Alternatives to OverleafOverleaf adding of .tex fileDoes listfiles work on Overleaf?Overleaf shortcuts don't work in vim modeWeird Typesetting on OverleafOverleaf back to v1avm.sty-related errors in Overleaf v. 2Overleaf ftp access?Exporting from overleafOverleaf Import .asyOverleaf v2 saving versions?

Why do Computer Science majors learn Calculus?

Do vanished people know what happened after the snap?

How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?

Single Colour Mastermind Problem

Sci-fi book: portals appear in London and send a failed artist towards a designated path where he operate a giant superweapon

Is it possible to dynamically set properties of an `Object` using Apex?

How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?

how to interpret this t result?

Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"

Why does nature favour the Laplacian?

Does this extra sentence in the description of the warlock's Eyes of the Rune Keeper eldritch invocation appear in any official reference?

Error message with tabularx

Examples of non trivial equivalence relations , I mean equivalence relations without the expression " same ... as" in their definition?

How do Bards prepare spells?

How to make a pipeline wait for end-of-file or stop after an error?

Why the difference in metal between 銀行 and お金?

Can someone publish a story that happened to you?

Mac Pro install disk keeps ejecting itself

How to back up a running remote server?

Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?

Realistic Necromancy?

French for 'It must be my imagination'?

Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?

Can not tell colimits from limits



Alternatives to Overleaf


Overleaf adding of .tex fileDoes listfiles work on Overleaf?Overleaf shortcuts don't work in vim modeWeird Typesetting on OverleafOverleaf back to v1avm.sty-related errors in Overleaf v. 2Overleaf ftp access?Exporting from overleafOverleaf Import .asyOverleaf v2 saving versions?













1















The best thing about Overleaf V1 was that I could log into it without an account. This made it possible to share things with people who most likely wouldn't be big TEX users and to whom the idea of working in "code" is scary.



Now having a login, any login, is a impediment for this. If I can show them to the result and TEX markup side by side then I have a chance, however small, for them to read it and see that it's not that fancy.



So my question is is there a workable alternative to the new Overleaf? A tool that has no login requirements, so that I can directly link to the source to updating result view, with edit support for casual users coming in the first time. And with no confusing login requirements, not even ones you can circumvent.










share|improve this question









New contributor




joojaa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • It's not entirely clear to me if you want editing or just viewing, but if just viewing, then you can do that with Overleaf via the Share button. (It looks like editing should also be possible, but that didn't work for me.)

    – Torbjørn T.
    2 hours ago












  • @TorbjørnT. Editing would go a long way so that users can verify that ist not so painful

    – joojaa
    2 hours ago















1















The best thing about Overleaf V1 was that I could log into it without an account. This made it possible to share things with people who most likely wouldn't be big TEX users and to whom the idea of working in "code" is scary.



Now having a login, any login, is a impediment for this. If I can show them to the result and TEX markup side by side then I have a chance, however small, for them to read it and see that it's not that fancy.



So my question is is there a workable alternative to the new Overleaf? A tool that has no login requirements, so that I can directly link to the source to updating result view, with edit support for casual users coming in the first time. And with no confusing login requirements, not even ones you can circumvent.










share|improve this question









New contributor




joojaa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • It's not entirely clear to me if you want editing or just viewing, but if just viewing, then you can do that with Overleaf via the Share button. (It looks like editing should also be possible, but that didn't work for me.)

    – Torbjørn T.
    2 hours ago












  • @TorbjørnT. Editing would go a long way so that users can verify that ist not so painful

    – joojaa
    2 hours ago













1












1








1








The best thing about Overleaf V1 was that I could log into it without an account. This made it possible to share things with people who most likely wouldn't be big TEX users and to whom the idea of working in "code" is scary.



Now having a login, any login, is a impediment for this. If I can show them to the result and TEX markup side by side then I have a chance, however small, for them to read it and see that it's not that fancy.



