infinitely many negative and infinitely many positive numbersIs $k^2+k+1$ prime for infinitely many values of $k$?Diverging to Positive and Negative InfinityHow prove a sequence has infinitely many square numbers.infinitely descending natural numbersUse this sequence to prove that there are infinitely many prime numbers.Can decreasing sequence of sets with $A_i$ containing infinitely less elements than $A_i-1$ have finite limit?Show that this sequence contains infinitely many composite numbers.How do I rigorously show a sequence of positive real numbers converges to a non-negative real number?Series and positive sequenceDoes some Lucas sequence contain infinitely many primes?

How to write a column outside the braces in a matrix?

Is there any official lore on the Far Realm?

Classification of surfaces

What is the philosophical significance of speech acts/implicature?

How to fry ground beef so it is well-browned

Should the Death Curse affect an undead PC in the Tomb of Annihilation adventure?

How to not starve gigantic beasts

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

Can someone publish a story that happened to you?

Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?

What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?

How to pronounce 'c++' in Spanish

Aligning equation numbers vertically

What does ゆーか mean?

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?

acheter à, to mean both "from" and "for"?

Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?

Does Gita support doctrine of eternal samsara?

Don’t seats that recline flat defeat the purpose of having seatbelts?

Two field separators (colon and space) in awk

If a planet has 3 moons, is it possible to have triple Full/New Moons at once?

Does tea made with boiling water cool faster than tea made with boiled (but still hot) water?

What happened to Captain America in Endgame?

What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?



infinitely many negative and infinitely many positive numbers


Is $k^2+k+1$ prime for infinitely many values of $k$?Diverging to Positive and Negative InfinityHow prove a sequence has infinitely many square numbers.infinitely descending natural numbersUse this sequence to prove that there are infinitely many prime numbers.Can decreasing sequence of sets with $A_i$ containing infinitely less elements than $A_i-1$ have finite limit?Show that this sequence contains infinitely many composite numbers.How do I rigorously show a sequence of positive real numbers converges to a non-negative real number?Series and positive sequenceDoes some Lucas sequence contain infinitely many primes?













2












$begingroup$


Suppose that
$$x_1=frac14, x_n+1=x_n^3-3x_n.$$



Show that the sequence has infinitely many negative and infinitely many positive numbers.



My idea: Suppose that it has finitely many negative numbers. then all the numbers after some index, must be larger than $sqrt3$. I want to show that the sequence cannot escape some interval.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Suppose that
    $$x_1=frac14, x_n+1=x_n^3-3x_n.$$



    Show that the sequence has infinitely many negative and infinitely many positive numbers.



    My idea: Suppose that it has finitely many negative numbers. then all the numbers after some index, must be larger than $sqrt3$. I want to show that the sequence cannot escape some interval.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      2



      $begingroup$


      Suppose that
      $$x_1=frac14, x_n+1=x_n^3-3x_n.$$



      Show that the sequence has infinitely many negative and infinitely many positive numbers.



      My idea: Suppose that it has finitely many negative numbers. then all the numbers after some index, must be larger than $sqrt3$. I want to show that the sequence cannot escape some interval.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose that
      $$x_1=frac14, x_n+1=x_n^3-3x_n.$$



      Show that the sequence has infinitely many negative and infinitely many positive numbers.



      My idea: Suppose that it has finitely many negative numbers. then all the numbers after some index, must be larger than $sqrt3$. I want to show that the sequence cannot escape some interval.







      sequences-and-series polynomials






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 7 hours ago









      S_AlexS_Alex

      21219




      21219




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          You have essentially the right idea. Here are some hints to help you complete your proof.



          Let $f(x) = x^3 - 3x $.



          1. Show that $x_n in ( -2, 2 ). $


          2. Show that if $ x in (0, sqrt3)$, then $f(x) < 0 $.


          3. Show that if $x in ( sqrt3 , 2 )$, then $ 0 < f(x) < x$.

            This tells us that the values will decrease. However, do they decrease enough?


          4. Show that if $ x in ( sqrt3 ,2 )$, then there eixsts an $n$ such that $ f^n(x) < sqrt3$.

            This tells us that the values decrease enough to force a negative value, $f^n+1 (x)$.



