Zrjydtj

Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?

High voltage LED indicator 40-1000 VDC without additional power supply

Arrow those variables!

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

Can you really stack all of this on an Opportunity Attack?

Codimension of non-flat locus

Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?

Theorems that impeded progress

I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

Client team has low performances and low technical skills: we always fix their work and now they stop collaborate with us. How to solve?

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?

How does quantile regression compare to logistic regression with the variable split at the quantile?

Can a(n) = n/n+1 be written recursively?

Malcev's paper "On a class of homogeneous spaces" in English

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?

Is it possible to run Internet Explorer on OS X El Capitan?

Intersection point of 2 lines defined by 2 points each

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

strTok function (thread safe, supports empty tokens, doesn't change string)

String case reverse function in CGet line from string functionTDD: String Calculator KataC - K&R getint() variationSimple function to generate an HTML-safe stringGeneric Pairing Heap PerformancePattern for writing a generic string transformation functionChange a string into a function/def activatorC++ string tokenizing without streams, with certain conditionsRead consecutive blanks in array

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;

2

$begingroup$

I'm new to C language and want to explode a string like we do in PHP explode() function, I searched for a built-in function with the C standard library, and I found strtok , but It doesn't support empty tokens like 1,2,3,,5 . Inspired by the answers I found in this SO question I made this function, it is supposed to be thread safe and support empty tokens and doesn't change the original string

char* strTok(char** newString, char* delimiter)

 char* string = *newString;
 char* delimiterFound = (char*) 0;
 int tokLenght = 0;
 char* tok = (char*) 0;

 if(!string) return (char*) 0;

 delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);

 if(delimiterFound)
 tokLenght = delimiterFound-string;
 else
 tokLenght = strlen(string);
 

 tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
 memcpy(tok, string, tokLenght);
 tok[tokLenght] = '';

 *newString = delimiterFound ? delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) : (char*)0;

 return tok;

I designed it to be used like

char* input = "1,2,3,4,5,6,7,,,10,";
char** inputP = &input;
char* tok;
while( (tok=strTok(inputP, ",")) )
 printf("%sn", tok);

beginner c strings

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

Accountant مAccountant م

1727

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Better user-interface then the original strtok. You may be interested in strsep, too. code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/string/strsep.c.html
  $endgroup$
  – Neil Edelman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @NeilEdelman thanks I never saw this function before, I will check it.
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  It's not in the standard C libraries, but in POSIX, (any type of gcc.) However, like strtok, it obliterates the char to replace it with , so it's not the same.
  $endgroup$
  – Neil Edelman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

I'm new to C language and want to explode a string like we do in PHP explode() function, I searched for a built-in function with the C standard library, and I found strtok , but It doesn't support empty tokens like 1,2,3,,5 . Inspired by the answers I found in this SO question I made this function, it is supposed to be thread safe and support empty tokens and doesn't change the original string

char* strTok(char** newString, char* delimiter)

 char* string = *newString;
 char* delimiterFound = (char*) 0;
 int tokLenght = 0;
 char* tok = (char*) 0;

 if(!string) return (char*) 0;

 delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);

 if(delimiterFound)
 tokLenght = delimiterFound-string;
 else
 tokLenght = strlen(string);
 

 tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
 memcpy(tok, string, tokLenght);
 tok[tokLenght] = '';

 *newString = delimiterFound ? delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) : (char*)0;

 return tok;

I designed it to be used like

char* input = "1,2,3,4,5,6,7,,,10,";
char** inputP = &input;
char* tok;
while( (tok=strTok(inputP, ",")) )
 printf("%sn", tok);

beginner c strings

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

Accountant مAccountant م

1727

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Better user-interface then the original strtok. You may be interested in strsep, too. code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/string/strsep.c.html
  $endgroup$
  – Neil Edelman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @NeilEdelman thanks I never saw this function before, I will check it.
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  It's not in the standard C libraries, but in POSIX, (any type of gcc.) However, like strtok, it obliterates the char to replace it with , so it's not the same.
  $endgroup$
  – Neil Edelman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

I'm new to C language and want to explode a string like we do in PHP explode() function, I searched for a built-in function with the C standard library, and I found strtok , but It doesn't support empty tokens like 1,2,3,,5 . Inspired by the answers I found in this SO question I made this function, it is supposed to be thread safe and support empty tokens and doesn't change the original string

char* strTok(char** newString, char* delimiter)

 char* string = *newString;
 char* delimiterFound = (char*) 0;
 int tokLenght = 0;
 char* tok = (char*) 0;

 if(!string) return (char*) 0;

 delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);

 if(delimiterFound)
 tokLenght = delimiterFound-string;
 else
 tokLenght = strlen(string);
 

 tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
 memcpy(tok, string, tokLenght);
 tok[tokLenght] = '';

 *newString = delimiterFound ? delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) : (char*)0;

 return tok;

