution when using such digital
          reproductions, as they are often made available subject to terms and
          conditions in legally enforceable license agreements.



          More specifically, if a website’s terms of use specifically restrict
          the ways in which you can use the website’s content, then these
          restrictions would prevail over your right to use that content in
          accordance with the Copyright Act. For example, if a museum’s website
          includes an image of a painting that is in the Public Domain, but the
          website’s terms of use prohibit you from copying or distributing the
          image, then you must abide by this restriction.




          In other words, follow the rules of the page you got it from. If you aren't sure, ask.






          share|improve this answer

























            0












            0








            0







            Follow the rules set out on the page you want to copy from.



            The railway schedule is part of the Bob MacIntosh Collection.




            Bob has given the DARDPI wiki permission to use his image collection
            and for individuals to enjoy them for their own personal study of the
            D.A.R. Bob MacIntosh reserves all rights on his image collection for
            any commercial use and forbids the use of these images on any other
            site without his express permission.




            The train picture comes from a book, Canadian Pacific's Dominion Atlantic Railway, Vol 2.




            Both volumes are 26 pages inside. Each 8 1/2 x 11 page is a full sized
            photograph with description. Nearly every photo is the first time in
            print. Excellent photos and excellent details on the descriptions.




            You can't just say "oh the copyright has expired" because you don't know if that's true. Items do pass into the public domain but not necessarily in straight-forward ways. For example the train schedule itself is almost certainly public domain (and probably was never copyrighted) but the scan or photo of it belongs to the person who took it. Which was a lot more recently (and might be Bob MacIntosh). Just like a picture of an old public building belongs to the person who took it.



            The train picture is from the 1920's but the one on the site belongs to Ken McIlvoy. If you could get another original, you'd maybe be fine. In the US, anything from 1923 or earlier, that otherwise would have qualified for public domain, is now in the public domain. For other works, it can be a lot more complicated. In Canada, works enter public domain 50 years after the death of the artist/writer. I would not assume that the photographer died before 1969, or that the copyright has lapsed for any other reason.



            But what you want to use is a photo of that photo. Here's what Canadian law has to say about that:




            Many websites provide access to digital reproductions of works that
            are in the Public Domain. For instance, the websites of museums and
            art galleries often include online collections of images, and many of
            these images depict manuscripts, paintings, sculptures, and other
            creative works that are in the Public Domain.



            Although the act of digitizing a Public Domain work is not itself
            sufficient to create a new, copyrighted version of the original work,
            it is important to exercise caution when using such digital
            reproductions, as they are often made available subject to terms and
            conditions in legally enforceable license agreements.



            More specifically, if a website’s terms of use specifically restrict
            the ways in which you can use the website’s content, then these
            restrictions would prevail over your right to use that content in
            accordance with the Copyright Act. For example, if a museum’s website
            includes an image of a painting that is in the Public Domain, but the
            website’s terms of use prohibit you from copying or distributing the
            image, then you must abide by this restriction.




            In other words, follow the rules of the page you got it from. If you aren't sure, ask.






            share|improve this answer













            Follow the rules set out on the page you want to copy from.



            The railway schedule is part of the Bob MacIntosh Collection.




            Bob has given the DARDPI wiki permission to use his image collection
            and for individuals to enjoy them for their own personal study of the
            D.A.R. Bob MacIntosh reserves all rights on his image collection for
            any commercial use and forbids the use of these images on any other
            site without his express permission.




            The train picture comes from a book, Canadian Pacific's Dominion Atlantic Railway, Vol 2.




            Both volumes are 26 pages inside. Each 8 1/2 x 11 page is a full sized
            photograph with description. Nearly every photo is the first time in
            print. Excellent photos and excellent details on the descriptions.




            You can't just say "oh the copyright has expired" because you don't know if that's true. Items do pass into the public domain but not necessarily in straight-forward ways. For example the train schedule itself is almost certainly public domain (and probably was never copyrighted) but the scan or photo of it belongs to the person who took it. Which was a lot more recently (and might be Bob MacIntosh). Just like a picture of an old public building belongs to the person who took it.