          Note: There are multiple ways of doing 4. If you are stuck, consider $ frac 2 - f(x) 2 - x $. This tells you how quickly you're moving away from 2 (and hence will be less than $sqrt3$ eventually.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            For part (1), if $x_n=-1$ then $x_n+1=2$ and $x_i=2$ for all $i>n+1$. We need also to show $x_n$ does not get the value $-1$.
            $endgroup$
            – S_Alex
            6 hours ago


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Let $f(x) = x^3 - 3x$ and explore, for which $x$ one has
          $$
          |f'(x)| < 1.
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            0












            $begingroup$

            Notice that for $alpha>0$:



            $$(2+alpha)^3-3(2+alpha)=2+9alpha+6alpha^2+alpha^3>2+alpha$$
            while for $betain[0,2]$:
            $$(2-beta)^3-3(2-beta)=2-9beta+6beta^2-beta^3<2-beta$$



            The opposite arguments can be made around $-2$. Since $x_1in[-2,-2]$, your iteration is restricted to this range






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              0












              $begingroup$

              The desired claim follows from the following two observations:




              Claim. If $x_n in -1/4, 1/4$, then $x_n neq 0$ for all $n geq 1$.




              Proof. Let $p_1 = operatornamesign(x_1)$ and $p_n+1 = p_n^3 - 3p_n 4^2 cdot 3^n-1$. Then we inductively check that $p_n$ is always odd and $ x_n = p_n / 4^3^n-1$. Since the numerator is always odd integer, it cannot vanish, and the claim follows.




              Claim 2. If either $x_n geq 0$ for any sufficiently large $n$ or $x_n leq 0$ for any sufficiently $n$, then we actually have $x_n = 0$ for any sufficiently large $n$.




              Proof. Write $x_n = 2cos(2 pi f_n)$. Then



              $$ cos(2 pi f_n+1) = fracx_n+12 = fracx_n^3 - 3x_n2 = 4cos^3(2 pi f_n) - 3cos(2 pi f_n) = cos(2 pi cdot 3f_n). $$



              So it follows that $cos(2pi f_N+n) = cos(2pi cdot 3^n f_N)$. Now, replacing $(x_n)$ by $(-x_n)$ if necessary, we may assume that $x_n geq 0$ for all sufficiently large $n$. In other words, there exists $N$ so that $x_N+n geq 0$ for all $n geq 0$. Then each $3^n f_N$ must avoid the sets $(frac14, frac34) + mathbbZ$. So it follows that



              $$ f_N in mathbbR setminus bigcup_n=0^infty bigcup_kinmathbbZ left( frac4k+14 cdot 3^n, frac4k+34 cdot 3^n right) = left k pm frac14cdot 3^n : n geq 0 right. $$



              This implies that $3^n_0 f_N = pm 1$ for some $n_0 geq 0$, and hence $x_N+n = 0$ for all $n geq n_0$. This proves the desired claim.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3203826%2finfinitely-many-negative-and-infinitely-many-positive-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                3












                $begingroup$

                You have essentially the right idea. Here are some hints to help you complete your proof.



                Let $f(x) = x^3 - 3x $.



                1. Show that $x_n in ( -2, 2 ). $


                2. Show that if $ x in (0, sqrt3)$, then $f(x) < 0 $.


                3. Show that if $x in ( sqrt3 , 2 )$, then $ 0 < f(x) < x$.

                  This tells us that the values will decrease. However, do they decrease enough?


                4. Show that if $ x in ( sqrt3 ,2 )$, then there eixsts an $n$ such that $ f^n(x) < sqrt3$.

                  This tells us that the values decrease enough to force a negative value, $f^n+1 (x)$.



                Note: There are multiple ways of doing 4. If you are stuck, consider $ frac 2 - f(x) 2 - x $. This tells you how quickly you're moving away from 2 (and hence will be less than $sqrt3$ eventually.)






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$












                • $begingroup$
                  For part (1), if $x_n=-1$ then $x_n+1=2$ and $x_i=2$ for all $i>n+1$. We need also to show $x_n$ does not get the value $-1$.
                  $endgroup$
                  – S_Alex
                  6 hours ago















                3












                $begingroup$

                You have essentially the right idea. Here are some hints to help you complete your proof.



                Let $f(x) = x^3 - 3x $.



                1. Show that $x_n in ( -2, 2 ). $


                2. Show that if $ x in (0, sqrt3)$, then $f(x) < 0 $.


                3. Show that if $x in ( sqrt3 , 2 )$, then $ 0 < f(x) < x$.

                  This tells us that the values will decrease. However, do they decrease enough?


                4. Show that if $ x in ( sqrt3 ,2 )$, then there eixsts an $n$ such that $ f^n(x) < sqrt3$.

                  This tells us that the values decrease enough to force a negative value, $f^n+1 (x)$.



                Note: There are multiple ways of doing 4. If you are stuck, consider $ frac 2 - f(x) 2 - x $. This tells you how quickly you're moving away from 2 (and hence will be less than $sqrt3$ eventually.)






