Construct a nonabelian group of order 44 Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)The dihedral group $Vlanglealpharangle$Number of Sylow bases of a certain group of order 60Nonabelian group of order $p^3$ for odd prime $p$ and exponent $p$The only group of order $255$ is $mathbb Z_255$ ( Using Sylow and the $N/C$ Theorem)Number of elements of order $11$ in group of order $1331$Classifying groups of order $20$Construct a non-abelian group of order 75order of automorphism group of an abelian group of order 75Understanding a group of order $2^25.97^2$Understanding semidirect product for group of order 30
Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions
A German immigrant ancestor has a "Registration Affidavit of Alien Enemy" on file. What does that mean exactly?
Why doesn't the university give past final exams' answers?
Is Vivien of the Wilds + Wilderness Reclamation a competitive combo?
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
Why aren't road bike wheels tiny?
Can the van der Waals coefficients be negative in the van der Waals equation for real gases?
Construct a nonabelian group of order 44
Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?
How can I introduce the names of fantasy creatures to the reader?
A journey... into the MIND
Are Flameskulls resistant to magical piercing damage?
How to break 信じようとしていただけかも知れない into separate parts?
How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?
How to produce a PS1 prompt in bash or ksh93 similar to tcsh
Who's this lady in the war room?
Will I be more secure with my own router behind my ISP's router?
Who can become a wight?
Should man-made satellites feature an intelligent inverted "cow catcher"?
Why is one lightbulb in a string illuminated?
lm and glm function in R
What were wait-states, and why was it only an issue for PCs?
tabularx column has extra padding at right?
Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?
Construct a nonabelian group of order 44
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)The dihedral group $Vlanglealpharangle$Number of Sylow bases of a certain group of order 60Nonabelian group of order $p^3$ for odd prime $p$ and exponent $p$The only group of order $255$ is $mathbb Z_255$ ( Using Sylow and the $N/C$ Theorem)Number of elements of order $11$ in group of order $1331$Classifying groups of order $20$Construct a non-abelian group of order 75order of automorphism group of an abelian group of order 75Understanding a group of order $2^25.97^2$Understanding semidirect product for group of order 30
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group s.t. $|G|=44=2^211$. Using Sylow's Theorems, I have deduced that there is a unique Sylow $11$-subgroup of $G$; we shall call it $R$. Let $P$ be a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $G$. Then we have $G=Prtimes R$ and a homomorphism
$$gamma: P rightarrow Aut(R)=Aut(mathbbZ_11)cong(mathbbZ_10,+) .$$
Is this all correct so far?
So what about $gamma(p)=phi_p$ where $phi_p(r)=r^5$. I thought this because $tilde5inmathbbZ_10$ has order $4$ so the order of any element of $P$ could divide it... or something...
So I was thinking the group would be something like
$$G= langle p,r | p^4=r^11 prp^-1=r^5 rangle .$$
Any insight is greatly appreciated! Thanks! I would like to know both where I went wrong and how to do it correctly.
Did I do the above right? Identifying $mathbbZ_11$ with the additive group of $mathbbZ_10$? Or should I look at it multiplicatively, because I don't understand how that isomorphism works so it doesn't make sense to define the conjugation that makes the semi-direct product well defined based on elements of the additive group $mathbbZ_10$, but instead realize that $10 in U(mathbbZ_11)$ has order $2$ so we can have a group presentation something like:
$G = langle p, r | p^2=r^11=1 , prp^-1=r^10 rangle$
Insight appreciated!
I understand the dihedral group of the $22$-gon works now, thank you. Can somebody help me with my approach in constructing a non-abelian group of order $44$ via the methods I've been using? Thanks!
abstract-algebra group-theory sylow-theory group-presentation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group s.t. $|G|=44=2^211$. Using Sylow's Theorems, I have deduced that there is a unique Sylow $11$-subgroup of $G$; we shall call it $R$. Let $P$ be a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $G$. Then we have $G=Prtimes R$ and a homomorphism
$$gamma: P rightarrow Aut(R)=Aut(mathbbZ_11)cong(mathbbZ_10,+) .$$
Is this all correct so far?
So what about $gamma(p)=phi_p$ where $phi_p(r)=r^5$. I thought this because $tilde5inmathbbZ_10$ has order $4$ so the order of any element of $P$ could divide it... or something...
So I was thinking the group would be something like
$$G= langle p,r | p^4=r^11 prp^-1=r^5 rangle .$$
Any insight is greatly appreciated! Thanks! I would like to know both where I went wrong and how to do it correctly.
