Kepler's 3rd law: ratios don't fit data2019 Community Moderator Election Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) 2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionKepler's third law doesn't give earth's orbital period! Why?Only gravitation and Newton's $2^mathrmnd$ law needed to derive Kepler's laws?Newton's gravity formulas for ellipsesAngular Momentum and Kepler's Second LawCan the constant $k$ from Kepler's third law be independent of the mass of the planet?Kepler's law and my problemKepler's 3rd law applied to binary systems: How can the two orbits have different semi-major axes?Which Kepler laws might change with the Universal Gravitational Constant?Why does angular momentum being constant prove Kepler's first law?Kepler's third law is unintuitive

Can Deduction Guide have an explicit(bool) specifier?

What's the connection between Mr. Nancy and fried chicken?

Coin Game with infinite paradox

tabularx column has extra padding at right?

Do chord progressions usually move by fifths?

Does traveling In The United States require a passport or can I use my green card if not a US citizen?

Why these surprising proportionalities of integrals involving odd zeta values?

Compiling and throwing simple dynamic exceptions at runtime for JVM

Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?

Why doesn't the university give past final exams' answers?

Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions

Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?

How to get a single big right brace?

Would I be safe to drive a 23 year old truck for 7 hours / 450 miles?

What were wait-states, and why was it only an issue for PCs?

Protagonist's race is hidden - should I reveal it?

Who's this lady in the war room?

Why is ArcGIS Pro not symbolizing my entire range of values?

Network Switch Upgrade Planning questions

Unix AIX passing variable and arguments to expect and spawn

Trying to enter the Fox's den



Kepler's 3rd law: ratios don't fit data



2019 Community Moderator Election
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionKepler's third law doesn't give earth's orbital period! Why?Only gravitation and Newton's $2^mathrmnd$ law needed to derive Kepler's laws?Newton's gravity formulas for ellipsesAngular Momentum and Kepler's Second LawCan the constant $k$ from Kepler's third law be independent of the mass of the planet?Kepler's law and my problemKepler's 3rd law applied to binary systems: How can the two orbits have different semi-major axes?Which Kepler laws might change with the Universal Gravitational Constant?Why does angular momentum being constant prove Kepler's first law?Kepler's third law is unintuitive










1












$begingroup$


I have been looking at satellite orbits around the earth, or any object around any planet in fact, and am trying to find the orbital radius, or semi major length of a given satellite.



Kepler's third law gives the equation $P^2 = a^3$ where $P$ is the period of orbit and $a$ the distance.



I have a table of satellites currently orbiting the earth, as well as their altitude in the sky on their geosynchronous trajectory. One in particular is 99.9 and has an altitude of 705.



By solving the equation for $a$, I get $a = (P^2)^1/3$.



When I plug in the numbers, they don't correspond.



So my questions are:



  1. Are there unit standards I need for both $P$ and $a$? Currently $P$ is in minutes, $a$ in kilometres.

  2. Am I missing something, like Newton's universal gravitational constant? I get a page deriving Kepler's third law using this constant.









share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6
    $endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The equality only holds in certain units since its dimensionally inhomogeneous. In particular, if you use Earth years and the Earth-Sun distance (i.e. 1a.u.) then it's true, so it must be true in those specific units.
    $endgroup$
    – jacob1729
    2 hours ago















1












$begingroup$


I have been looking at satellite orbits around the earth, or any object around any planet in fact, and am trying to find the orbital radius, or semi major length of a given satellite.



Kepler's third law gives the equation $P^2 = a^3$ where $P$ is the period of orbit and $a$ the distance.



I have a table of satellites currently orbiting the earth, as well as their altitude in the sky on their geosynchronous trajectory. One in particular is 99.9 and has an altitude of 705.



By solving the equation for $a$, I get $a = (P^2)^1/3$.



When I plug in the numbers, they don't correspond.



So my questions are:



  1. Are there unit standards I need for both $P$ and $a$? Currently $P$ is in minutes, $a$ in kilometres.

  2. Am I missing something, like Newton's universal gravitational constant? I get a page deriving Kepler's third law using this constant.









share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6
    $endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The equality only holds in certain units since its dimensionally inhomogeneous. In particular, if you use Earth years and the Earth-Sun distance (i.e. 1a.u.) then it's true, so it must be true in those specific units.
    $endgroup$
    – jacob1729
    2 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


I have been looking at satellite orbits around the earth, or any object around any planet in fact, and am trying to find the orbital radius, or semi major length of a given satellite.



Kepler's third law gives the equation $P^2 = a^3$ where $P$ is the period of orbit and $a$ the distance.



I have a table of satellites currently orbiting the earth, as well as their altitude in the sky on their geosynchronous trajectory. One in particular is 99.9 and has an altitude of 705.



By solving the equation for $a$, I get $a = (P^2)^1/3$.



When I plug in the numbers, they don't correspond.