I designed it to be used like

char* input = "1,2,3,4,5,6,7,,,10,";
char** inputP = &input;
char* tok;
while( (tok=strTok(inputP, ",")) )
 printf("%sn", tok);

beginner c strings

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

Accountant مAccountant م

1727

$endgroup$

char* strTok(char** newString, char* delimiter)

 char* string = *newString;
 char* delimiterFound = (char*) 0;
 int tokLenght = 0;
 char* tok = (char*) 0;

 if(!string) return (char*) 0;

 delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);

 if(delimiterFound)
 tokLenght = delimiterFound-string;
 else
 tokLenght = strlen(string);
 

 tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
 memcpy(tok, string, tokLenght);
 tok[tokLenght] = '';

 *newString = delimiterFound ? delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) : (char*)0;

 return tok;

char* input = "1,2,3,4,5,6,7,,,10,";
char** inputP = &input;
char* tok;
while( (tok=strTok(inputP, ",")) )
 printf("%sn", tok);

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

Accountant مAccountant م

1727

share|improve this question

asked 4 hours ago

Accountant مAccountant م

1727

asked 4 hours ago

Accountant مAccountant م

1727

asked 4 hours ago

Accountant مAccountant م

1727

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

1

$begingroup$

• delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) sounds like a bug. If the delimiter is longer than one character, *newString will point too far into the original, maybe even beyond the end. Correct me if I am wrong, delimiterFound + 1 is what you are actually after.



• 
  

  Modern C allows, and strongly encourages, to declare variables as close to their use a possible. Consider

  
  
  

  char * delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
  ....
  char * tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
  

  
  
  

  etc.

  
  



• Always test that malloc didn't fail.



• 
  

  More spaces - around keywords, braces, etc - definitely improve readability:

  
  
  

   if (....) 
   ....
   else 
   ....
   
  

  
  

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

vnpvnp

40.6k233103

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Thaaank you very much for these precious points, regarding the delimiter length bug, ummmm, I want to support long delimiters more than 1 characters like the boundary string in http requests that has content-type multi-part, and I don't think it's a bug because delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) can never be after the 0 byte that terminates the original string!, right ? "fooDELIMITER" 3 + 12
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @Accountantم Long delimiters here refer to, say ",;.", in where any character delimits the string on its own right.
  $endgroup$
  – vnp
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I didn't get it, I'm sorry, can you please give me an example input that can break this code, exploiting this bug ?
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @Accountantم Sorry for not being clear. I should realize that your intentions are different (and read man strstr more carefully). Consider it my blinder - since you mentioned strtok, I expected the strtok semantics.
  $endgroup$
  – vnp
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  It's my fault because I said it's strtok, I wanted strtok that can support delimiters more than 1 characters, because I need this feature a lot. So do you mean it's not a bug ??
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

1

$begingroup$

From a readability viewpoint, you should use NULL instead of (char*) 0 as it is easier to recognize what you're trying to do. Also, the tokLenght misspells "length", and should probably be tokLength.

You leak memory, as the memory allocated to hold the returned string is never freed.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

1201ProgramAlarm1201ProgramAlarm

3,6532925

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Thank you very much I will use NULL from now on, and I will remember to free() memory , 'I miss PHP garbage collector :(', I didn't get the tokLength spelling note, aren't they the same ?
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  It's a matter of style, and including .h if you want to use NULL. However, you don't have to cast (char *)0, just use 0 (or NULL.) It knows from the return type.
  $endgroup$
  – Neil Edelman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f216956%2fstrtok-function-thread-safe-supports-empty-tokens-doesnt-change-string%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

1

$begingroup$

• delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) sounds like a bug. If the delimiter is longer than one character, *newString will point too far into the original, maybe even beyond the end. Correct me if I am wrong, delimiterFound + 1 is what you are actually after.



• 
  

  Modern C allows, and strongly encourages, to declare variables as close to their use a possible. Consider

  
  
  

  char * delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
  ....
  char * tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
  

  
  
  

  etc.

  
  



• Always test that malloc didn't fail.



• 
  

  More spaces - around keywords, braces, etc - definitely improve readability:

  
  
  

   if (....) 
   ....
   else 
   ....
   
  

  
  

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

vnpvnp

40.6k233103

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Thaaank you very much for these precious points, regarding the delimiter length bug, ummmm, I want to support long delimiters more than 1 characters like the boundary string in http requests that has content-type multi-part, and I don't think it's a bug because delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) can never be after the 0 byte that terminates the original string!, right ? "fooDELIMITER" 3 + 12
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @Accountantم Long delimiters here refer to, say ",;.", in where any character delimits the string on its own right.
  $endgroup$
  – vnp
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I didn't get it, I'm sorry, can you please give me an example input that can break this code, exploiting this bug ?
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @Accountantم Sorry for not being clear. I should realize that your intentions are different (and read man strstr more carefully). Consider it my blinder - since you mentioned strtok, I expected the strtok semantics.
  $endgroup$
  – vnp
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  It's my fault because I said it's strtok, I wanted strtok that can support delimiters more than 1 characters, because I need this feature a lot. So do you mean it's not a bug ??
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

1

$begingroup$

• delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) sounds like a bug. If the delimiter is longer than one character, *newString will point too far into the original, maybe even beyond the end. Correct me if I am wrong, delimiterFound + 1 is what you are actually after.



