What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat are the most relevant security events/incidents any company should monitor?BitLocker : Update Volume Master Key and meaning of “keyed” vs “re-keyed”What is the difference between data and information when it comes to Data Security?Does “assesse” have a particular meaning in information security?What is the meaning of “me” in ipfw rules?What exactly is the meaning of 'trojan' and 'rootkit'?What is the difference between Compliance and Auditing in Information Security?What is the difference between a SIEM and a SOC?What is a “security bod”?What is a Security Guideline and how does it stand in relation with Standards, Policies, Procedures?

Inline version of a function returns different value then non-inline version

Inflated grade on resume at previous job, might former employer tell new employer?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Should I write numbers in words or as symbols in this case?

How to manage monthly salary

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?

Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol

Can I write a for loop that iterates over both collections and arrays?

What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Idomatic way to prevent slicing?

Falsification in Math vs Science

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?

What does sndry explns mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

How to interpret this form of Heaps' Law?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

Evaluating number of iteration with a certain map with While

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

What tool would a Roman-age civilisation use to reduce/breakup silver and other metals?

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed



What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat are the most relevant security events/incidents any company should monitor?BitLocker : Update Volume Master Key and meaning of “keyed” vs “re-keyed”What is the difference between data and information when it comes to Data Security?Does “assesse” have a particular meaning in information security?What is the meaning of “me” in ipfw rules?What exactly is the meaning of 'trojan' and 'rootkit'?What is the difference between Compliance and Auditing in Information Security?What is the difference between a SIEM and a SOC?What is a “security bod”?What is a Security Guideline and how does it stand in relation with Standards, Policies, Procedures?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I searched Google about this term, but the definitions that I found was related to the medical world, and nothing related to IT. I think that is some kind of procedure of documenting something maybe? Note that I heard this word for the first time in the SOC (Security Operations Center) that I am currently working.










share|improve this question






























    2















    I searched Google about this term, but the definitions that I found was related to the medical world, and nothing related to IT. I think that is some kind of procedure of documenting something maybe? Note that I heard this word for the first time in the SOC (Security Operations Center) that I am currently working.










    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2








      I searched Google about this term, but the definitions that I found was related to the medical world, and nothing related to IT. I think that is some kind of procedure of documenting something maybe? Note that I heard this word for the first time in the SOC (Security Operations Center) that I am currently working.










      share|improve this question
















      I searched Google about this term, but the definitions that I found was related to the medical world, and nothing related to IT. I think that is some kind of procedure of documenting something maybe? Note that I heard this word for the first time in the SOC (Security Operations Center) that I am currently working.







      terminology soc






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 11 mins ago









      schroeder

      78.8k30175211




      78.8k30175211










      asked 1 hour ago









      victor26567victor26567

      161




      161




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          We just got reports that 4000 of our systems are infected with ransomeware.



          3000 are end users, 800 are non-critical servers, 200 are critical servers.



          Triage is looking at this mess and deciding which order to start restoring systems in. We can't tackle them all at once, so we have to look at some and say 'Sorry, little Inspiron that couldn't, you get to sit there and be useless for a while.'



          It comes from the medical world, as you've stated. It's the same reasoning as an ER doctor looking at two patients and deciding to work on the one that they're more certain they can save. You let one go, as hard as it may be, so that the other might live. If you'd worked on the worse injured person, it's possible they both would have died.



          The difference in the security world is that often it's dollars lost due to users being unable to work, rather than literal life and death. You work on the systems that you are most likely to be able to restore, and that will return the largest amount of productivity to the environment. You leave the individual laptops that only affect a single user to the side, for now.






          share|improve this answer























          • wow, thanks a lot. So, in brief, it is like prioritize which systems you want to restore, because there are many of them, and you cant work with all of them at the same time, right?

            – victor26567
            1 hour ago











          • Pretty much. It's just deciding what systems make the most sense to fix first, because you have limited resources.

            – Adonalsium
            1 hour ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "162"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f207100%2fwhat-is-the-meaning-of-triage-in-cybersec-world%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          We just got reports that 4000 of our systems are infected with ransomeware.



          3000 are end users, 800 are non-critical servers, 200 are critical servers.



          Triage is looking at this mess and deciding which order to start restoring systems in. We can't tackle them all at once, so we have to look at some and say 'Sorry, little Inspiron that couldn't, you get to sit there and be useless for a while.'



          It comes from the medical world, as you've stated. It's the same reasoning as an ER doctor looking at two patients and deciding to work on the one that they're more certain they can save. You let one go, as hard as it may be, so that the other might live. If you'd worked on the worse injured person, it's possible they both would have died.



          The difference in the security world is that often it's dollars lost due to users being unable to work, rather than literal life and death. You work on the systems that you are most likely to be able to restore, and that will return the largest amount of productivity to the environment. You leave the individual laptops that only affect a single user to the side, for now.






          share|improve this answer























          • wow, thanks a lot. So, in brief, it is like prioritize which systems you want to restore, because there are many of them, and you cant work with all of them at the same time, right?