So my questions are:



  1. Are there unit standards I need for both $P$ and $a$? Currently $P$ is in minutes, $a$ in kilometres.

  2. Am I missing something, like Newton's universal gravitational constant? I get a page deriving Kepler's third law using this constant.









share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I have been looking at satellite orbits around the earth, or any object around any planet in fact, and am trying to find the orbital radius, or semi major length of a given satellite.



Kepler's third law gives the equation $P^2 = a^3$ where $P$ is the period of orbit and $a$ the distance.



I have a table of satellites currently orbiting the earth, as well as their altitude in the sky on their geosynchronous trajectory. One in particular is 99.9 and has an altitude of 705.



By solving the equation for $a$, I get $a = (P^2)^1/3$.



When I plug in the numbers, they don't correspond.



So my questions are:



  1. Are there unit standards I need for both $P$ and $a$? Currently $P$ is in minutes, $a$ in kilometres.

  2. Am I missing something, like Newton's universal gravitational constant? I get a page deriving Kepler's third law using this constant.






newtonian-mechanics newtonian-gravity orbital-motion celestial-mechanics satellites






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









Qmechanic

108k122001253




108k122001253






New contributor




triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









triple7triple7

83




83




New contributor




triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






triple7 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6
    $endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The equality only holds in certain units since its dimensionally inhomogeneous. In particular, if you use Earth years and the Earth-Sun distance (i.e. 1a.u.) then it's true, so it must be true in those specific units.
    $endgroup$
    – jacob1729
    2 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6
    $endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The equality only holds in certain units since its dimensionally inhomogeneous. In particular, if you use Earth years and the Earth-Sun distance (i.e. 1a.u.) then it's true, so it must be true in those specific units.
    $endgroup$
    – jacob1729
    2 hours ago















$begingroup$
hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kepler.html#c6
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
The equality only holds in certain units since its dimensionally inhomogeneous. In particular, if you use Earth years and the Earth-Sun distance (i.e. 1a.u.) then it's true, so it must be true in those specific units.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
The equality only holds in certain units since its dimensionally inhomogeneous. In particular, if you use Earth years and the Earth-Sun distance (i.e. 1a.u.) then it's true, so it must be true in those specific units.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
2 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

that equality should be a proportional to sign. In particular, in SI, the squared period has units of seconds squared, and the semi-major radius of of the orbit cubed is in meters cubed, so they can't be equal.



Instead, I'd be checking whether $T^2/a^3$ is constant for different satellites orbiting the same object (Like the ISS and the moon, for example)






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
    $endgroup$
    – triple7
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
    $endgroup$
    – Jerry Schirmer
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yep, finally found it. Thanks
    $endgroup$
    – triple7
    3 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$

The general form of Kepler's period law is $T^2 = frac4pi^2G(M+m)a^3$. Often, we make the simplifying assumption that $M>>m$, so that $M+m approx M$.



Kepler's period law only takes the form $T^2 = a^3$ (forgetting about the units) when you use certain quantities- in this case, $M$ being solar mass, $T$ being an Earth year, and $a$ being an astronomical unit.



Try plugging into the equation for the mass of earth (and don't bother with the satellite mass) and use units of meters and seconds. See if you get the right result!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Kepler's third law claims that $p^2 propto a^3$. The equality sign you use is incorrect.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "151"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      triple7 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474399%2fkeplers-3rd-law-ratios-dont-fit-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      that equality should be a proportional to sign. In particular, in SI, the squared period has units of seconds squared, and the semi-major radius of of the orbit cubed is in meters cubed, so they can't be equal.



      Instead, I'd be checking whether $T^2/a^3$ is constant for different satellites orbiting the same object (Like the ISS and the moon, for example)






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$








      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
        $endgroup$
        – triple7
        4 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
        $endgroup$
        – Jerry Schirmer
        4 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Yep, finally found it. Thanks
        $endgroup$
        – triple7
        3 hours ago















      2












      $begingroup$

      that equality should be a proportional to sign. In particular, in SI, the squared period has units of seconds squared, and the semi-major radius of of the orbit cubed is in meters cubed, so they can't be equal.



      Instead, I'd be checking whether $T^2/a^3$ is constant for different satellites orbiting the same object (Like the ISS and the moon, for example)






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$








      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
        $endgroup$
        – triple7
        4 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
        $endgroup$
        – Jerry Schirmer
        4 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Yep, finally found it. Thanks
        $endgroup$
        – triple7
        3 hours ago













      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$

      that equality should be a proportional to sign. In particular, in SI, the squared period has units of seconds squared, and the semi-major radius of of the orbit cubed is in meters cubed, so they can't be equal.



      Instead, I'd be checking whether $T^2/a^3$ is constant for different satellites orbiting the same object (Like the ISS and the moon, for example)






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      that equality should be a proportional to sign. In particular, in SI, the squared period has units of seconds squared, and the semi-major radius of of the orbit cubed is in meters cubed, so they can't be equal.