Did I do the above right? Identifying $mathbbZ_11$ with the additive group of $mathbbZ_10$? Or should I look at it multiplicatively, because I don't understand how that isomorphism works so it doesn't make sense to define the conjugation that makes the semi-direct product well defined based on elements of the additive group $mathbbZ_10$, but instead realize that $10 in U(mathbbZ_11)$ has order $2$ so we can have a group presentation something like:
$G = langle p, r | p^2=r^11=1 , prp^-1=r^10 rangle$
Insight appreciated!
I understand the dihedral group of the $22$-gon works now, thank you. Can somebody help me with my approach in constructing a non-abelian group of order $44$ via the methods I've been using? Thanks!
abstract-algebra group-theory sylow-theory group-presentation
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think you meant $r^11$ (r^11), not $r^11$ (r^11)
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've taken the liberty of apply the correction J.W. Tanner mentioned, as well as a few other minor fixes.
$endgroup$
– Travis
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don’t understand the words, “because $tilde5inBbb Z_10$ has order $4$”
$endgroup$
– Lubin
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't $tilde5 in mathbbZ_10$ have order $2$?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And if you have a non-abelian group of order 22, isn't it easy to find one of order 44?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a group s.t. $|G|=44=2^211$. Using Sylow's Theorems, I have deduced that there is a unique Sylow $11$-subgroup of $G$; we shall call it $R$. Let $P$ be a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $G$. Then we have $G=Prtimes R$ and a homomorphism
$$gamma: P rightarrow Aut(R)=Aut(mathbbZ_11)cong(mathbbZ_10,+) .$$
Is this all correct so far?
So what about $gamma(p)=phi_p$ where $phi_p(r)=r^5$. I thought this because $tilde5inmathbbZ_10$ has order $4$ so the order of any element of $P$ could divide it... or something...
So I was thinking the group would be something like
$$G= langle p,r | p^4=r^11 prp^-1=r^5 rangle .$$
Any insight is greatly appreciated! Thanks! I would like to know both where I went wrong and how to do it correctly.
Did I do the above right? Identifying $mathbbZ_11$ with the additive group of $mathbbZ_10$? Or should I look at it multiplicatively, because I don't understand how that isomorphism works so it doesn't make sense to define the conjugation that makes the semi-direct product well defined based on elements of the additive group $mathbbZ_10$, but instead realize that $10 in U(mathbbZ_11)$ has order $2$ so we can have a group presentation something like:
$G = langle p, r | p^2=r^11=1 , prp^-1=r^10 rangle$
Insight appreciated!
I understand the dihedral group of the $22$-gon works now, thank you. Can somebody help me with my approach in constructing a non-abelian group of order $44$ via the methods I've been using? Thanks!
abstract-algebra group-theory sylow-theory group-presentation
$endgroup$
Let $G$ be a group s.t. $|G|=44=2^211$. Using Sylow's Theorems, I have deduced that there is a unique Sylow $11$-subgroup of $G$; we shall call it $R$. Let $P$ be a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $G$. Then we have $G=Prtimes R$ and a homomorphism
$$gamma: P rightarrow Aut(R)=Aut(mathbbZ_11)cong(mathbbZ_10,+) .$$
Is this all correct so far?
So what about $gamma(p)=phi_p$ where $phi_p(r)=r^5$. I thought this because $tilde5inmathbbZ_10$ has order $4$ so the order of any element of $P$ could divide it... or something...
So I was thinking the group would be something like
$$G= langle p,r | p^4=r^11 prp^-1=r^5 rangle .$$
Any insight is greatly appreciated! Thanks! I would like to know both where I went wrong and how to do it correctly.
Did I do the above right? Identifying $mathbbZ_11$ with the additive group of $mathbbZ_10$? Or should I look at it multiplicatively, because I don't understand how that isomorphism works so it doesn't make sense to define the conjugation that makes the semi-direct product well defined based on elements of the additive group $mathbbZ_10$, but instead realize that $10 in U(mathbbZ_11)$ has order $2$ so we can have a group presentation something like:
$G = langle p, r | p^2=r^11=1 , prp^-1=r^10 rangle$
Insight appreciated!