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$












                • $begingroup$
                  For part (1), if $x_n=-1$ then $x_n+1=2$ and $x_i=2$ for all $i>n+1$. We need also to show $x_n$ does not get the value $-1$.
                  $endgroup$
                  – S_Alex
                  6 hours ago













                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                You have essentially the right idea. Here are some hints to help you complete your proof.



                Let $f(x) = x^3 - 3x $.



                1. Show that $x_n in ( -2, 2 ). $


                2. Show that if $ x in (0, sqrt3)$, then $f(x) < 0 $.


                3. Show that if $x in ( sqrt3 , 2 )$, then $ 0 < f(x) < x$.

                  This tells us that the values will decrease. However, do they decrease enough?


                4. Show that if $ x in ( sqrt3 ,2 )$, then there eixsts an $n$ such that $ f^n(x) < sqrt3$.

                  This tells us that the values decrease enough to force a negative value, $f^n+1 (x)$.



                Note: There are multiple ways of doing 4. If you are stuck, consider $ frac 2 - f(x) 2 - x $. This tells you how quickly you're moving away from 2 (and hence will be less than $sqrt3$ eventually.)






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                You have essentially the right idea. Here are some hints to help you complete your proof.



                Let $f(x) = x^3 - 3x $.



                1. Show that $x_n in ( -2, 2 ). $


                2. Show that if $ x in (0, sqrt3)$, then $f(x) < 0 $.


                3. Show that if $x in ( sqrt3 , 2 )$, then $ 0 < f(x) < x$.

                  This tells us that the values will decrease. However, do they decrease enough?


                4. Show that if $ x in ( sqrt3 ,2 )$, then there eixsts an $n$ such that $ f^n(x) < sqrt3$.

                  This tells us that the values decrease enough to force a negative value, $f^n+1 (x)$.



                Note: There are multiple ways of doing 4. If you are stuck, consider $ frac 2 - f(x) 2 - x $. This tells you how quickly you're moving away from 2 (and hence will be less than $sqrt3$ eventually.)







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 6 hours ago

























                answered 6 hours ago









                Calvin LinCalvin Lin

                36.6k349116




                36.6k349116











                • $begingroup$
                  For part (1), if $x_n=-1$ then $x_n+1=2$ and $x_i=2$ for all $i>n+1$. We need also to show $x_n$ does not get the value $-1$.
                  $endgroup$
                  – S_Alex
                  6 hours ago
















                • $begingroup$
                  For part (1), if $x_n=-1$ then $x_n+1=2$ and $x_i=2$ for all $i>n+1$. We need also to show $x_n$ does not get the value $-1$.
                  $endgroup$
                  – S_Alex
                  6 hours ago















                $begingroup$
                For part (1), if $x_n=-1$ then $x_n+1=2$ and $x_i=2$ for all $i>n+1$. We need also to show $x_n$ does not get the value $-1$.
                $endgroup$
                – S_Alex
                6 hours ago




                $begingroup$
                For part (1), if $x_n=-1$ then $x_n+1=2$ and $x_i=2$ for all $i>n+1$. We need also to show $x_n$ does not get the value $-1$.
                $endgroup$
                – S_Alex
                6 hours ago











                2












                $begingroup$

                Let $f(x) = x^3 - 3x$ and explore, for which $x$ one has
                $$
                |f'(x)| < 1.
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  Let $f(x) = x^3 - 3x$ and explore, for which $x$ one has
                  $$
                  |f'(x)| < 1.
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    Let $f(x) = x^3 - 3x$ and explore, for which $x$ one has
                    $$
                    |f'(x)| < 1.
                    $$






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Let $f(x) = x^3 - 3x$ and explore, for which $x$ one has
                    $$
                    |f'(x)| < 1.
                    $$







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 7 hours ago









                    avsavs

                    4,4751515




                    4,4751515





















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Notice that for $alpha>0$:



                        $$(2+alpha)^3-3(2+alpha)=2+9alpha+6alpha^2+alpha^3>2+alpha$$
                        while for $betain[0,2]$:
                        $$(2-beta)^3-3(2-beta)=2-9beta+6beta^2-beta^3<2-beta$$



                        The opposite arguments can be made around $-2$. Since $x_1in[-2,-2]$, your iteration is restricted to this range






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          Notice that for $alpha>0$:



                          $$(2+alpha)^3-3(2+alpha)=2+9alpha+6alpha^2+alpha^3>2+alpha$$
                          while for $betain[0,2]$:
                          $$(2-beta)^3-3(2-beta)=2-9beta+6beta^2-beta^3<2-beta$$



                          The opposite arguments can be made around $-2$. Since $x_1in[-2,-2]$, your iteration is restricted to this range






