Alternatives to OverleafOverleaf adding of .tex fileDoes listfiles work on Overleaf?Overleaf shortcuts don't work in vim modeWeird Typesetting on OverleafOverleaf back to v1avm.sty-related errors in Overleaf v. 2Overleaf ftp access?Exporting from overleafOverleaf Import .asyOverleaf v2 saving versions?
Why do Computer Science majors learn Calculus?
Do vanished people know what happened after the snap?
How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?
Single Colour Mastermind Problem
Sci-fi book: portals appear in London and send a failed artist towards a designated path where he operate a giant superweapon
Is it possible to dynamically set properties of an `Object` using Apex?
How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?
how to interpret this t result?
Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
Does this extra sentence in the description of the warlock's Eyes of the Rune Keeper eldritch invocation appear in any official reference?
Error message with tabularx
Examples of non trivial equivalence relations , I mean equivalence relations without the expression " same ... as" in their definition?
How do Bards prepare spells?
How to make a pipeline wait for end-of-file or stop after an error?
Why the difference in metal between 銀行 and お金?
Can someone publish a story that happened to you?
Mac Pro install disk keeps ejecting itself
How to back up a running remote server?
Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?
Realistic Necromancy?
French for 'It must be my imagination'?
Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?
Can not tell colimits from limits
Alternatives to Overleaf
Overleaf adding of .tex fileDoes listfiles work on Overleaf?Overleaf shortcuts don't work in vim modeWeird Typesetting on OverleafOverleaf back to v1avm.sty-related errors in Overleaf v. 2Overleaf ftp access?Exporting from overleafOverleaf Import .asyOverleaf v2 saving versions?
The best thing about Overleaf V1 was that I could log into it without an account. This made it possible to share things with people who most likely wouldn't be big TEX users and to whom the idea of working in "code" is scary.
Now having a login, any login, is a impediment for this. If I can show them to the result and TEX markup side by side then I have a chance, however small, for them to read it and see that it's not that fancy.
So my question is is there a workable alternative to the new Overleaf? A tool that has no login requirements, so that I can directly link to the source to updating result view, with edit support for casual users coming in the first time. And with no confusing login requirements, not even ones you can circumvent.
overleaf
New contributor
add a comment |
The best thing about Overleaf V1 was that I could log into it without an account. This made it possible to share things with people who most likely wouldn't be big TEX users and to whom the idea of working in "code" is scary.
Now having a login, any login, is a impediment for this. If I can show them to the result and TEX markup side by side then I have a chance, however small, for them to read it and see that it's not that fancy.
So my question is is there a workable alternative to the new Overleaf? A tool that has no login requirements, so that I can directly link to the source to updating result view, with edit support for casual users coming in the first time. And with no confusing login requirements, not even ones you can circumvent.
overleaf
New contributor
It's not entirely clear to me if you want editing or just viewing, but if just viewing, then you can do that with Overleaf via the Share button. (It looks like editing should also be possible, but that didn't work for me.)
– Torbjørn T.
2 hours ago
@TorbjørnT. Editing would go a long way so that users can verify that ist not so painful
– joojaa
2 hours ago
add a comment |
The best thing about Overleaf V1 was that I could log into it without an account. This made it possible to share things with people who most likely wouldn't be big TEX users and to whom the idea of working in "code" is scary.
Now having a login, any login, is a impediment for this. If I can show them to the result and TEX markup side by side then I have a chance, however small, for them to read it and see that it's not that fancy.
So my question is is there a workable alternative to the new Overleaf? A tool that has no login requirements, so that I can directly link to the source to updating result view, with edit support for casual users coming in the first time. And with no confusing login requirements, not even ones you can circumvent.
overleaf
New contributor
The best thing about Overleaf V1 was that I could log into it without an account. This made it possible to share things with people who most likely wouldn't be big TEX users and to whom the idea of working in "code" is scary.
Now having a login, any login, is a impediment for this. If I can show them to the result and TEX markup side by side then I have a chance, however small, for them to read it and see that it's not that fancy.
So my question is is there a workable alternative to the new Overleaf? A tool that has no login requirements, so that I can directly link to the source to updating result view, with edit support for casual users coming in the first time. And with no confusing login requirements, not even ones you can circumvent.
overleaf
overleaf
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 hours ago
joojaa
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
joojaajoojaa
1064
1064
New contributor
New contributor
It's not entirely clear to me if you want editing or just viewing, but if just viewing, then you can do that with Overleaf via the Share button. (It looks like editing should also be possible, but that didn't work for me.)
– Torbjørn T.
2 hours ago
@TorbjørnT. Editing would go a long way so that users can verify that ist not so painful
– joojaa
2 hours ago
add a comment |
It's not entirely clear to me if you want editing or just viewing, but if just viewing, then you can do that with Overleaf via the Share button. (It looks like editing should also be possible, but that didn't work for me.)
– Torbjørn T.