• 
  

  Modern C allows, and strongly encourages, to declare variables as close to their use a possible. Consider

  
  
  

  char * delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
  ....
  char * tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
  

  
  
  

  etc.

  
  



• Always test that malloc didn't fail.



• 
  

  More spaces - around keywords, braces, etc - definitely improve readability:

  
  
  

   if (....) 
   ....
   else 
   ....
   
  

  
  

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

vnpvnp

40.6k233103

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Thaaank you very much for these precious points, regarding the delimiter length bug, ummmm, I want to support long delimiters more than 1 characters like the boundary string in http requests that has content-type multi-part, and I don't think it's a bug because delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) can never be after the 0 byte that terminates the original string!, right ? "fooDELIMITER" 3 + 12
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @Accountantم Long delimiters here refer to, say ",;.", in where any character delimits the string on its own right.
  $endgroup$
  – vnp
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  I didn't get it, I'm sorry, can you please give me an example input that can break this code, exploiting this bug ?
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @Accountantم Sorry for not being clear. I should realize that your intentions are different (and read man strstr more carefully). Consider it my blinder - since you mentioned strtok, I expected the strtok semantics.
  $endgroup$
  – vnp
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  It's my fault because I said it's strtok, I wanted strtok that can support delimiters more than 1 characters, because I need this feature a lot. So do you mean it's not a bug ??
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 1 more comment

$begingroup$

• delimiterFound + strlen(delimiter) sounds like a bug. If the delimiter is longer than one character, *newString will point too far into the original, maybe even beyond the end. Correct me if I am wrong, delimiterFound + 1 is what you are actually after.



• 
  

  Modern C allows, and strongly encourages, to declare variables as close to their use a possible. Consider

  
  
  

  char * delimiterFound = strstr(string, delimiter);
  ....
  char * tok = malloc(tokLenght + 1);
  

  
  
  

  etc.

  
  



• Always test that malloc didn't fail.



• 
  

  More spaces - around keywords, braces, etc - definitely improve readability:

  
  
  

   if (....) 
   ....
   else 
   ....
   
  

  
  

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

vnpvnp

40.6k233103

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

vnpvnp

40.6k233103

answered 3 hours ago

vnpvnp

40.6k233103

answered 3 hours ago

vnpvnp

40.6k233103

1

$begingroup$

From a readability viewpoint, you should use NULL instead of (char*) 0 as it is easier to recognize what you're trying to do. Also, the tokLenght misspells "length", and should probably be tokLength.

You leak memory, as the memory allocated to hold the returned string is never freed.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

1201ProgramAlarm1201ProgramAlarm

3,6532925

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Thank you very much I will use NULL from now on, and I will remember to free() memory , 'I miss PHP garbage collector :(', I didn't get the tokLength spelling note, aren't they the same ?
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  It's a matter of style, and including .h if you want to use NULL. However, you don't have to cast (char *)0, just use 0 (or NULL.) It knows from the return type.
  $endgroup$
  – Neil Edelman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

From a readability viewpoint, you should use NULL instead of (char*) 0 as it is easier to recognize what you're trying to do. Also, the tokLenght misspells "length", and should probably be tokLength.

You leak memory, as the memory allocated to hold the returned string is never freed.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

1201ProgramAlarm1201ProgramAlarm

3,6532925

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Thank you very much I will use NULL from now on, and I will remember to free() memory , 'I miss PHP garbage collector :(', I didn't get the tokLength spelling note, aren't they the same ?
  $endgroup$
  – Accountant م
  2 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  It's a matter of style, and including .h if you want to use NULL. However, you don't have to cast (char *)0, just use 0 (or NULL.) It knows from the return type.
  $endgroup$
  – Neil Edelman
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

From a readability viewpoint, you should use NULL instead of (char*) 0 as it is easier to recognize what you're trying to do. Also, the tokLenght misspells "length", and should probably be tokLength.

You leak memory, as the memory allocated to hold the returned string is never freed.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

1201ProgramAlarm1201ProgramAlarm

3,6532925

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

1201ProgramAlarm1201ProgramAlarm

3,6532925

answered 3 hours ago

1201ProgramAlarm1201ProgramAlarm

3,6532925

answered 3 hours ago

1201ProgramAlarm1201ProgramAlarm

3,6532925