So my question is is there a workable alternative to the new Overleaf? A tool that has no login requirements, so that I can directly link to the source to updating result view, with edit support for casual users coming in the first time. And with no confusing login requirements, not even ones you can circumvent.










share|improve this question









New contributor




joojaa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












The best thing about Overleaf V1 was that I could log into it without an account. This made it possible to share things with people who most likely wouldn't be big TEX users and to whom the idea of working in "code" is scary.



Now having a login, any login, is a impediment for this. If I can show them to the result and TEX markup side by side then I have a chance, however small, for them to read it and see that it's not that fancy.



So my question is is there a workable alternative to the new Overleaf? A tool that has no login requirements, so that I can directly link to the source to updating result view, with edit support for casual users coming in the first time. And with no confusing login requirements, not even ones you can circumvent.







overleaf






share|improve this question









New contributor




joojaa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




joojaa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago







joojaa













New contributor




joojaa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









joojaajoojaa

1064




1064




New contributor




joojaa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





joojaa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






joojaa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • It's not entirely clear to me if you want editing or just viewing, but if just viewing, then you can do that with Overleaf via the Share button. (It looks like editing should also be possible, but that didn't work for me.)

    – Torbjørn T.
    2 hours ago












  • @TorbjørnT. Editing would go a long way so that users can verify that ist not so painful

    – joojaa
    2 hours ago

















  • It's not entirely clear to me if you want editing or just viewing, but if just viewing, then you can do that with Overleaf via the Share button. (It looks like editing should also be possible, but that didn't work for me.)

    – Torbjørn T.
    2 hours ago












  • @TorbjørnT. Editing would go a long way so that users can verify that ist not so painful

    – joojaa
    2 hours ago
















It's not entirely clear to me if you want editing or just viewing, but if just viewing, then you can do that with Overleaf via the Share button. (It looks like editing should also be possible, but that didn't work for me.)

– Torbjørn T.
2 hours ago






It's not entirely clear to me if you want editing or just viewing, but if just viewing, then you can do that with Overleaf via the Share button. (It looks like editing should also be possible, but that didn't work for me.)

– Torbjørn T.
2 hours ago














@TorbjørnT. Editing would go a long way so that users can verify that ist not so painful

– joojaa
2 hours ago





@TorbjørnT. Editing would go a long way so that users can verify that ist not so painful

– joojaa
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














Log date 2019 (always changing market)



The bigger players once they reach a certain point (success) do not want the headaches associated with random demo users so will simply mention Overleaf Authorea, CoCalc and Datazar seem to have big enough freemium/paying customer bases. There is a separate Big List which includes other products such as Google Docx2LaTeX, verbosus and similar browser plug-ins.



This Answer (Small List) is confined to current free access online without dependency on any install.



It is the smaller freemium players that are left behind trying to get a better share of the market.



Currently a few without registration live latex editing landing page editors are



https://papeeria.com/ (TeX Live default 2015 but can opt to use 2016)



https://latexbase.com/ (Limited number of Main Packages but can work in offline mode



Troy Henderson's
http://www.tlhiv.org/ltxpreview/ (more recent large range of 2017 packages)



There is a very up-to-date (LuaTeX, Version 1.10.0 (TeX Live 2019)
ConTeXt online compiler at https://live.contextgarden.net/



Also but heavily biased to user hitting adverts (CodingGround serving Tex Live 2016) https://www.tutorialspoint.com/online_latex_editor.php



Hybrids (can switch from simplistic equation editor to Latex syntax)
In minimal or full latex mode will require documentclass but may be limited to PNG rather than PDF output



https://www.latex4technics.com/ (older packages may fail, good for simple PNG output)
http://sciencesoft.at/latex/?lang=en (can store tex and pdf online for sharing)
http://sciencesoft.at/latex/index?ochem=true&lang=en (specialist OCHEM-LaTeX)



Smaller equation editors (some possibly should be included above ?)



https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php



https://latex.informatik.uni-halle.de/latex-online/latex.php
https://tex.mendelu.cz/en/



continues






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    joojaa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f488049%2falternatives-to-overleaf%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    Log date 2019 (always changing market)



    The bigger players once they reach a certain point (success) do not want the headaches associated with random demo users so will simply mention Overleaf Authorea, CoCalc and Datazar seem to have big enough freemium/paying customer bases. There is a separate Big List which includes other products such as Google Docx2LaTeX, verbosus and similar browser plug-ins.