      Instead, I'd be checking whether $T^2/a^3$ is constant for different satellites orbiting the same object (Like the ISS and the moon, for example)







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited 4 hours ago

























      answered 4 hours ago









      Jerry SchirmerJerry Schirmer

      31.7k257107




      31.7k257107







      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
        $endgroup$
        – triple7
        4 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
        $endgroup$
        – Jerry Schirmer
        4 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Yep, finally found it. Thanks
        $endgroup$
        – triple7
        3 hours ago












      • 3




        $begingroup$
        Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
        $endgroup$
        – triple7
        4 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
        $endgroup$
        – Jerry Schirmer
        4 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Yep, finally found it. Thanks
        $endgroup$
        – triple7
        3 hours ago







      3




      3




      $begingroup$
      Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
      $endgroup$
      – triple7
      4 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Ok, as I'm blind and use a screenreader, I didn't realise it was a proportion sign. And most sites only show images for formulas, which are inaccessible too. Also, I am assuming you use latec or math jacks for the symbols here, which also make the screen reader hang In a cycle. Could you give me a simple ASCII form of the distance given a period?
      $endgroup$
      – triple7
      4 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      @triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
      $endgroup$
      – Jerry Schirmer
      4 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      @triple7: Keplers law says that the square of the period divided by the cube of the distance is equal to a constant for every central body. so, t squared divided by a cubed should be the same for the ISS and for the moon. After Kepler, Newton was able to come up with a theoretical formula to predict what this constant should be, which is 4 * pi squared / (G * M), where G is Newton's constant, and M is the mass of the central body.
      $endgroup$
      – Jerry Schirmer
      4 hours ago




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      Yep, finally found it. Thanks
      $endgroup$
      – triple7
      3 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Yep, finally found it. Thanks
      $endgroup$
      – triple7
      3 hours ago











      1












      $begingroup$

      The general form of Kepler's period law is $T^2 = frac4pi^2G(M+m)a^3$. Often, we make the simplifying assumption that $M>>m$, so that $M+m approx M$.



      Kepler's period law only takes the form $T^2 = a^3$ (forgetting about the units) when you use certain quantities- in this case, $M$ being solar mass, $T$ being an Earth year, and $a$ being an astronomical unit.



      Try plugging into the equation for the mass of earth (and don't bother with the satellite mass) and use units of meters and seconds. See if you get the right result!






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        1












        $begingroup$

        The general form of Kepler's period law is $T^2 = frac4pi^2G(M+m)a^3$. Often, we make the simplifying assumption that $M>>m$, so that $M+m approx M$.



        Kepler's period law only takes the form $T^2 = a^3$ (forgetting about the units) when you use certain quantities- in this case, $M$ being solar mass, $T$ being an Earth year, and $a$ being an astronomical unit.



        Try plugging into the equation for the mass of earth (and don't bother with the satellite mass) and use units of meters and seconds. See if you get the right result!






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          The general form of Kepler's period law is $T^2 = frac4pi^2G(M+m)a^3$. Often, we make the simplifying assumption that $M>>m$, so that $M+m approx M$.



          Kepler's period law only takes the form $T^2 = a^3$ (forgetting about the units) when you use certain quantities- in this case, $M$ being solar mass, $T$ being an Earth year, and $a$ being an astronomical unit.



          Try plugging into the equation for the mass of earth (and don't bother with the satellite mass) and use units of meters and seconds. See if you get the right result!






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The general form of Kepler's period law is $T^2 = frac4pi^2G(M+m)a^3$. Often, we make the simplifying assumption that $M>>m$, so that $M+m approx M$.



          Kepler's period law only takes the form $T^2 = a^3$ (forgetting about the units) when you use certain quantities- in this case, $M$ being solar mass, $T$ being an Earth year, and $a$ being an astronomical unit.



          Try plugging into the equation for the mass of earth (and don't bother with the satellite mass) and use units of meters and seconds. See if you get the right result!







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 4 hours ago

























          answered 4 hours ago









          swickrotationswickrotation

          615




          615





















              0












              $begingroup$

              Kepler's third law claims that $p^2 propto a^3$. The equality sign you use is incorrect.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                Kepler's third law claims that $p^2 propto a^3$. The equality sign you use is incorrect.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Kepler's third law claims that $p^2 propto a^3$. The equality sign you use is incorrect.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Kepler's third law claims that $p^2 propto a^3$. The equality sign you use is incorrect.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 4 hours ago









                  my2ctsmy2cts

                  5,9342719




                  5,9342719




















                      triple7 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      triple7 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      triple7 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      triple7 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474399%2fkeplers-3rd-law-ratios-dont-fit-data%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Dapidodigma demeter Subspecies | Notae | Tabula navigationisDapidodigmaAfrotropical Butterflies: Lycaenidae - Subtribe IolainaAmplifica

                      Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

                      Gaius Norbanus Flaccus (consul 38 a.C.n.) Index De gente | De cursu honorum | Notae | Fontes | Si vis plura legere | Tabula navigationisHic legere potes