            The train picture is from the 1920's but the one on the site belongs to Ken McIlvoy. If you could get another original, you'd maybe be fine. In the US, anything from 1923 or earlier, that otherwise would have qualified for public domain, is now in the public domain. For other works, it can be a lot more complicated. In Canada, works enter public domain 50 years after the death of the artist/writer. I would not assume that the photographer died before 1969, or that the copyright has lapsed for any other reason.



            But what you want to use is a photo of that photo. Here's what Canadian law has to say about that:




            Many websites provide access to digital reproductions of works that
            are in the Public Domain. For instance, the websites of museums and
            art galleries often include online collections of images, and many of
            these images depict manuscripts, paintings, sculptures, and other
            creative works that are in the Public Domain.



            Although the act of digitizing a Public Domain work is not itself
            sufficient to create a new, copyrighted version of the original work,
            it is important to exercise caution when using such digital
            reproductions, as they are often made available subject to terms and
            conditions in legally enforceable license agreements.



            More specifically, if a website’s terms of use specifically restrict
            the ways in which you can use the website’s content, then these
            restrictions would prevail over your right to use that content in
            accordance with the Copyright Act. For example, if a museum’s website
            includes an image of a painting that is in the Public Domain, but the
            website’s terms of use prohibit you from copying or distributing the
            image, then you must abide by this restriction.




            In other words, follow the rules of the page you got it from. If you aren't sure, ask.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 47 mins ago









            CynCyn

            14.5k13272




            14.5k13272





















                2














                Contacting a legal professional familiar with Canadian copyright law is strongly advised - The act of scanning a work frequently establishes a new copyright of that scan, and is not something easily decided by a quick paragraph from a random website. So while you may scan a public domain document and freely use it as you wish, you often can't download someone else's scan of the same document.



                Also, keep in mind the dates involved! You would want to be very careful on looking into the image in question and the actual legal standing of copyright on material from that era.



                • Canadian copyright is currently established as 50 years After The Death Of the Creator. The 20's may be covered by a different law that would allow an earlier expiry on the copyright, but you would have to be sure the photographer passed away before the 60s to safely assume the image has lapsed into public domain here.

                And you would also have to check if the rights were defined by Canadian law - If the image was actually produced by someone from another country, they potentially took the rights back to that country when they left and may be respected under copyright treaty.



                All that said, contacting the hosts to track down any copyright holder and asking permission is likely your best bet in any case, just do your best to confirm that whoever actually holds the rights is giving you permission - Holding the photo isn't the same as the copyright.






                share|improve this answer





























                  2














                  Contacting a legal professional familiar with Canadian copyright law is strongly advised - The act of scanning a work frequently establishes a new copyright of that scan, and is not something easily decided by a quick paragraph from a random website. So while you may scan a public domain document and freely use it as you wish, you often can't download someone else's scan of the same document.



                  Also, keep in mind the dates involved! You would want to be very careful on looking into the image in question and the actual legal standing of copyright on material from that era.



                  • Canadian copyright is currently established as 50 years After The Death Of the Creator. The 20's may be covered by a different law that would allow an earlier expiry on the copyright, but you would have to be sure the photographer passed away before the 60s to safely assume the image has lapsed into public domain here.

                  And you would also have to check if the rights were defined by Canadian law - If the image was actually produced by someone from another country, they potentially took the rights back to that country when they left and may be respected under copyright treaty.



                  All that said, contacting the hosts to track down any copyright holder and asking permission is likely your best bet in any case, just do your best to confirm that whoever actually holds the rights is giving you permission - Holding the photo isn't the same as the copyright.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    2












                    2








                    2







                    Contacting a legal professional familiar with Canadian copyright law is strongly advised - The act of scanning a work frequently establishes a new copyright of that scan, and is not something easily decided by a quick paragraph from a random website. So while you may scan a public domain document and freely use it as you wish, you often can't download someone else's scan of the same document.



                    Also, keep in mind the dates involved! You would want to be very careful on looking into the image in question and the actual legal standing of copyright on material from that era.



