What does it mean to express a gate in Dirac notation?How does bra-ket notation work?How does Fourier sampling actually work (and solve the parity problem)?What do we mean by the notation $lvert mathbfx, 0rangle$?What does the notation $lvert underlinex rangle$ mean?How to properly write the action of a quantum gate implementing an operator $U$ on the superposition of its eigenvectors?Notation for two entangled registersWhy is correlation in the $X$ basis represented as $Xotimes X = 1$?N&C quantum circuit for Grover's algorithmNotation for two qubit composite product stateWhat is the tensorial representation of the quantum swap gate?
How to write a column outside the braces in a matrix?
Will tsunami waves travel forever if there was no land?
a sore throat vs a strep throat vs strep throat
Phrase for the opposite of "foolproof"
Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?
Why isn't the definition of absolute value applied when squaring a radical containing a variable?
What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?
Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?
Does Gita support doctrine of eternal cycle of birth and death for evil people?
How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?
Realistic Necromancy?
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
Fizzy, soft, pop and still drinks
The Defining Moment
How to get a plain text file version of a CP/M .BAS (M-BASIC) program?
What does the "ep" capability mean?
Mjolnir's timeline from Thor's perspective
How to solve constants out of the internal energy equation?
How to make a pipeline wait for end-of-file or stop after an error?
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
In order to check if a field is required or not, is the result of isNillable method sufficient?
To say I met a person for the first time
Examples of subgroups where it's nontrivial to show closure under multiplication?
Seemingly unused edef prior to an ifx mysteriously affects the outcome of the ifx. Why?
What does it mean to express a gate in Dirac notation?
How does bra-ket notation work?How does Fourier sampling actually work (and solve the parity problem)?What do we mean by the notation $lvert mathbfx, 0rangle$?What does the notation $lvert underlinex rangle$ mean?How to properly write the action of a quantum gate implementing an operator $U$ on the superposition of its eigenvectors?Notation for two entangled registersWhy is correlation in the $X$ basis represented as $Xotimes X = 1$?N&C quantum circuit for Grover's algorithmNotation for two qubit composite product stateWhat is the tensorial representation of the quantum swap gate?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
When discussing the Dirac notation of an operator, for example, let's just say we have the bit flip gate $X$ if we want to write this in the Dirac notation does that just mean writing it as follows?
$$X|psirangle=X(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)=c_0|1rangle+c_1|0rangle$$
quantum-gate notation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When discussing the Dirac notation of an operator, for example, let's just say we have the bit flip gate $X$ if we want to write this in the Dirac notation does that just mean writing it as follows?
$$X|psirangle=X(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)=c_0|1rangle+c_1|0rangle$$
quantum-gate notation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When discussing the Dirac notation of an operator, for example, let's just say we have the bit flip gate $X$ if we want to write this in the Dirac notation does that just mean writing it as follows?
$$X|psirangle=X(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)=c_0|1rangle+c_1|0rangle$$
quantum-gate notation
$endgroup$
When discussing the Dirac notation of an operator, for example, let's just say we have the bit flip gate $X$ if we want to write this in the Dirac notation does that just mean writing it as follows?
$$X|psirangle=X(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)=c_0|1rangle+c_1|0rangle$$
quantum-gate notation
quantum-gate notation
edited 2 hours ago
Sanchayan Dutta♦
6,72341556
6,72341556
asked 2 hours ago
can'tcauchycan'tcauchy
1945
1945
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This might mean using the ketbra notation:
$$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.
A couple of other examples:
$$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$
$$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
40 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:
$$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$
Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:
In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.
The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,frac0rangle+sqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:
$$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac-langle 0sqrt2) + 1(frac0rangle+sqrt2)(fracsqrt2)$$
$$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
$$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:
$$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
$$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
$$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$
So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.
We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "694"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5989%2fwhat-does-it-mean-to-express-a-gate-in-dirac-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This might mean using the ketbra notation:
$$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.
A couple of other examples:
$$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$
$$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
40 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This might mean using the ketbra notation:
$$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.
A couple of other examples:
$$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$
$$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
40 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This might mean using the ketbra notation:
$$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.
A couple of other examples:
$$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$
$$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$
$endgroup$
This might mean using the ketbra notation:
$$X = |1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
This notation describes the effect the operator has on the basis vectors: in this case $X$ converts $|0rangle$ into $|1rangle$ and vice versa.
