Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre there any implicit, continuous, non-differentiable functions?Logical Relations Between Three Statements about Continuous FunctionsCombination of continuous and discontinuous functionsIs there only one continuous-everywhere non-differentiable function?Intuition behind uniformly continuous functionsWhy weren't continuous functions defined as Darboux functions?Examples of functions that do not belong to any Baire classFind all continuous functions that satisfy the Jensen inequality(?) $f(fracx+y2)=fracf(x)+f(y)2$Confused About Limit Points and Closed SetsConfusion About Differentiability of Function

What is the steepest angle that a canal can be traversable without locks?

Can I write a for loop that iterates over both collections and arrays?

Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints

How can I create a character who can assume the widest possible range of creature sizes?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

How to manage monthly salary

I see my dog run

Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions

Is it possible for the two major parties in the UK to form a coalition with each other instead of a much smaller party?

Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol

Patience, young "Padovan"

How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?

Output the Arecibo Message

Pristine Bit Checking

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

What does "rabbited" mean/imply in this sentence?

What is the best strategy for white in this position?

Inline version of a function returns different value then non-inline version

JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Did USCIS resume its biometric service for UK visa?

aging parents with no investments

Why is Grand Jury testimony secret?



Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre there any implicit, continuous, non-differentiable functions?Logical Relations Between Three Statements about Continuous FunctionsCombination of continuous and discontinuous functionsIs there only one continuous-everywhere non-differentiable function?Intuition behind uniformly continuous functionsWhy weren't continuous functions defined as Darboux functions?Examples of functions that do not belong to any Baire classFind all continuous functions that satisfy the Jensen inequality(?) $f(fracx+y2)=fracf(x)+f(y)2$Confused About Limit Points and Closed SetsConfusion About Differentiability of Function










2












$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    1 hour ago















2












$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    1 hour ago













2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.







real-analysis functions derivatives continuity






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









fazanfazan

537




537











  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



    If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
    $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
    at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
      $endgroup$
      – Haris Gusic
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
      $endgroup$
      – K.Power
      2 hours ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



    The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



      The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



        The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



        The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 2 hours ago

























        answered 2 hours ago









        Haris GusicHaris Gusic

        3,506627




        3,506627





















            1












            $begingroup$

            As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



            If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
            $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
            at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
              $endgroup$
              – Haris Gusic
              2 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
              $endgroup$
              – K.Power
              2 hours ago















            1












            $begingroup$

            As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



            If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
            $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
            at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
              $endgroup$
              – Haris Gusic
              2 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
              $endgroup$
              – K.Power
              2 hours ago













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



            If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
            $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
            at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



            If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
            $$f(x,y)=begincases(x^2+y^2)sin(frac1sqrtx^2+y^2) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)endcases$$
            at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 1 hour ago

























            answered 2 hours ago









            K.PowerK.Power

            3,710926




            3,710926











            • $begingroup$
              The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
              $endgroup$
              – Haris Gusic
              2 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
              $endgroup$
              – K.Power
              2 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
              $endgroup$
              – Haris Gusic
              2 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
              $endgroup$
              – K.Power
              2 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
            $endgroup$
            – Haris Gusic
            2 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
            $endgroup$
            – Haris Gusic
            2 hours ago




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
            $endgroup$
            – K.Power
            2 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
            $endgroup$
            – K.Power
            2 hours ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Saint-André (Pyrenaeus Orientalis) Nexus interni Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisOpenStreetMapGeoNames66168De hoc commune apud cassini.ehess.frHuius communis pagina interretialisAmplifica

            Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

            Montigny (Ligerula) Nexus interni Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisGeoNames45214Amplifica