“Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.” – Why is there no article before “passengers”? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Contributor's Guide to English Language LearnersArticle Confusion Again! Why is there an 'a' instead of a 'the'?Can “the + noun” be a general reference?appendicitis is inflammation of the appendix — why is there no definite article in front of “inflammation”?Should I use “a” or “the” to designate the particular one I'm going to talk about?Why is there no article in the sentence “Then came number”?Definite article in “Police were able to find out where the father lived from _THE_ information the child provided”British colonies or the British colonies?“The Jesus who said” - why is there a definite article before the proper name “Jesus”?particularizing attribute with indefinite articleWhy is “Reports” in the sentence below without the article “The”?

Compiling and throwing simple dynamic exceptions at runtime for JVM

Does GDPR cover the collection of data by websites that crawl the web and resell user data

What kind of capacitor is this in the image?

Like totally amazing interchangeable sister outfit accessory swapping or whatever

Is Vivien of the Wilds + Wilderness Reclimation a competitive combo?

A German immigrant ancestor has a "Registration Affidavit of Alien Enemy" on file. What does that mean exactly?

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

Lights are flickering on and off after accidentally bumping into light switch

xkeyval -- read keys from file

How to renew schengen visas

tabularx column has extra padding at right?

Why does my GNOME settings mention "Moto C Plus"?

Magento 2 Editing phtml files in Production Mode

Protagonist's race is hidden - should I reveal it?

How is an IPA symbol that lacks a name (e.g. ɲ) called?

Combining list in a Cartesian product format with addition operation?

Can I take recommendation from someone I met at a conference?

Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public?

false 'Security alert' from Google - every login generates mails from 'no-reply@accounts.google.com'

What documents does someone with a long-term visa need to travel to another Schengen country?

IC on Digikey is 5x more expensive than board containing same IC on Alibaba: How?

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

How to get a single big right brace?

Can Deduction Guide have an explicit(bool) specifier?



“Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.” – Why is there no article before “passengers”?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Contributor's Guide to English Language LearnersArticle Confusion Again! Why is there an 'a' instead of a 'the'?Can “the + noun” be a general reference?appendicitis is inflammation of the appendix — why is there no definite article in front of “inflammation”?Should I use “a” or “the” to designate the particular one I'm going to talk about?Why is there no article in the sentence “Then came number”?Definite article in “Police were able to find out where the father lived from _THE_ information the child provided”British colonies or the British colonies?“The Jesus who said” - why is there a definite article before the proper name “Jesus”?particularizing attribute with indefinite articleWhy is “Reports” in the sentence below without the article “The”?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















After all, we are talking about very definite passengers – the ones that were on that train. Can it be gathered from the sentence that not all of the passengers were given a refund?



P.S. The sentence comes from a grammar book.










share|improve this question




























    2















    After all, we are talking about very definite passengers – the ones that were on that train. Can it be gathered from the sentence that not all of the passengers were given a refund?



    P.S. The sentence comes from a grammar book.










    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2








      After all, we are talking about very definite passengers – the ones that were on that train. Can it be gathered from the sentence that not all of the passengers were given a refund?



      P.S. The sentence comes from a grammar book.










      share|improve this question














      After all, we are talking about very definite passengers – the ones that were on that train. Can it be gathered from the sentence that not all of the passengers were given a refund?



      P.S. The sentence comes from a grammar book.







      articles






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      ZakZak

      6421311




      6421311




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.






          share|improve this answer






























            3














            The sentence




            Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




            is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




            After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




            Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




            After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




            Now the implication is otherwise.



            When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "481"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206580%2fsince-the-train-was-delayed-for-more-than-an-hour-passengers-were-given-a-full%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3














              It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.






              share|improve this answer



























                3














                It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.






                share|improve this answer

























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.






                  share|improve this answer













                  It could be a stylistic reason, because "the" has already been used for "the train", so "passengers" reads better. It is possibly from a newspaper article. Your reasoning is correct, the refund concerns these specific passengers.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  anoukanouk

                  1,773414




                  1,773414























                      3














                      The sentence




                      Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




                      is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




                      After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




                      Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




                      After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




                      Now the implication is otherwise.



                      When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        3














                        The sentence




                        Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




                        is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




                        After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




                        Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




                        After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




                        Now the implication is otherwise.



                        When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          3












                          3








                          3







                          The sentence




                          Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




                          is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




                          After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




                          Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




                          After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




                          Now the implication is otherwise.



                          When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.






                          share|improve this answer













                          The sentence




                          Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.




                          is formally ambiguous. One cannot tell from the sentence alone weather the passengers were given a refund -- that is, all the passengers. Or whether only some passengers were given a refund -- perhaps only those who complained. When an article is elided in this way, the reader must determine from context and common sense what the meaning is, and which article is implied. Here either choice is possible, although "the" seems more likely. But in another context the result would be different.




                          After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased.




                          Does that mean that every one of the dead person's friends and family spoke, or only some of them? Were all of them even present? "Some" is the likely choice here, but furhter context could change that.




                          After the minister's eulogy, friends and family spoke about the deceased -- all five who were still alive.




                          Now the implication is otherwise.



                          When the choice of article is obvious, omitting it does not mislead the reader. When there is more than one serious possibility, this may be poor writing. Or it may be intentionally ambiguous writing.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 1 hour ago









                          David SiegelDavid Siegel

                          2,994316




                          2,994316



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206580%2fsince-the-train-was-delayed-for-more-than-an-hour-passengers-were-given-a-full%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Saint-André (Pyrenaeus Orientalis) Nexus interni Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisOpenStreetMapGeoNames66168De hoc commune apud cassini.ehess.frHuius communis pagina interretialisAmplifica

                              Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

                              Montigny (Ligerula) Nexus interni Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisGeoNames45214Amplifica