Coordinate position not preciseWith TikZ, How do I use a labeled coordinate that's inside a node?Rotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationTikZ: text along path as nodeHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ/ERD: node (=Entity) label on the insideTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of them

Finding all intervals that match predicate in vector

How do I keep an essay about "feeling flat" from feeling flat?

Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?

Displaying the order of the columns of a table

Bash method for viewing beginning and end of file

Why did Kant, Hegel, and Adorno leave some words and phrases in the Greek alphabet?

quarter to five p.m

Everything Bob says is false. How does he get people to trust him?

How was Earth single-handedly capable of creating 3 of the 4 gods of chaos?

Why are on-board computers allowed to change controls without notifying the pilots?

apt-get update is failing in debian

Best way to store options for panels

Coordinate position not precise

Personal Teleportation as a Weapon

Using parameter substitution on a Bash array

how to analyze "是其于主也至忠矣"

Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?

How do I define a right arrow with bar in LaTeX?

Print name if parameter passed to function

Was the picture area of a CRT a parallelogram (instead of a true rectangle)?

How can I get through very long and very dry, but also very useful technical documents when learning a new tool?

The baby cries all morning

Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?

Opposite of a diet



Coordinate position not precise


With TikZ, How do I use a labeled coordinate that's inside a node?Rotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationTikZ: text along path as nodeHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?TikZ/ERD: node (=Entity) label on the insideTikZ: Drawing an arc from an intersection to an intersectionDrawing rectilinear curves in Tikz, aka an Etch-a-Sketch drawingLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of them













2















documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath

begindocument

begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) node[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$](A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture

enddocument


My problem is as follows:



  • I have attempted to define a coordinate (A1) at the end of the first line (name path ACL).

  • I then use this coordinate (A1) as the last coordinate in the second line (name path ACLt).

It seems that the coordinate is not truly at the end of the line, since the dotted line is extending slightly beyond the thick blue line:



enter image description here



Why is this occurring?










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Node's have finite size and you can simply say draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1); which will work fine when A1 is a coordinate.

    – marmot
    2 hours ago















2















documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath

begindocument

begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) node[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$](A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture

enddocument


My problem is as follows:



  • I have attempted to define a coordinate (A1) at the end of the first line (name path ACL).

  • I then use this coordinate (A1) as the last coordinate in the second line (name path ACLt).

It seems that the coordinate is not truly at the end of the line, since the dotted line is extending slightly beyond the thick blue line:



enter image description here



Why is this occurring?










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Node's have finite size and you can simply say draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1); which will work fine when A1 is a coordinate.

    – marmot
    2 hours ago













2












2








2








documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath

begindocument

begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) node[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$](A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture

enddocument


My problem is as follows:



  • I have attempted to define a coordinate (A1) at the end of the first line (name path ACL).

  • I then use this coordinate (A1) as the last coordinate in the second line (name path ACLt).

It seems that the coordinate is not truly at the end of the line, since the dotted line is extending slightly beyond the thick blue line:



enter image description here



Why is this occurring?










share|improve this question














documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath

begindocument

begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) node[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$](A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture

enddocument


My problem is as follows:



  • I have attempted to define a coordinate (A1) at the end of the first line (name path ACL).

  • I then use this coordinate (A1) as the last coordinate in the second line (name path ACLt).

It seems that the coordinate is not truly at the end of the line, since the dotted line is extending slightly beyond the thick blue line:



enter image description here



Why is this occurring?







tikz-pgf coordinates






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









Thevesh ThevaThevesh Theva

519114




519114







  • 1





    Node's have finite size and you can simply say draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1); which will work fine when A1 is a coordinate.

    – marmot
    2 hours ago












  • 1





    Node's have finite size and you can simply say draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1); which will work fine when A1 is a coordinate.

    – marmot
    2 hours ago







1




1





Node's have finite size and you can simply say draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1); which will work fine when A1 is a coordinate.

– marmot
2 hours ago





Node's have finite size and you can simply say draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H)-- (H) --(A1); which will work fine when A1 is a coordinate.

– marmot
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate instead of node because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.



documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath

begindocument

begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!

    – Thevesh Theva
    2 hours ago












  • I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference between node and coordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.

    – Kpym
    47 mins ago











  • @Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.

    – marmot
    9 mins ago


















5














calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate and result will become as you wish:



enter image description here



documentclassstandalone
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
usepackageamsmath

begindocument

begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
endtikzpicture

enddocument


difference between node and coordinate arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt the result will be the same.



off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)






share|improve this answer
























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481586%2fcoordinate-position-not-precise%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate instead of node because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.



    documentclassstandalone
    usepackagetikz
    usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
    draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

    draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
    coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
    coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
    draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
    endtikzpicture

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!

      – Thevesh Theva
      2 hours ago












    • I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference between node and coordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.

      – Kpym
      47 mins ago











    • @Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.