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            Notice that for $alpha>0$:



                            $$(2+alpha)^3-3(2+alpha)=2+9alpha+6alpha^2+alpha^3>2+alpha$$
                            while for $betain[0,2]$:
                            $$(2-beta)^3-3(2-beta)=2-9beta+6beta^2-beta^3<2-beta$$



                            The opposite arguments can be made around $-2$. Since $x_1in[-2,-2]$, your iteration is restricted to this range






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Notice that for $alpha>0$:



                            $$(2+alpha)^3-3(2+alpha)=2+9alpha+6alpha^2+alpha^3>2+alpha$$
                            while for $betain[0,2]$:
                            $$(2-beta)^3-3(2-beta)=2-9beta+6beta^2-beta^3<2-beta$$



                            The opposite arguments can be made around $-2$. Since $x_1in[-2,-2]$, your iteration is restricted to this range







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 6 hours ago









                            Rhys HughesRhys Hughes

                            7,1381630




                            7,1381630





















                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                The desired claim follows from the following two observations:




                                Claim. If $x_n in -1/4, 1/4$, then $x_n neq 0$ for all $n geq 1$.




                                Proof. Let $p_1 = operatornamesign(x_1)$ and $p_n+1 = p_n^3 - 3p_n 4^2 cdot 3^n-1$. Then we inductively check that $p_n$ is always odd and $ x_n = p_n / 4^3^n-1$. Since the numerator is always odd integer, it cannot vanish, and the claim follows.




                                Claim 2. If either $x_n geq 0$ for any sufficiently large $n$ or $x_n leq 0$ for any sufficiently $n$, then we actually have $x_n = 0$ for any sufficiently large $n$.




                                Proof. Write $x_n = 2cos(2 pi f_n)$. Then



                                $$ cos(2 pi f_n+1) = fracx_n+12 = fracx_n^3 - 3x_n2 = 4cos^3(2 pi f_n) - 3cos(2 pi f_n) = cos(2 pi cdot 3f_n). $$



                                So it follows that $cos(2pi f_N+n) = cos(2pi cdot 3^n f_N)$. Now, replacing $(x_n)$ by $(-x_n)$ if necessary, we may assume that $x_n geq 0$ for all sufficiently large $n$. In other words, there exists $N$ so that $x_N+n geq 0$ for all $n geq 0$. Then each $3^n f_N$ must avoid the sets $(frac14, frac34) + mathbbZ$. So it follows that



                                $$ f_N in mathbbR setminus bigcup_n=0^infty bigcup_kinmathbbZ left( frac4k+14 cdot 3^n, frac4k+34 cdot 3^n right) = left k pm frac14cdot 3^n : n geq 0 right. $$



                                This implies that $3^n_0 f_N = pm 1$ for some $n_0 geq 0$, and hence $x_N+n = 0$ for all $n geq n_0$. This proves the desired claim.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$

















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  The desired claim follows from the following two observations:




                                  Claim. If $x_n in -1/4, 1/4$, then $x_n neq 0$ for all $n geq 1$.




                                  Proof. Let $p_1 = operatornamesign(x_1)$ and $p_n+1 = p_n^3 - 3p_n 4^2 cdot 3^n-1$. Then we inductively check that $p_n$ is always odd and $ x_n = p_n / 4^3^n-1$. Since the numerator is always odd integer, it cannot vanish, and the claim follows.




                                  Claim 2. If either $x_n geq 0$ for any sufficiently large $n$ or $x_n leq 0$ for any sufficiently $n$, then we actually have $x_n = 0$ for any sufficiently large $n$.




                                  Proof. Write $x_n = 2cos(2 pi f_n)$. Then



                                  $$ cos(2 pi f_n+1) = fracx_n+12 = fracx_n^3 - 3x_n2 = 4cos^3(2 pi f_n) - 3cos(2 pi f_n) = cos(2 pi cdot 3f_n). $$



                                  So it follows that $cos(2pi f_N+n) = cos(2pi cdot 3^n f_N)$. Now, replacing $(x_n)$ by $(-x_n)$ if necessary, we may assume that $x_n geq 0$ for all sufficiently large $n$. In other words, there exists $N$ so that $x_N+n geq 0$ for all $n geq 0$. Then each $3^n f_N$ must avoid the sets $(frac14, frac34) + mathbbZ$. So it follows that



                                  $$ f_N in mathbbR setminus bigcup_n=0^infty bigcup_kinmathbbZ left( frac4k+14 cdot 3^n, frac4k+34 cdot 3^n right) = left k pm frac14cdot 3^n : n geq 0 right. $$



                                  This implies that $3^n_0 f_N = pm 1$ for some $n_0 geq 0$, and hence $x_N+n = 0$ for all $n geq n_0$. This proves the desired claim.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$















                                    0












                                    0








                                    0





                                    $begingroup$

                                    The desired claim follows from the following two observations:




                                    Claim. If $x_n in -1/4, 1/4$, then $x_n neq 0$ for all $n geq 1$.