I understand the dihedral group of the $22$-gon works now, thank you. Can somebody help me with my approach in constructing a non-abelian group of order $44$ via the methods I've been using? Thanks!
abstract-algebra group-theory sylow-theory group-presentation
abstract-algebra group-theory sylow-theory group-presentation
edited 3 hours ago
Travis
64.6k769152
64.6k769152
asked 5 hours ago
Mathematical MushroomMathematical Mushroom
22418
22418
$begingroup$
I think you meant $r^11$ (r^11), not $r^11$ (r^11)
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've taken the liberty of apply the correction J.W. Tanner mentioned, as well as a few other minor fixes.
$endgroup$
– Travis
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don’t understand the words, “because $tilde5inBbb Z_10$ has order $4$”
$endgroup$
– Lubin
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't $tilde5 in mathbbZ_10$ have order $2$?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And if you have a non-abelian group of order 22, isn't it easy to find one of order 44?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you meant $r^11$ (r^11), not $r^11$ (r^11)
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've taken the liberty of apply the correction J.W. Tanner mentioned, as well as a few other minor fixes.
$endgroup$
– Travis
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don’t understand the words, “because $tilde5inBbb Z_10$ has order $4$”
$endgroup$
– Lubin
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't $tilde5 in mathbbZ_10$ have order $2$?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And if you have a non-abelian group of order 22, isn't it easy to find one of order 44?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think you meant $r^11$ (r^11), not $r^11$ (r^11)
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I think you meant $r^11$ (r^11), not $r^11$ (r^11)
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've taken the liberty of apply the correction J.W. Tanner mentioned, as well as a few other minor fixes.
$endgroup$
– Travis
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've taken the liberty of apply the correction J.W. Tanner mentioned, as well as a few other minor fixes.
$endgroup$
– Travis
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don’t understand the words, “because $tilde5inBbb Z_10$ has order $4$”
$endgroup$
– Lubin
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don’t understand the words, “because $tilde5inBbb Z_10$ has order $4$”
$endgroup$
– Lubin
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't $tilde5 in mathbbZ_10$ have order $2$?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't $tilde5 in mathbbZ_10$ have order $2$?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And if you have a non-abelian group of order 22, isn't it easy to find one of order 44?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And if you have a non-abelian group of order 22, isn't it easy to find one of order 44?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No element of $mathbb Z_10$ has order four (why not?) and there is one element of order 2 ($5inmathbb Z_10$ under addition, $10cong -1in mathbb Z_11^x$ under multiplication.), so our possibilities are quite limited. There are two groups of order $4$, and either will work as our $R$. To give a nonabelian group, we need to pick a nontrivial homomorphism, as you pointed out.
So at least one generator of $R$ has to map to our order-two element. In the case of the Klein four group, there appear to be three possibilities, but I claim that up to an isomorphism of the Klein four group, there is only one possibility.
Actually, this exhausts the possibilities for groups of order 44: we have two abelian groups, $mathbb Z_11timesmathbbZ_4$, $mathbb Z_11times mathbbZ_2times mathbb Z_2$, and two nonabelian groups: $mathbbZ_11 rtimes mathbb Z_4 = langle a,b mid a^11, b^4, b^-1ab = a^-1rangle$ and $mathbb Z_11rtimes(mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2) = langle a, b, c mid a^11, b^2, c^2, [b,c], b^-1ab = c^-1ac = a^-1 rangle$. I think the latter is $D_22$ (for 22-gon, not order of group), while the former has an element of order $4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're on the right track (but NB your semidirect product is written in the wrong order). To analyze the possible maps $gamma : P to operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11) cong (Bbb Z_10, +)$, we consider separately the cases $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and $P cong Bbb Z_4$.
In the case $P cong Bbb Z_4$, $P$ is generated by a single element, $[1]$, of order $4$, and so $$operatornameid_Bbb Z_11 = gamma([0]) = gamma([1] + [1] + [1] + [1]) = gamma([1])^4 .$$ So, $gamma([1])$ has order dividing $4$, and the only such elements of $operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11) cong (Bbb Z_10, +)$ are $operatornameid_Bbb Z_11 leftrightarrow [0]$ and $(x mapsto -x) leftrightarrow [5]$.
If $gamma([1]) = operatornameid_Bbb Z_11$, then $gamma$ is the trivial homomorphism $Bbb Z_4 to operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11)$. This gives the direct product $G cong Bbb Z_11 times Bbb Z_4 cong Bbb Z_44 .$
If $gamma([1]) = (x mapsto -x)$, then $gamma([b])([c]) = (-1)^b [c]$, and the semidirect product $G = Bbb Z_11 rtimes_gamma Bbb Z_4$ is defined by
$$([a], [b]) cdot ([c], [d]) = ([a] + (-1)^b [c], [b] + [d]) .$$ It's apparent from the multiplication rule that this group is nonabelian. The fact that the group is generated by $u := ([1], [0])$ and $v := ([0], [1])$ can be used to construct an explicit presentation of this group and to show that $G$ is the dicyclic group of order $44$.