      – marmot
      9 mins ago















    3














    Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate instead of node because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.



    documentclassstandalone
    usepackagetikz
    usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
    draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

    draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
    coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
    coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
    draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
    endtikzpicture

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!

      – Thevesh Theva
      2 hours ago












    • I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference between node and coordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.

      – Kpym
      47 mins ago











    • @Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.

      – marmot
      9 mins ago













    3












    3








    3







    Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate instead of node because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.



    documentclassstandalone
    usepackagetikz
    usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
    draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

    draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
    coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
    coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
    draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
    endtikzpicture

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer













    Well, Zarko has turned my comment into "his" answer, but here it is again: use coordinate instead of node because the latter has a finite size (by default). And my answer and comment come with an arguably simpler construction of the path.



    documentclassstandalone
    usepackagetikz
    usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
    draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

    draw[dotted, name path = ACL] (0,0) plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8)
    coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
    coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
    draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] (0,0|-H) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (H) --(A1);
    endtikzpicture

    enddocument


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 hours ago









    marmotmarmot

    112k5141267




    112k5141267







    • 1





      Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!

      – Thevesh Theva
      2 hours ago












    • I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference between node and coordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.

      – Kpym
      47 mins ago











    • @Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.

      – marmot
      9 mins ago












    • 1





      Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!

      – Thevesh Theva
      2 hours ago












    • I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference between node and coordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.

      – Kpym
      47 mins ago











    • @Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.

      – marmot
      9 mins ago







    1




    1





    Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!

    – Thevesh Theva
    2 hours ago






    Upvoted both answers; accepted yours because your comment was sufficient for me to solve my problem before I saw either answer (I hadn't realised that nodes had a finite size even when I left the label empty). Thanks!

    – Thevesh Theva
    2 hours ago














    I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference between node and coordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.

    – Kpym
    47 mins ago





    I think that Zarko do not need your comment to see the difference between node and coordinate. TeX.SX is not a competition site "who will answer first" and we are not here to claim paternity of "greate" ideas, but just to help, IMHO.

    – Kpym
    47 mins ago













    @Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.

    – marmot
    9 mins ago





    @Kpym This is IMHO not the question. The question is whether or not one should acknowledge an earlier post saying the same thing. If you acknowledge this, it does not mean you didn't know that. It is just fair play.

    – marmot
    9 mins ago











    5














    calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate and result will become as you wish:



    enter image description here



    documentclassstandalone
    usepackagetikz
    usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
    draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

    draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
    plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
    coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
    draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
    endtikzpicture

    enddocument


    difference between node and coordinate arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt the result will be the same.



    off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)






    share|improve this answer





























      5














      calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate and result will become as you wish:



      enter image description here



      documentclassstandalone
      usepackagetikz
      usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
      usepackageamsmath

      begindocument

      begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
      draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

      draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
      plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
      coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
      draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
      endtikzpicture

      enddocument


      difference between node and coordinate arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt the result will be the same.



      off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)






      share|improve this answer



























        5












        5








        5







        calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate and result will become as you wish:



        enter image description here



        documentclassstandalone
        usepackagetikz
        usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
        usepackageamsmath

        begindocument

        begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
        draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

        draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
        plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
        coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
        draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
        endtikzpicture

        enddocument


        difference between node and coordinate arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt the result will be the same.



        off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)






        share|improve this answer















        calculation of coordinate is sufficient accurate, problem is that for it you use node, replace node with coordinate and result will become as you wish:



        enter image description here



        documentclassstandalone
        usepackagetikz
        usetikzlibrarycalc,intersections
        usepackageamsmath

        begindocument

        begintikzpicture[scale=0.5]
        draw[<->] (0,12) node[above]$w$ |- (12,0) node[right]$q_L$;

        draw[dotted, name path = ACL]
        plot [domain=0.7:9] (x,0.75*x + 0.8) coordinate[label=right:AC$_L$ = S$_L$] (A1);
        coordinate (H) at ($(5.6/0.75,5.6) - (0.8/0.75,0)$);
        draw[thick, blue, name path = ACLt] let p1 = (H) in (0,y1) node[left, red]$w_u$ -- (x1,y1) --(A1);
        endtikzpicture

        enddocument


        difference between node and coordinate arise since node has some width regardless if it is empty. it is determined by default value of inner sep. if you set it to zero: inner sep=0pt the result will be the same.



        off-topic: in your diagram you not use intersections library, so you can remove line names from code (as i do in aboveo mwe)







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 hours ago

























        answered 2 hours ago









        ZarkoZarko

        128k868167




        128k868167



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481586%2fcoordinate-position-not-precise%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Dapidodigma demeter Subspecies | Notae | Tabula navigationisDapidodigmaAfrotropical Butterflies: Lycaenidae - Subtribe IolainaAmplifica

            Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

            Gaius Norbanus Flaccus (consul 38 a.C.n.) Index De gente | De cursu honorum | Notae | Fontes | Si vis plura legere | Tabula navigationisHic legere potes