2 hours ago
@TorbjørnT. Editing would go a long way so that users can verify that ist not so painful
– joojaa
2 hours ago
It's not entirely clear to me if you want editing or just viewing, but if just viewing, then you can do that with Overleaf via the Share button. (It looks like editing should also be possible, but that didn't work for me.)
– Torbjørn T.
2 hours ago
It's not entirely clear to me if you want editing or just viewing, but if just viewing, then you can do that with Overleaf via the Share button. (It looks like editing should also be possible, but that didn't work for me.)
– Torbjørn T.
2 hours ago
@TorbjørnT. Editing would go a long way so that users can verify that ist not so painful
– joojaa
2 hours ago
@TorbjørnT. Editing would go a long way so that users can verify that ist not so painful
– joojaa
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Log date 2019 (always changing market)
The bigger players once they reach a certain point (success) do not want the headaches associated with random demo users so will simply mention Overleaf Authorea, CoCalc and Datazar seem to have big enough freemium/paying customer bases. There is a separate Big List which includes other products such as Google Docx2LaTeX, verbosus and similar browser plug-ins.
This Answer (Small List) is confined to current free access online without dependency on any install.
It is the smaller freemium players that are left behind trying to get a better share of the market.
Currently a few without registration live latex editing landing page editors are
https://papeeria.com/ (TeX Live default 2015 but can opt to use 2016)
https://latexbase.com/ (Limited number of Main Packages but can work in offline mode
Troy Henderson's
http://www.tlhiv.org/ltxpreview/ (more recent large range of 2017 packages)
There is a very up-to-date (LuaTeX, Version 1.10.0 (TeX Live 2019)
ConTeXt online compiler at https://live.contextgarden.net/
Also but heavily biased to user hitting adverts (CodingGround serving Tex Live 2016) https://www.tutorialspoint.com/online_latex_editor.php
Hybrids (can switch from simplistic equation editor to Latex syntax)
In minimal or full latex mode will require documentclass but may be limited to PNG rather than PDF output
https://www.latex4technics.com/ (older packages may fail, good for simple PNG output)
http://sciencesoft.at/latex/?lang=en (can store tex and pdf online for sharing)
http://sciencesoft.at/latex/index?ochem=true&lang=en (specialist OCHEM-LaTeX)
Smaller equation editors (some possibly should be included above ?)
https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php
https://latex.informatik.uni-halle.de/latex-online/latex.php
https://tex.mendelu.cz/en/
continues
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
joojaa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f488049%2falternatives-to-overleaf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Log date 2019 (always changing market)
The bigger players once they reach a certain point (success) do not want the headaches associated with random demo users so will simply mention Overleaf Authorea, CoCalc and Datazar seem to have big enough freemium/paying customer bases. There is a separate Big List which includes other products such as Google Docx2LaTeX, verbosus and similar browser plug-ins.
This Answer (Small List) is confined to current free access online without dependency on any install.
It is the smaller freemium players that are left behind trying to get a better share of the market.
Currently a few without registration live latex editing landing page editors are
https://papeeria.com/ (TeX Live default 2015 but can opt to use 2016)
https://latexbase.com/ (Limited number of Main Packages but can work in offline mode
Troy Henderson's
http://www.tlhiv.org/ltxpreview/ (more recent large range of 2017 packages)
There is a very up-to-date (LuaTeX, Version 1.10.0 (TeX Live 2019)
ConTeXt online compiler at https://live.contextgarden.net/
Also but heavily biased to user hitting adverts (CodingGround serving Tex Live 2016) https://www.tutorialspoint.com/online_latex_editor.php
Hybrids (can switch from simplistic equation editor to Latex syntax)
In minimal or full latex mode will require documentclass but may be limited to PNG rather than PDF output
https://www.latex4technics.com/ (older packages may fail, good for simple PNG output)
http://sciencesoft.at/latex/?lang=en (can store tex and pdf online for sharing)
http://sciencesoft.at/latex/index?ochem=true&lang=en (specialist OCHEM-LaTeX)
Smaller equation editors (some possibly should be included above ?)
https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php
https://latex.informatik.uni-halle.de/latex-online/latex.php
https://tex.mendelu.cz/en/
continues
add a comment |
Log date 2019 (always changing market)
The bigger players once they reach a certain point (success) do not want the headaches associated with random demo users so will simply mention Overleaf Authorea, CoCalc and Datazar seem to have big enough freemium/paying customer bases. There is a separate Big List which includes other products such as Google Docx2LaTeX, verbosus and similar browser plug-ins.
This Answer (Small List) is confined to current free access online without dependency on any install.
It is the smaller freemium players that are left behind trying to get a better share of the market.