One can analyze the case $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ similarly, and this case gives rise to two more groups up to isomorphism, namely the abelian group $Bbb Z_11 times Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and the (nonabelian) dihedral group $D_44 cong D_22 times Bbb Z_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3197658%2fconstruct-a-nonabelian-group-of-order-44%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No element of $mathbb Z_10$ has order four (why not?) and there is one element of order 2 ($5inmathbb Z_10$ under addition, $10cong -1in mathbb Z_11^x$ under multiplication.), so our possibilities are quite limited. There are two groups of order $4$, and either will work as our $R$. To give a nonabelian group, we need to pick a nontrivial homomorphism, as you pointed out.
So at least one generator of $R$ has to map to our order-two element. In the case of the Klein four group, there appear to be three possibilities, but I claim that up to an isomorphism of the Klein four group, there is only one possibility.
Actually, this exhausts the possibilities for groups of order 44: we have two abelian groups, $mathbb Z_11timesmathbbZ_4$, $mathbb Z_11times mathbbZ_2times mathbb Z_2$, and two nonabelian groups: $mathbbZ_11 rtimes mathbb Z_4 = langle a,b mid a^11, b^4, b^-1ab = a^-1rangle$ and $mathbb Z_11rtimes(mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2) = langle a, b, c mid a^11, b^2, c^2, [b,c], b^-1ab = c^-1ac = a^-1 rangle$. I think the latter is $D_22$ (for 22-gon, not order of group), while the former has an element of order $4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No element of $mathbb Z_10$ has order four (why not?) and there is one element of order 2 ($5inmathbb Z_10$ under addition, $10cong -1in mathbb Z_11^x$ under multiplication.), so our possibilities are quite limited. There are two groups of order $4$, and either will work as our $R$. To give a nonabelian group, we need to pick a nontrivial homomorphism, as you pointed out.
So at least one generator of $R$ has to map to our order-two element. In the case of the Klein four group, there appear to be three possibilities, but I claim that up to an isomorphism of the Klein four group, there is only one possibility.
Actually, this exhausts the possibilities for groups of order 44: we have two abelian groups, $mathbb Z_11timesmathbbZ_4$, $mathbb Z_11times mathbbZ_2times mathbb Z_2$, and two nonabelian groups: $mathbbZ_11 rtimes mathbb Z_4 = langle a,b mid a^11, b^4, b^-1ab = a^-1rangle$ and $mathbb Z_11rtimes(mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2) = langle a, b, c mid a^11, b^2, c^2, [b,c], b^-1ab = c^-1ac = a^-1 rangle$. I think the latter is $D_22$ (for 22-gon, not order of group), while the former has an element of order $4$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No element of $mathbb Z_10$ has order four (why not?) and there is one element of order 2 ($5inmathbb Z_10$ under addition, $10cong -1in mathbb Z_11^x$ under multiplication.), so our possibilities are quite limited. There are two groups of order $4$, and either will work as our $R$. To give a nonabelian group, we need to pick a nontrivial homomorphism, as you pointed out.
So at least one generator of $R$ has to map to our order-two element. In the case of the Klein four group, there appear to be three possibilities, but I claim that up to an isomorphism of the Klein four group, there is only one possibility.
Actually, this exhausts the possibilities for groups of order 44: we have two abelian groups, $mathbb Z_11timesmathbbZ_4$, $mathbb Z_11times mathbbZ_2times mathbb Z_2$, and two nonabelian groups: $mathbbZ_11 rtimes mathbb Z_4 = langle a,b mid a^11, b^4, b^-1ab = a^-1rangle$ and $mathbb Z_11rtimes(mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2) = langle a, b, c mid a^11, b^2, c^2, [b,c], b^-1ab = c^-1ac = a^-1 rangle$. I think the latter is $D_22$ (for 22-gon, not order of group), while the former has an element of order $4$.
$endgroup$
No element of $mathbb Z_10$ has order four (why not?) and there is one element of order 2 ($5inmathbb Z_10$ under addition, $10cong -1in mathbb Z_11^x$ under multiplication.), so our possibilities are quite limited. There are two groups of order $4$, and either will work as our $R$. To give a nonabelian group, we need to pick a nontrivial homomorphism, as you pointed out.