    This Answer (Small List) is confined to current free access online without dependency on any install.



    It is the smaller freemium players that are left behind trying to get a better share of the market.



    Currently a few without registration live latex editing landing page editors are



    https://papeeria.com/ (TeX Live default 2015 but can opt to use 2016)



    https://latexbase.com/ (Limited number of Main Packages but can work in offline mode



    Troy Henderson's
    http://www.tlhiv.org/ltxpreview/ (more recent large range of 2017 packages)



    There is a very up-to-date (LuaTeX, Version 1.10.0 (TeX Live 2019)
    ConTeXt online compiler at https://live.contextgarden.net/



    Also but heavily biased to user hitting adverts (CodingGround serving Tex Live 2016) https://www.tutorialspoint.com/online_latex_editor.php



    Hybrids (can switch from simplistic equation editor to Latex syntax)
    In minimal or full latex mode will require documentclass but may be limited to PNG rather than PDF output



    https://www.latex4technics.com/ (older packages may fail, good for simple PNG output)
    http://sciencesoft.at/latex/?lang=en (can store tex and pdf online for sharing)
    http://sciencesoft.at/latex/index?ochem=true&lang=en (specialist OCHEM-LaTeX)



    Smaller equation editors (some possibly should be included above ?)



    https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php



    https://latex.informatik.uni-halle.de/latex-online/latex.php
    https://tex.mendelu.cz/en/



    continues






    share|improve this answer





























      4














      Log date 2019 (always changing market)



      The bigger players once they reach a certain point (success) do not want the headaches associated with random demo users so will simply mention Overleaf Authorea, CoCalc and Datazar seem to have big enough freemium/paying customer bases. There is a separate Big List which includes other products such as Google Docx2LaTeX, verbosus and similar browser plug-ins.



      This Answer (Small List) is confined to current free access online without dependency on any install.



      It is the smaller freemium players that are left behind trying to get a better share of the market.



      Currently a few without registration live latex editing landing page editors are



      https://papeeria.com/ (TeX Live default 2015 but can opt to use 2016)



      https://latexbase.com/ (Limited number of Main Packages but can work in offline mode



      Troy Henderson's
      http://www.tlhiv.org/ltxpreview/ (more recent large range of 2017 packages)



      There is a very up-to-date (LuaTeX, Version 1.10.0 (TeX Live 2019)
      ConTeXt online compiler at https://live.contextgarden.net/



      Also but heavily biased to user hitting adverts (CodingGround serving Tex Live 2016) https://www.tutorialspoint.com/online_latex_editor.php



      Hybrids (can switch from simplistic equation editor to Latex syntax)
      In minimal or full latex mode will require documentclass but may be limited to PNG rather than PDF output



      https://www.latex4technics.com/ (older packages may fail, good for simple PNG output)
      http://sciencesoft.at/latex/?lang=en (can store tex and pdf online for sharing)
      http://sciencesoft.at/latex/index?ochem=true&lang=en (specialist OCHEM-LaTeX)



      Smaller equation editors (some possibly should be included above ?)



      https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php



      https://latex.informatik.uni-halle.de/latex-online/latex.php
      https://tex.mendelu.cz/en/



      continues






      share|improve this answer



























        4












        4








        4







        Log date 2019 (always changing market)



        The bigger players once they reach a certain point (success) do not want the headaches associated with random demo users so will simply mention Overleaf Authorea, CoCalc and Datazar seem to have big enough freemium/paying customer bases. There is a separate Big List which includes other products such as Google Docx2LaTeX, verbosus and similar browser plug-ins.