Currently a few without registration live latex editing landing page editors are
https://papeeria.com/ (TeX Live default 2015 but can opt to use 2016)
https://latexbase.com/ (Limited number of Main Packages but can work in offline mode
Troy Henderson's
http://www.tlhiv.org/ltxpreview/ (more recent large range of 2017 packages)
There is a very up-to-date (LuaTeX, Version 1.10.0 (TeX Live 2019)
ConTeXt online compiler at https://live.contextgarden.net/
Also but heavily biased to user hitting adverts (CodingGround serving Tex Live 2016) https://www.tutorialspoint.com/online_latex_editor.php
Hybrids (can switch from simplistic equation editor to Latex syntax)
In minimal or full latex mode will require documentclass but may be limited to PNG rather than PDF output
https://www.latex4technics.com/ (older packages may fail, good for simple PNG output)
http://sciencesoft.at/latex/?lang=en (can store tex and pdf online for sharing)
http://sciencesoft.at/latex/index?ochem=true&lang=en (specialist OCHEM-LaTeX)
Smaller equation editors (some possibly should be included above ?)
https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php
https://latex.informatik.uni-halle.de/latex-online/latex.php
https://tex.mendelu.cz/en/
continues
add a comment |
Log date 2019 (always changing market)
The bigger players once they reach a certain point (success) do not want the headaches associated with random demo users so will simply mention Overleaf Authorea, CoCalc and Datazar seem to have big enough freemium/paying customer bases. There is a separate Big List which includes other products such as Google Docx2LaTeX, verbosus and similar browser plug-ins.
This Answer (Small List) is confined to current free access online without dependency on any install.
It is the smaller freemium players that are left behind trying to get a better share of the market.
Currently a few without registration live latex editing landing page editors are
https://papeeria.com/ (TeX Live default 2015 but can opt to use 2016)
https://latexbase.com/ (Limited number of Main Packages but can work in offline mode
Troy Henderson's
http://www.tlhiv.org/ltxpreview/ (more recent large range of 2017 packages)
There is a very up-to-date (LuaTeX, Version 1.10.0 (TeX Live 2019)
ConTeXt online compiler at https://live.contextgarden.net/
Also but heavily biased to user hitting adverts (CodingGround serving Tex Live 2016) https://www.tutorialspoint.com/online_latex_editor.php
Hybrids (can switch from simplistic equation editor to Latex syntax)
In minimal or full latex mode will require documentclass but may be limited to PNG rather than PDF output
https://www.latex4technics.com/ (older packages may fail, good for simple PNG output)
http://sciencesoft.at/latex/?lang=en (can store tex and pdf online for sharing)
http://sciencesoft.at/latex/index?ochem=true&lang=en (specialist OCHEM-LaTeX)
Smaller equation editors (some possibly should be included above ?)
https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php
https://latex.informatik.uni-halle.de/latex-online/latex.php
https://tex.mendelu.cz/en/
continues
Log date 2019 (always changing market)
The bigger players once they reach a certain point (success) do not want the headaches associated with random demo users so will simply mention Overleaf Authorea, CoCalc and Datazar seem to have big enough freemium/paying customer bases. There is a separate Big List which includes other products such as Google Docx2LaTeX, verbosus and similar browser plug-ins.
This Answer (Small List) is confined to current free access online without dependency on any install.
It is the smaller freemium players that are left behind trying to get a better share of the market.
Currently a few without registration live latex editing landing page editors are
https://papeeria.com/ (TeX Live default 2015 but can opt to use 2016)
https://latexbase.com/ (Limited number of Main Packages but can work in offline mode
Troy Henderson's
http://www.tlhiv.org/ltxpreview/ (more recent large range of 2017 packages)
There is a very up-to-date (LuaTeX, Version 1.10.0 (TeX Live 2019)
ConTeXt online compiler at https://live.contextgarden.net/
Also but heavily biased to user hitting adverts (CodingGround serving Tex Live 2016) https://www.tutorialspoint.com/online_latex_editor.php
Hybrids (can switch from simplistic equation editor to Latex syntax)
In minimal or full latex mode will require documentclass but may be limited to PNG rather than PDF output
https://www.latex4technics.com/ (older packages may fail, good for simple PNG output)
http://sciencesoft.at/latex/?lang=en (can store tex and pdf online for sharing)
http://sciencesoft.at/latex/index?ochem=true&lang=en (specialist OCHEM-LaTeX)
Smaller equation editors (some possibly should be included above ?)
https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php
https://latex.informatik.uni-halle.de/latex-online/latex.php
https://tex.mendelu.cz/en/
continues
edited 11 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
KJOKJO
4,1451223
4,1451223
add a comment |
add a comment |
joojaa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
joojaa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
joojaa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
joojaa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f488049%2falternatives-to-overleaf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It's not entirely clear to me if you want editing or just viewing, but if just viewing, then you can do that with Overleaf via the Share button. (It looks like editing should also be possible, but that didn't work for me.)
– Torbjørn T.
2 hours ago
@TorbjørnT. Editing would go a long way so that users can verify that ist not so painful
– joojaa
2 hours ago