So at least one generator of $R$ has to map to our order-two element. In the case of the Klein four group, there appear to be three possibilities, but I claim that up to an isomorphism of the Klein four group, there is only one possibility.
Actually, this exhausts the possibilities for groups of order 44: we have two abelian groups, $mathbb Z_11timesmathbbZ_4$, $mathbb Z_11times mathbbZ_2times mathbb Z_2$, and two nonabelian groups: $mathbbZ_11 rtimes mathbb Z_4 = langle a,b mid a^11, b^4, b^-1ab = a^-1rangle$ and $mathbb Z_11rtimes(mathbb Z_2 times mathbb Z_2) = langle a, b, c mid a^11, b^2, c^2, [b,c], b^-1ab = c^-1ac = a^-1 rangle$. I think the latter is $D_22$ (for 22-gon, not order of group), while the former has an element of order $4$.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
Rylee LymanRylee Lyman
646211
646211
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're on the right track (but NB your semidirect product is written in the wrong order). To analyze the possible maps $gamma : P to operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11) cong (Bbb Z_10, +)$, we consider separately the cases $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and $P cong Bbb Z_4$.
In the case $P cong Bbb Z_4$, $P$ is generated by a single element, $[1]$, of order $4$, and so $$operatornameid_Bbb Z_11 = gamma([0]) = gamma([1] + [1] + [1] + [1]) = gamma([1])^4 .$$ So, $gamma([1])$ has order dividing $4$, and the only such elements of $operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11) cong (Bbb Z_10, +)$ are $operatornameid_Bbb Z_11 leftrightarrow [0]$ and $(x mapsto -x) leftrightarrow [5]$.
If $gamma([1]) = operatornameid_Bbb Z_11$, then $gamma$ is the trivial homomorphism $Bbb Z_4 to operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11)$. This gives the direct product $G cong Bbb Z_11 times Bbb Z_4 cong Bbb Z_44 .$
If $gamma([1]) = (x mapsto -x)$, then $gamma([b])([c]) = (-1)^b [c]$, and the semidirect product $G = Bbb Z_11 rtimes_gamma Bbb Z_4$ is defined by
$$([a], [b]) cdot ([c], [d]) = ([a] + (-1)^b [c], [b] + [d]) .$$ It's apparent from the multiplication rule that this group is nonabelian. The fact that the group is generated by $u := ([1], [0])$ and $v := ([0], [1])$ can be used to construct an explicit presentation of this group and to show that $G$ is the dicyclic group of order $44$.
One can analyze the case $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ similarly, and this case gives rise to two more groups up to isomorphism, namely the abelian group $Bbb Z_11 times Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and the (nonabelian) dihedral group $D_44 cong D_22 times Bbb Z_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're on the right track (but NB your semidirect product is written in the wrong order). To analyze the possible maps $gamma : P to operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11) cong (Bbb Z_10, +)$, we consider separately the cases $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and $P cong Bbb Z_4$.
In the case $P cong Bbb Z_4$, $P$ is generated by a single element, $[1]$, of order $4$, and so $$operatornameid_Bbb Z_11 = gamma([0]) = gamma([1] + [1] + [1] + [1]) = gamma([1])^4 .$$ So, $gamma([1])$ has order dividing $4$, and the only such elements of $operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11) cong (Bbb Z_10, +)$ are $operatornameid_Bbb Z_11 leftrightarrow [0]$ and $(x mapsto -x) leftrightarrow [5]$.
If $gamma([1]) = operatornameid_Bbb Z_11$, then $gamma$ is the trivial homomorphism $Bbb Z_4 to operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11)$. This gives the direct product $G cong Bbb Z_11 times Bbb Z_4 cong Bbb Z_44 .$
If $gamma([1]) = (x mapsto -x)$, then $gamma([b])([c]) = (-1)^b [c]$, and the semidirect product $G = Bbb Z_11 rtimes_gamma Bbb Z_4$ is defined by
$$([a], [b]) cdot ([c], [d]) = ([a] + (-1)^b [c], [b] + [d]) .$$ It's apparent from the multiplication rule that this group is nonabelian. The fact that the group is generated by $u := ([1], [0])$ and $v := ([0], [1])$ can be used to construct an explicit presentation of this group and to show that $G$ is the dicyclic group of order $44$.