        This Answer (Small List) is confined to current free access online without dependency on any install.



        It is the smaller freemium players that are left behind trying to get a better share of the market.



        Currently a few without registration live latex editing landing page editors are



        https://papeeria.com/ (TeX Live default 2015 but can opt to use 2016)



        https://latexbase.com/ (Limited number of Main Packages but can work in offline mode



        Troy Henderson's
        http://www.tlhiv.org/ltxpreview/ (more recent large range of 2017 packages)



        There is a very up-to-date (LuaTeX, Version 1.10.0 (TeX Live 2019)
        ConTeXt online compiler at https://live.contextgarden.net/



        Also but heavily biased to user hitting adverts (CodingGround serving Tex Live 2016) https://www.tutorialspoint.com/online_latex_editor.php



        Hybrids (can switch from simplistic equation editor to Latex syntax)
        In minimal or full latex mode will require documentclass but may be limited to PNG rather than PDF output



        https://www.latex4technics.com/ (older packages may fail, good for simple PNG output)
        http://sciencesoft.at/latex/?lang=en (can store tex and pdf online for sharing)
        http://sciencesoft.at/latex/index?ochem=true&lang=en (specialist OCHEM-LaTeX)



        Smaller equation editors (some possibly should be included above ?)



        https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php



        https://latex.informatik.uni-halle.de/latex-online/latex.php
        https://tex.mendelu.cz/en/



        continues






        share|improve this answer















        Log date 2019 (always changing market)



        The bigger players once they reach a certain point (success) do not want the headaches associated with random demo users so will simply mention Overleaf Authorea, CoCalc and Datazar seem to have big enough freemium/paying customer bases. There is a separate Big List which includes other products such as Google Docx2LaTeX, verbosus and similar browser plug-ins.



        This Answer (Small List) is confined to current free access online without dependency on any install.



        It is the smaller freemium players that are left behind trying to get a better share of the market.



        Currently a few without registration live latex editing landing page editors are



        https://papeeria.com/ (TeX Live default 2015 but can opt to use 2016)



        https://latexbase.com/ (Limited number of Main Packages but can work in offline mode



        Troy Henderson's
        http://www.tlhiv.org/ltxpreview/ (more recent large range of 2017 packages)



        There is a very up-to-date (LuaTeX, Version 1.10.0 (TeX Live 2019)
        ConTeXt online compiler at https://live.contextgarden.net/



        Also but heavily biased to user hitting adverts (CodingGround serving Tex Live 2016) https://www.tutorialspoint.com/online_latex_editor.php



        Hybrids (can switch from simplistic equation editor to Latex syntax)
        In minimal or full latex mode will require documentclass but may be limited to PNG rather than PDF output



        https://www.latex4technics.com/ (older packages may fail, good for simple PNG output)
        http://sciencesoft.at/latex/?lang=en (can store tex and pdf online for sharing)
        http://sciencesoft.at/latex/index?ochem=true&lang=en (specialist OCHEM-LaTeX)



        Smaller equation editors (some possibly should be included above ?)



        https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php



        https://latex.informatik.uni-halle.de/latex-online/latex.php
        https://tex.mendelu.cz/en/



        continues







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 11 mins ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        KJOKJO

        4,1451223




        4,1451223




















            joojaa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            joojaa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            joojaa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            joojaa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f488049%2falternatives-to-overleaf%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Dapidodigma demeter Subspecies | Notae | Tabula navigationisDapidodigmaAfrotropical Butterflies: Lycaenidae - Subtribe IolainaAmplifica

            Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

            Gaius Norbanus Flaccus (consul 38 a.C.n.) Index De gente | De cursu honorum | Notae | Fontes | Si vis plura legere | Tabula navigationisHic legere potes