Okay to merge included columns on otherwise identical indexes? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)SQL server indexing foreign keys, covering indexes included columnsdifference between having many non clustered index with single columns and with combination of many columnsTwo identical MySQL tables, one not using indexesAre these indexes redundant?Does Index Intersection work with Included Columns?Effect of an index on update statements where update column is not in an indexSQL Server : Included columns in an Index: is there something like “too many”?Any reason to have both an index with included columns and one without?Index creation with multiple columns - should I combine as many as possible?Table/Column Character Encoding and Indexes

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

How do I name drop voicings

How to tell that you are a giant?

Dating a Former Employee

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

What's the purpose of writing one's academic biography in the third person?

Why are Kinder Surprise Eggs illegal in the USA?

English words in a non-english sci-fi novel

How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?

Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?

What does F' and F" mean?

Why do people hide their license plates in the EU?

List *all* the tuples!

How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"

List of Python versions

The logistics of corpse disposal

At the end of Thor: Ragnarok why don't the Asgardians turn and head for the Bifrost as per their original plan?

How to find out what spells would be useless to a blind NPC spellcaster?

Apollo command module space walk?

Book where humans were engineered with genes from animal species to survive hostile planets

Identifying polygons that intersect with another layer using QGIS?

Can a USB port passively 'listen only'?

How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?

When were vectors invented?



Okay to merge included columns on otherwise identical indexes?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)SQL server indexing foreign keys, covering indexes included columnsdifference between having many non clustered index with single columns and with combination of many columnsTwo identical MySQL tables, one not using indexesAre these indexes redundant?Does Index Intersection work with Included Columns?Effect of an index on update statements where update column is not in an indexSQL Server : Included columns in an Index: is there something like “too many”?Any reason to have both an index with included columns and one without?Index creation with multiple columns - should I combine as many as possible?Table/Column Character Encoding and Indexes



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.



There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?










share|improve this question




























    3















    I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.



    There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?










    share|improve this question
























      3












      3








      3








      I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.



      There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?










      share|improve this question














      I have two indexes that index the same field on the same table. The only difference between them is the included columns.



      There's no reason I shouldn't combine the included columns and just have one index, right?







      sql-server index






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 7 hours ago









      BVernonBVernon

      218413




      218413




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f234982%2fokay-to-merge-included-columns-on-otherwise-identical-indexes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago















          5














          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago













          5












          5








          5







          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint






          share|improve this answer













          Yes, you should merge these indexes and only keep one, as long as you verify that:



          • Neither of them are marked as UNIQUE (in which case, preserve that one)


          • Neither of them have a filter condition


          • Neither of them are expressly referenced in an index hint







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          Erik DarlingErik Darling

          22.9k1269113




          22.9k1269113












          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago

















          • Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

            – BVernon
            5 hours ago
















          Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

          – BVernon
          5 hours ago





          Thanks. I just combined like 5 indexes and shed close to a gigabyte of data, lol. :)

          – BVernon
          5 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f234982%2fokay-to-merge-included-columns-on-otherwise-identical-indexes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Dapidodigma demeter Subspecies | Notae | Tabula navigationisDapidodigmaAfrotropical Butterflies: Lycaenidae - Subtribe IolainaAmplifica

          Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

          Vas sanguineum Index Historia | Divisio | Constructio anatomica | Vasorum sanguineorum morbi (angiopathiae) | Notae | Nexus interniTabula navigationisAmplifica