One can analyze the case $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ similarly, and this case gives rise to two more groups up to isomorphism, namely the abelian group $Bbb Z_11 times Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and the (nonabelian) dihedral group $D_44 cong D_22 times Bbb Z_2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You're on the right track (but NB your semidirect product is written in the wrong order). To analyze the possible maps $gamma : P to operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11) cong (Bbb Z_10, +)$, we consider separately the cases $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and $P cong Bbb Z_4$.
In the case $P cong Bbb Z_4$, $P$ is generated by a single element, $[1]$, of order $4$, and so $$operatornameid_Bbb Z_11 = gamma([0]) = gamma([1] + [1] + [1] + [1]) = gamma([1])^4 .$$ So, $gamma([1])$ has order dividing $4$, and the only such elements of $operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11) cong (Bbb Z_10, +)$ are $operatornameid_Bbb Z_11 leftrightarrow [0]$ and $(x mapsto -x) leftrightarrow [5]$.
If $gamma([1]) = operatornameid_Bbb Z_11$, then $gamma$ is the trivial homomorphism $Bbb Z_4 to operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11)$. This gives the direct product $G cong Bbb Z_11 times Bbb Z_4 cong Bbb Z_44 .$
If $gamma([1]) = (x mapsto -x)$, then $gamma([b])([c]) = (-1)^b [c]$, and the semidirect product $G = Bbb Z_11 rtimes_gamma Bbb Z_4$ is defined by
$$([a], [b]) cdot ([c], [d]) = ([a] + (-1)^b [c], [b] + [d]) .$$ It's apparent from the multiplication rule that this group is nonabelian. The fact that the group is generated by $u := ([1], [0])$ and $v := ([0], [1])$ can be used to construct an explicit presentation of this group and to show that $G$ is the dicyclic group of order $44$.
One can analyze the case $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ similarly, and this case gives rise to two more groups up to isomorphism, namely the abelian group $Bbb Z_11 times Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and the (nonabelian) dihedral group $D_44 cong D_22 times Bbb Z_2$.
$endgroup$
You're on the right track (but NB your semidirect product is written in the wrong order). To analyze the possible maps $gamma : P to operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11) cong (Bbb Z_10, +)$, we consider separately the cases $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and $P cong Bbb Z_4$.
In the case $P cong Bbb Z_4$, $P$ is generated by a single element, $[1]$, of order $4$, and so $$operatornameid_Bbb Z_11 = gamma([0]) = gamma([1] + [1] + [1] + [1]) = gamma([1])^4 .$$ So, $gamma([1])$ has order dividing $4$, and the only such elements of $operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11) cong (Bbb Z_10, +)$ are $operatornameid_Bbb Z_11 leftrightarrow [0]$ and $(x mapsto -x) leftrightarrow [5]$.
If $gamma([1]) = operatornameid_Bbb Z_11$, then $gamma$ is the trivial homomorphism $Bbb Z_4 to operatornameAut(Bbb Z_11)$. This gives the direct product $G cong Bbb Z_11 times Bbb Z_4 cong Bbb Z_44 .$
If $gamma([1]) = (x mapsto -x)$, then $gamma([b])([c]) = (-1)^b [c]$, and the semidirect product $G = Bbb Z_11 rtimes_gamma Bbb Z_4$ is defined by
$$([a], [b]) cdot ([c], [d]) = ([a] + (-1)^b [c], [b] + [d]) .$$ It's apparent from the multiplication rule that this group is nonabelian. The fact that the group is generated by $u := ([1], [0])$ and $v := ([0], [1])$ can be used to construct an explicit presentation of this group and to show that $G$ is the dicyclic group of order $44$.
One can analyze the case $P cong Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ similarly, and this case gives rise to two more groups up to isomorphism, namely the abelian group $Bbb Z_11 times Bbb Z_2 times Bbb Z_2$ and the (nonabelian) dihedral group $D_44 cong D_22 times Bbb Z_2$.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
TravisTravis
64.6k769152
64.6k769152
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3197658%2fconstruct-a-nonabelian-group-of-order-44%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I think you meant $r^11$ (r^11), not $r^11$ (r^11)
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I've taken the liberty of apply the correction J.W. Tanner mentioned, as well as a few other minor fixes.
$endgroup$
– Travis
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don’t understand the words, “because $tilde5inBbb Z_10$ has order $4$”
$endgroup$
– Lubin
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Doesn't $tilde5 in mathbbZ_10$ have order $2$?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
And if you have a non-abelian group of order 22, isn't it easy to find one of order 44?
$endgroup$
– Peter Shor
2 hours ago