                    • Canadian copyright is currently established as 50 years After The Death Of the Creator. The 20's may be covered by a different law that would allow an earlier expiry on the copyright, but you would have to be sure the photographer passed away before the 60s to safely assume the image has lapsed into public domain here.

                    And you would also have to check if the rights were defined by Canadian law - If the image was actually produced by someone from another country, they potentially took the rights back to that country when they left and may be respected under copyright treaty.



                    All that said, contacting the hosts to track down any copyright holder and asking permission is likely your best bet in any case, just do your best to confirm that whoever actually holds the rights is giving you permission - Holding the photo isn't the same as the copyright.






                    share|improve this answer















                    Contacting a legal professional familiar with Canadian copyright law is strongly advised - The act of scanning a work frequently establishes a new copyright of that scan, and is not something easily decided by a quick paragraph from a random website. So while you may scan a public domain document and freely use it as you wish, you often can't download someone else's scan of the same document.



                    Also, keep in mind the dates involved! You would want to be very careful on looking into the image in question and the actual legal standing of copyright on material from that era.



                    • Canadian copyright is currently established as 50 years After The Death Of the Creator. The 20's may be covered by a different law that would allow an earlier expiry on the copyright, but you would have to be sure the photographer passed away before the 60s to safely assume the image has lapsed into public domain here.

                    And you would also have to check if the rights were defined by Canadian law - If the image was actually produced by someone from another country, they potentially took the rights back to that country when they left and may be respected under copyright treaty.



                    All that said, contacting the hosts to track down any copyright holder and asking permission is likely your best bet in any case, just do your best to confirm that whoever actually holds the rights is giving you permission - Holding the photo isn't the same as the copyright.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 1 hour ago

























                    answered 1 hour ago









                    TheLucklessTheLuckless

                    3894




                    3894





















                        1














                        That photograph is very clean for such a vintage photo. I used photoshop to clean up my grandparents’ wedding photo and ended up with a result with the same clarity. Ninety two years dropped away and details emerged that had seemed to have been lost.



                        I would suggest contacting the person who scanned it. If they did clean it up, that is quite the task and deserves the respect of an inquiry. Just ask their permission.



                        It says that it is described in a book, so it has been used before.






                        share|improve this answer



























                          1














                          That photograph is very clean for such a vintage photo. I used photoshop to clean up my grandparents’ wedding photo and ended up with a result with the same clarity. Ninety two years dropped away and details emerged that had seemed to have been lost.



                          I would suggest contacting the person who scanned it. If they did clean it up, that is quite the task and deserves the respect of an inquiry. Just ask their permission.



                          It says that it is described in a book, so it has been used before.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            1












                            1








                            1







                            That photograph is very clean for such a vintage photo. I used photoshop to clean up my grandparents’ wedding photo and ended up with a result with the same clarity. Ninety two years dropped away and details emerged that had seemed to have been lost.



                            I would suggest contacting the person who scanned it. If they did clean it up, that is quite the task and deserves the respect of an inquiry. Just ask their permission.



                            It says that it is described in a book, so it has been used before.






                            share|improve this answer













                            That photograph is very clean for such a vintage photo. I used photoshop to clean up my grandparents’ wedding photo and ended up with a result with the same clarity. Ninety two years dropped away and details emerged that had seemed to have been lost.



                            I would suggest contacting the person who scanned it. If they did clean it up, that is quite the task and deserves the respect of an inquiry. Just ask their permission.



                            It says that it is described in a book, so it has been used before.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 2 hours ago









                            RasdashanRasdashan

                            7,9691152




                            7,9691152




















                                Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Thomas Zuberbühler is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43836%2fusage-of-an-old-photo-with-expired-copyright%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Dapidodigma demeter Subspecies | Notae | Tabula navigationisDapidodigmaAfrotropical Butterflies: Lycaenidae - Subtribe IolainaAmplifica

                                Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

                                Gaius Norbanus Flaccus (consul 38 a.C.n.) Index De gente | De cursu honorum | Notae | Fontes | Si vis plura legere | Tabula navigationisHic legere potes