                                    Proof. Let $p_1 = operatornamesign(x_1)$ and $p_n+1 = p_n^3 - 3p_n 4^2 cdot 3^n-1$. Then we inductively check that $p_n$ is always odd and $ x_n = p_n / 4^3^n-1$. Since the numerator is always odd integer, it cannot vanish, and the claim follows.




                                    Claim 2. If either $x_n geq 0$ for any sufficiently large $n$ or $x_n leq 0$ for any sufficiently $n$, then we actually have $x_n = 0$ for any sufficiently large $n$.




                                    Proof. Write $x_n = 2cos(2 pi f_n)$. Then



                                    $$ cos(2 pi f_n+1) = fracx_n+12 = fracx_n^3 - 3x_n2 = 4cos^3(2 pi f_n) - 3cos(2 pi f_n) = cos(2 pi cdot 3f_n). $$



                                    So it follows that $cos(2pi f_N+n) = cos(2pi cdot 3^n f_N)$. Now, replacing $(x_n)$ by $(-x_n)$ if necessary, we may assume that $x_n geq 0$ for all sufficiently large $n$. In other words, there exists $N$ so that $x_N+n geq 0$ for all $n geq 0$. Then each $3^n f_N$ must avoid the sets $(frac14, frac34) + mathbbZ$. So it follows that



                                    $$ f_N in mathbbR setminus bigcup_n=0^infty bigcup_kinmathbbZ left( frac4k+14 cdot 3^n, frac4k+34 cdot 3^n right) = left k pm frac14cdot 3^n : n geq 0 right. $$



                                    This implies that $3^n_0 f_N = pm 1$ for some $n_0 geq 0$, and hence $x_N+n = 0$ for all $n geq n_0$. This proves the desired claim.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    The desired claim follows from the following two observations:




                                    Claim. If $x_n in -1/4, 1/4$, then $x_n neq 0$ for all $n geq 1$.




                                    Proof. Let $p_1 = operatornamesign(x_1)$ and $p_n+1 = p_n^3 - 3p_n 4^2 cdot 3^n-1$. Then we inductively check that $p_n$ is always odd and $ x_n = p_n / 4^3^n-1$. Since the numerator is always odd integer, it cannot vanish, and the claim follows.




                                    Claim 2. If either $x_n geq 0$ for any sufficiently large $n$ or $x_n leq 0$ for any sufficiently $n$, then we actually have $x_n = 0$ for any sufficiently large $n$.




                                    Proof. Write $x_n = 2cos(2 pi f_n)$. Then



                                    $$ cos(2 pi f_n+1) = fracx_n+12 = fracx_n^3 - 3x_n2 = 4cos^3(2 pi f_n) - 3cos(2 pi f_n) = cos(2 pi cdot 3f_n). $$



                                    So it follows that $cos(2pi f_N+n) = cos(2pi cdot 3^n f_N)$. Now, replacing $(x_n)$ by $(-x_n)$ if necessary, we may assume that $x_n geq 0$ for all sufficiently large $n$. In other words, there exists $N$ so that $x_N+n geq 0$ for all $n geq 0$. Then each $3^n f_N$ must avoid the sets $(frac14, frac34) + mathbbZ$. So it follows that



                                    $$ f_N in mathbbR setminus bigcup_n=0^infty bigcup_kinmathbbZ left( frac4k+14 cdot 3^n, frac4k+34 cdot 3^n right) = left k pm frac14cdot 3^n : n geq 0 right. $$



                                    This implies that $3^n_0 f_N = pm 1$ for some $n_0 geq 0$, and hence $x_N+n = 0$ for all $n geq n_0$. This proves the desired claim.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered 3 hours ago









                                    Sangchul LeeSangchul Lee

                                    97k12173283




                                    97k12173283



























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded
















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3203826%2finfinitely-many-negative-and-infinitely-many-positive-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Dapidodigma demeter Subspecies | Notae | Tabula navigationisDapidodigmaAfrotropical Butterflies: Lycaenidae - Subtribe IolainaAmplifica

                                        Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

                                        Gaius Norbanus Flaccus (consul 38 a.C.n.) Index De gente | De cursu honorum | Notae | Fontes | Si vis plura legere | Tabula navigationisHic legere potes