A couple of other examples:
$$Z = |0rangle langle0| - |1rangle langle1|$$
$$operatornameCNOT = |0 ranglelangle0| otimes I + |1 ranglelangle 1| otimes X = |00rangle langle00| + |01rangle langle01| + |11rangle langle10| + |10rangle langle11|$$
edited 55 mins ago
Sanchayan Dutta♦
6,72341556
6,72341556
answered 1 hour ago
Mariia MykhailovaMariia Mykhailova
1,9401212
1,9401212
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
40 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
For OP: a quick and intuitive way to derive the CNOT's outer product representation is to see what effect it has on the individual qubits. The CNOT flips the second qubit when the control qubit is $|1rangle$. When the control qubit is $|0rangle$ the second qubit remains intact, which is equivalent to applying the identity gate $I$. So we get $|0ranglelangle 0|otimes I$ for this. However, when the control qubit is $|1rangle$ we need to flip the second qubit's state i.e. we need to apply the $X$ gate to the second qubit. Thus, we get $|1ranglelangle 1|otimes X$ for this.
$endgroup$
– Sanchayan Dutta♦
40 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:
$$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$
Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:
In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.
The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,frac0rangle+sqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:
$$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac-langle 0sqrt2) + 1(frac0rangle+sqrt2)(fracsqrt2)$$
$$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
$$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:
$$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
$$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
$$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$
So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.
We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:
$$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$
Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:
In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.
The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,frac0rangle+sqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:
$$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac-langle 0sqrt2) + 1(frac0rangle+sqrt2)(fracsqrt2)$$
$$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
$$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:
$$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
$$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
$$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$
So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.
We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:
$$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$
Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:
In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.
The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,frac0rangle+sqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:
$$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac-langle 0sqrt2) + 1(frac0rangle+sqrt2)(fracsqrt2)$$
$$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
$$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:
$$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
$$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
$$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$
So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.
We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!
$endgroup$
The Dirac notation for the Pauli-$X$ gate is:
$$|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|.$$
Now you might be wondering where this comes from. The term you're looking for is outer product representation of the $X$ gate. It follows from the spectral decomposition theorem (check Nielsen & Chuang 10th edition, p. 72) which holds for all normal operators. The key point:
In terms of the outer product representation, this means that $M$ can be written as $M=sum_ilambda_i|iranglelangle i|$,where $lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues of $M$,$|irangle$ is an orthonormal basis for $V$, and each $|irangle$ an eigenvector of $M$ with eigenvalue $lambda_i$.
The eigenvectors of the Pauli-$X$ gate are $-|0rangle+|1rangle$ and $|0rangle+|1rangle$, and the corresponding eigenvalues are $-1$ and $+1$ cf. Wolfram Alpha. Normalize the eigenvectors to get an orthonormal basis for $X$ i.e. $frac-sqrt2,frac0rangle+sqrt2$. According the spectral decomposition theorem you can represent the $X$ gate as:
$$-1(frac-sqrt2)(frac-langle 0sqrt2) + 1(frac0rangle+sqrt2)(fracsqrt2)$$
$$=-frac12(|0ranglelangle0|-|0ranglelangle1|-|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)+frac12(|0ranglelangle0|+|0ranglelangle1|+|1ranglelangle0|+|1ranglelangle1|)$$
$$=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$$
To convince you that this result is correct let's apply it on an arbitrary qubit state $c_0|0rangle+c_1 |1rangle$:
$$(|1rangle langle0| + |0rangle langle1|)(c_0|0rangle+c_1|1rangle)$$
$$=c_0|1ranglelangle0|0rangle+c_1|0ranglelangle 1|1rangle$$
$$=c_0 |1rangle + c_1 |0rangle$$
So yes, our result is correct and the bits were indeed flipped upon application of $X=|1rangle langle0| + |1rangle langle0|$ to $c_0|0rangle + c_1|1rangle$.The last step followed from the fact that $langle 0|0rangle$ and $langle 1|1rangle$ are both equal to $1$, as $|0rangle$ and $|1rangle$ are orthonormal vectors i.e. their inner product $langle psi|psirangle=1$ by definition.
We're done. As an exercise, find the outer product representation of the Pauli-$Z$ gate by yourself. And definitely, do go through the proof of the spectral theorem in Nielsen and Chung if time permits!
edited 51 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
Sanchayan Dutta♦Sanchayan Dutta
6,72341556
6,72341556
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f5989%2fwhat-does-it-mean-to-express-a-gate-in-dirac-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown