Why is the change of basis formula counter-intuitive? [See details] Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Change of basisChange of basis = similarity?Change of Basis vs. Linear TransformationMatrices for change of basis linear transformationsConfusion about change of basis matrixIntuitive understanding of the $BAB^-1$ formula for changing basis in linear transformations.Standard Basis and Change of Basis MatrixStandard matrix linear transformation - change of basisHard change of basis/ linear transformation problemChange of basis difference between linear and bilinear transformation

What does it mean that physics no longer uses mechanical models to describe phenomena?

Delete free apps from library

Sally's older brother

Does silver oxide react with hydrogen sulfide?

Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?

How can a team of shapeshifters communicate?

Special flights

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

Google .dev domain strangely redirects to https

A proverb that is used to imply that you have unexpectedly faced a big problem

How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?

Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?

Moving a wrapfig vertically to encroach partially on a subsection title

A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way

In musical terms, what properties are varied by the human voice to produce different words / syllables?

Trying to understand entropy as a novice in thermodynamics

Tannaka duality for semisimple groups

Is it dangerous to install hacking tools on my private linux machine?

Why is std::move not [[nodiscard]] in C++20?

Why is it faster to reheat something than it is to cook it?

Universal covering space of the real projective line?

Was Kant an Intuitionist about mathematical objects?

Resize vertical bars (absolute-value symbols)

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?



Why is the change of basis formula counter-intuitive? [See details]



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Change of basisChange of basis = similarity?Change of Basis vs. Linear TransformationMatrices for change of basis linear transformationsConfusion about change of basis matrixIntuitive understanding of the $BAB^-1$ formula for changing basis in linear transformations.Standard Basis and Change of Basis MatrixStandard matrix linear transformation - change of basisHard change of basis/ linear transformation problemChange of basis difference between linear and bilinear transformation










1












$begingroup$


The formula of change of basis $[T]_B' = P_B' <-B[T]_BP_B <- B'$.



I don't understand why you need $P_B <- B'$? It seems to me that if you have the transformation expressed in B already with $[T]_B$ you just need to translate to B' by using $P_B' <-B$ to get $[T]_B'$ rendering $P_B <- B'$ as useless. Can someone explain what I am missing here?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    @littleO this is actually what I was looking for. Can you write it as real answer instead of a comment it might help others understand as well so I can approve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr.Stone
    4 hours ago
















1












$begingroup$


The formula of change of basis $[T]_B' = P_B' <-B[T]_BP_B <- B'$.



I don't understand why you need $P_B <- B'$? It seems to me that if you have the transformation expressed in B already with $[T]_B$ you just need to translate to B' by using $P_B' <-B$ to get $[T]_B'$ rendering $P_B <- B'$ as useless. Can someone explain what I am missing here?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    @littleO this is actually what I was looking for. Can you write it as real answer instead of a comment it might help others understand as well so I can approve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr.Stone
    4 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


The formula of change of basis $[T]_B' = P_B' <-B[T]_BP_B <- B'$.



I don't understand why you need $P_B <- B'$? It seems to me that if you have the transformation expressed in B already with $[T]_B$ you just need to translate to B' by using $P_B' <-B$ to get $[T]_B'$ rendering $P_B <- B'$ as useless. Can someone explain what I am missing here?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




The formula of change of basis $[T]_B' = P_B' <-B[T]_BP_B <- B'$.



I don't understand why you need $P_B <- B'$? It seems to me that if you have the transformation expressed in B already with $[T]_B$ you just need to translate to B' by using $P_B' <-B$ to get $[T]_B'$ rendering $P_B <- B'$ as useless. Can someone explain what I am missing here?







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









Dr.StoneDr.Stone

626




626











  • $begingroup$
    @littleO this is actually what I was looking for. Can you write it as real answer instead of a comment it might help others understand as well so I can approve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr.Stone
    4 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    @littleO this is actually what I was looking for. Can you write it as real answer instead of a comment it might help others understand as well so I can approve it.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr.Stone
    4 hours ago
















$begingroup$
@littleO this is actually what I was looking for. Can you write it as real answer instead of a comment it might help others understand as well so I can approve it.
$endgroup$
– Dr.Stone
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
@littleO this is actually what I was looking for. Can you write it as real answer instead of a comment it might help others understand as well so I can approve it.
$endgroup$
– Dr.Stone
4 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Imagine what you must do to a vector expressed in $B'$ coordinates in order to apply $T$ to it. First you switch from $B'$ coordinates to $B$ coordinates, then you multiply by the matrix of $T$ (with respect to $B$), then finally you switch back to $B'$ coordinates.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    Write $B=e_1,...,e_n, B' =e_1',...,e_n'$



    If you have the first member of $B'$, $e_1'$, and you want to compute the effect of $T$ on it, then applying $[T]_B$ to $(1,0,...0)$ will be the effect of $T$ on the first member of the basis $B$, so $e_1$, written in the basis $B$ so it has nothing to do with the image of $e_1'$.



    So if you only know $[T]_B$ and want to compute $Te_1'$, then you first have to write $e_1'$ in the basis $B$, so you compute $P_B'to B(1,0,...0)$, then compute $[T]_B$ times that, which yields $Te_1'$ but written in the basis $B$, so now you have to write it in the basis $B'$ to get the correct result, that's where $P_Bto B'$ comes from on the left. This gives the formula






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3195162%2fwhy-is-the-change-of-basis-formula-counter-intuitive-see-details%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      Imagine what you must do to a vector expressed in $B'$ coordinates in order to apply $T$ to it. First you switch from $B'$ coordinates to $B$ coordinates, then you multiply by the matrix of $T$ (with respect to $B$), then finally you switch back to $B'$ coordinates.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        2












        $begingroup$

        Imagine what you must do to a vector expressed in $B'$ coordinates in order to apply $T$ to it. First you switch from $B'$ coordinates to $B$ coordinates, then you multiply by the matrix of $T$ (with respect to $B$), then finally you switch back to $B'$ coordinates.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Imagine what you must do to a vector expressed in $B'$ coordinates in order to apply $T$ to it. First you switch from $B'$ coordinates to $B$ coordinates, then you multiply by the matrix of $T$ (with respect to $B$), then finally you switch back to $B'$ coordinates.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Imagine what you must do to a vector expressed in $B'$ coordinates in order to apply $T$ to it. First you switch from $B'$ coordinates to $B$ coordinates, then you multiply by the matrix of $T$ (with respect to $B$), then finally you switch back to $B'$ coordinates.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          littleOlittleO

          30.6k649111




          30.6k649111





















              1












              $begingroup$

              Write $B=e_1,...,e_n, B' =e_1',...,e_n'$



              If you have the first member of $B'$, $e_1'$, and you want to compute the effect of $T$ on it, then applying $[T]_B$ to $(1,0,...0)$ will be the effect of $T$ on the first member of the basis $B$, so $e_1$, written in the basis $B$ so it has nothing to do with the image of $e_1'$.



              So if you only know $[T]_B$ and want to compute $Te_1'$, then you first have to write $e_1'$ in the basis $B$, so you compute $P_B'to B(1,0,...0)$, then compute $[T]_B$ times that, which yields $Te_1'$ but written in the basis $B$, so now you have to write it in the basis $B'$ to get the correct result, that's where $P_Bto B'$ comes from on the left. This gives the formula






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                Write $B=e_1,...,e_n, B' =e_1',...,e_n'$



                If you have the first member of $B'$, $e_1'$, and you want to compute the effect of $T$ on it, then applying $[T]_B$ to $(1,0,...0)$ will be the effect of $T$ on the first member of the basis $B$, so $e_1$, written in the basis $B$ so it has nothing to do with the image of $e_1'$.



                So if you only know $[T]_B$ and want to compute $Te_1'$, then you first have to write $e_1'$ in the basis $B$, so you compute $P_B'to B(1,0,...0)$, then compute $[T]_B$ times that, which yields $Te_1'$ but written in the basis $B$, so now you have to write it in the basis $B'$ to get the correct result, that's where $P_Bto B'$ comes from on the left. This gives the formula






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Write $B=e_1,...,e_n, B' =e_1',...,e_n'$



                  If you have the first member of $B'$, $e_1'$, and you want to compute the effect of $T$ on it, then applying $[T]_B$ to $(1,0,...0)$ will be the effect of $T$ on the first member of the basis $B$, so $e_1$, written in the basis $B$ so it has nothing to do with the image of $e_1'$.



                  So if you only know $[T]_B$ and want to compute $Te_1'$, then you first have to write $e_1'$ in the basis $B$, so you compute $P_B'to B(1,0,...0)$, then compute $[T]_B$ times that, which yields $Te_1'$ but written in the basis $B$, so now you have to write it in the basis $B'$ to get the correct result, that's where $P_Bto B'$ comes from on the left. This gives the formula






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Write $B=e_1,...,e_n, B' =e_1',...,e_n'$



                  If you have the first member of $B'$, $e_1'$, and you want to compute the effect of $T$ on it, then applying $[T]_B$ to $(1,0,...0)$ will be the effect of $T$ on the first member of the basis $B$, so $e_1$, written in the basis $B$ so it has nothing to do with the image of $e_1'$.



                  So if you only know $[T]_B$ and want to compute $Te_1'$, then you first have to write $e_1'$ in the basis $B$, so you compute $P_B'to B(1,0,...0)$, then compute $[T]_B$ times that, which yields $Te_1'$ but written in the basis $B$, so now you have to write it in the basis $B'$ to get the correct result, that's where $P_Bto B'$ comes from on the left. This gives the formula







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 4 hours ago









                  MaxMax

                  16.6k11144




                  16.6k11144



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3195162%2fwhy-is-the-change-of-basis-formula-counter-intuitive-see-details%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Dapidodigma demeter Subspecies | Notae | Tabula navigationisDapidodigmaAfrotropical Butterflies: Lycaenidae - Subtribe IolainaAmplifica

                      Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

                      Gaius Norbanus Flaccus (consul 38 a.C.n.) Index De gente | De cursu honorum | Notae | Fontes | Si vis plura legere | Tabula navigationisHic legere potes