            – victor26567
            1 hour ago











          • Pretty much. It's just deciding what systems make the most sense to fix first, because you have limited resources.

            – Adonalsium
            1 hour ago















          4














          We just got reports that 4000 of our systems are infected with ransomeware.



          3000 are end users, 800 are non-critical servers, 200 are critical servers.



          Triage is looking at this mess and deciding which order to start restoring systems in. We can't tackle them all at once, so we have to look at some and say 'Sorry, little Inspiron that couldn't, you get to sit there and be useless for a while.'



          It comes from the medical world, as you've stated. It's the same reasoning as an ER doctor looking at two patients and deciding to work on the one that they're more certain they can save. You let one go, as hard as it may be, so that the other might live. If you'd worked on the worse injured person, it's possible they both would have died.



          The difference in the security world is that often it's dollars lost due to users being unable to work, rather than literal life and death. You work on the systems that you are most likely to be able to restore, and that will return the largest amount of productivity to the environment. You leave the individual laptops that only affect a single user to the side, for now.






          share|improve this answer























          • wow, thanks a lot. So, in brief, it is like prioritize which systems you want to restore, because there are many of them, and you cant work with all of them at the same time, right?

            – victor26567
            1 hour ago











          • Pretty much. It's just deciding what systems make the most sense to fix first, because you have limited resources.

            – Adonalsium
            1 hour ago













          4












          4








          4







          We just got reports that 4000 of our systems are infected with ransomeware.



          3000 are end users, 800 are non-critical servers, 200 are critical servers.



          Triage is looking at this mess and deciding which order to start restoring systems in. We can't tackle them all at once, so we have to look at some and say 'Sorry, little Inspiron that couldn't, you get to sit there and be useless for a while.'



          It comes from the medical world, as you've stated. It's the same reasoning as an ER doctor looking at two patients and deciding to work on the one that they're more certain they can save. You let one go, as hard as it may be, so that the other might live. If you'd worked on the worse injured person, it's possible they both would have died.



          The difference in the security world is that often it's dollars lost due to users being unable to work, rather than literal life and death. You work on the systems that you are most likely to be able to restore, and that will return the largest amount of productivity to the environment. You leave the individual laptops that only affect a single user to the side, for now.






          share|improve this answer













          We just got reports that 4000 of our systems are infected with ransomeware.



          3000 are end users, 800 are non-critical servers, 200 are critical servers.



          Triage is looking at this mess and deciding which order to start restoring systems in. We can't tackle them all at once, so we have to look at some and say 'Sorry, little Inspiron that couldn't, you get to sit there and be useless for a while.'



          It comes from the medical world, as you've stated. It's the same reasoning as an ER doctor looking at two patients and deciding to work on the one that they're more certain they can save. You let one go, as hard as it may be, so that the other might live. If you'd worked on the worse injured person, it's possible they both would have died.



          The difference in the security world is that often it's dollars lost due to users being unable to work, rather than literal life and death. You work on the systems that you are most likely to be able to restore, and that will return the largest amount of productivity to the environment. You leave the individual laptops that only affect a single user to the side, for now.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          AdonalsiumAdonalsium

          3,4311720




          3,4311720












          • wow, thanks a lot. So, in brief, it is like prioritize which systems you want to restore, because there are many of them, and you cant work with all of them at the same time, right?

            – victor26567
            1 hour ago











          • Pretty much. It's just deciding what systems make the most sense to fix first, because you have limited resources.

            – Adonalsium
            1 hour ago

















          • wow, thanks a lot. So, in brief, it is like prioritize which systems you want to restore, because there are many of them, and you cant work with all of them at the same time, right?

            – victor26567
            1 hour ago











          • Pretty much. It's just deciding what systems make the most sense to fix first, because you have limited resources.

            – Adonalsium
            1 hour ago
















          wow, thanks a lot. So, in brief, it is like prioritize which systems you want to restore, because there are many of them, and you cant work with all of them at the same time, right?

          – victor26567
          1 hour ago





          wow, thanks a lot. So, in brief, it is like prioritize which systems you want to restore, because there are many of them, and you cant work with all of them at the same time, right?

          – victor26567
          1 hour ago













          Pretty much. It's just deciding what systems make the most sense to fix first, because you have limited resources.

          – Adonalsium
          1 hour ago





          Pretty much. It's just deciding what systems make the most sense to fix first, because you have limited resources.

          – Adonalsium
          1 hour ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Information Security Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f207100%2fwhat-is-the-meaning-of-triage-in-cybersec-world%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Saint-André (Pyrenaeus Orientalis) Nexus interni Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisOpenStreetMapGeoNames66168De hoc commune apud cassini.ehess.frHuius communis pagina interretialisAmplifica

          Constantinus Vanšenkin Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisБольшая российская энциклопедияAmplifica

          Montigny (Ligerula) Nexus interni Nexus externi | Tabula navigationisGeoNames45214Amplifica